Bischoff W
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd. 1989;128:108-10.
In a controlled double-blind study the quality of the contrast produced by iopromide and iohexol was compared in two groups of 100 patients by excretory urography. The aim was to investigate whether iopromide or iohexol has any diagnostic advantages for the opacification of the kidneys, the renal pelves, and the ureters. The results show that there is no difference in contrast quality between the two substances (chi-square, p greater than 0.1). Moreover there is no difference in the frequency of concomitant symptoms (chi-square, p greater than 0.1). Both contrast media show the well-known excellent tolerance with only 1% side effects and the good contrast quality of the nonionic contrast media.
在一项对照双盲研究中，通过排泄性尿路造影术，对两组各100例患者使用碘普罗胺和碘海醇所产生的造影剂质量进行了比较。目的是研究碘普罗胺或碘海醇在使肾脏、肾盂和输尿管显影方面是否具有任何诊断优势。结果显示，两种造影剂在造影质量上没有差异（卡方检验，p大于0.1）。此外，伴随症状的发生率也没有差异（卡方检验，p大于0.1）。两种造影剂均显示出众所周知的良好耐受性，副作用仅为1%，且具有非离子型造影剂良好的造影质量。
