文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Harris Tess, Kerry Sally M, Victor Christina R, Ekelund Ulf, Woodcock Alison, Iliffe Steve, Whincup Peter H, Beighton Carole, Ussher Michael, Limb Elizabeth S, David Lee, Brewin Debbie, Adams Fredrika, Rogers Annabelle, Cook Derek G

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary's University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2015 Feb 17;12(2):e1001783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783. eCollection 2015 Feb.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001783
PMID:25689364
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4331517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Brisk walking in older people can increase step-counts and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) in ≥10-minute bouts, as advised in World Health Organization guidelines. Previous interventions have reported step-count increases, but not change in objectively measured MVPA in older people. We assessed whether a primary care nurse-delivered complex intervention increased objectively measured step-counts and MVPA. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A total of 988 60-75 year olds, able to increase walking and randomly selected from three UK family practices, were invited to participate in a parallel two-arm cluster randomised trial; randomisation was by household. Two-hundred-ninety-eight people from 250 households were randomised between 2011 and 2012; 150 individuals to the intervention group, 148 to the usual care control group. Intervention participants received four primary care nurse physical activity (PA) consultations over 3 months, incorporating behaviour change techniques, pedometer step-count and accelerometer PA intensity feedback, and an individual PA diary and plan. Assessors were not blinded to group status, but statistical analyses were conducted blind. The primary outcome was change in accelerometry assessed average daily step-counts between baseline and 3 months, with change at 12 months a secondary outcome. Other secondary outcomes were change from baseline in time in MVPA weekly in ≥10-minute bouts, accelerometer counts, and counts/minute at 3 months and 12 months. Other outcomes were adverse events, anthropometric measures, mood, and pain. Qualitative evaluations of intervention participants and practice nurses assessed the intervention's acceptability. At 3 months, eight participants had withdrawn or were lost to follow-up, 280 (94%) individuals provided primary outcome data. At 3 months changes in both average daily step-counts and weekly MVPA in ≥10-minute bouts were significantly higher in the intervention than control group: by 1,037 (95% CI 513-1,560) steps/day and 63 (95% CI 40-87) minutes/week, respectively. At 12 months corresponding differences were 609 (95% CI 104-1,115) steps/day and 40 (95% CI 17-63) minutes/week. Counts and counts/minute showed similar effects to steps and MVPA. Adverse events, anthropometry, mood, and pain were similar in the two groups. Participants and practice nurses found the intervention acceptable and enjoyable. CONCLUSIONS: The PACE-Lift trial increased both step-counts and objectively measured MVPA in ≥10-minute bouts in 60-75 year olds at 3 and 12 months, with no effect on adverse events. To our knowledge, this is the first trial in this age group to demonstrate objective MVPA increases and highlights the value of individualised support incorporating objective PA assessment in a primary care setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN42122561.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e934/4331517/192470c6c20d/pmed.1001783.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e934/4331517/f06c392ea9e3/pmed.1001783.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e934/4331517/192470c6c20d/pmed.1001783.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e934/4331517/f06c392ea9e3/pmed.1001783.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e934/4331517/192470c6c20d/pmed.1001783.g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A primary care nurse-delivered walking intervention in older adults: PACE (pedometer accelerometer consultation evaluation)-Lift cluster randomised controlled trial.

PLoS Med. 2015-2-17

[2]
A pedometer-based walking intervention in 45- to 75-year-olds, with and without practice nurse support: the PACE-UP three-arm cluster RCT.

Health Technol Assess. 2018-6

[3]
Physical activity levels in adults and older adults 3-4 years after pedometer-based walking interventions: Long-term follow-up of participants from two randomised controlled trials in UK primary care.

PLoS Med. 2018-3-9

[4]
Effect of a Primary Care Walking Intervention with and without Nurse Support on Physical Activity Levels in 45- to 75-Year-Olds: The Pedometer And Consultation Evaluation (PACE-UP) Cluster Randomised Clinical Trial.

PLoS Med. 2017-1-3

[5]
Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.

BMC Public Health. 2013-1-4

[6]
PACE-UP (Pedometer and consultation evaluation--UP)--a pedometer-based walking intervention with and without practice nurse support in primary care patients aged 45-75 years: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Trials. 2013-12-5

[7]
Relating process evaluation measures to complex intervention outcomes: findings from the PACE-UP primary care pedometer-based walking trial.

Trials. 2018-1-22

[8]
Short-term and long-term cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based exercise intervention in primary care: a within-trial analysis and beyond-trial modelling.

BMJ Open. 2018-10-17

[9]
Measuring change in trials of physical activity interventions: a comparison of self-report questionnaire and accelerometry within the PACE-UP trial.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019-1-22

[10]
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.

Health Technol Assess. 2020-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Wearable Activity Tracker-Based Interventions for Physical Activity, Body Composition, and Physical Function Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

J Med Internet Res. 2025-4-3

[2]
Behaviour change techniques used in interventions targeting dementia risk factors amongst older adults in rural and remote areas: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025-4

[3]
Insights from older adults' lived experience of physical activity and exercise during the COVID-19 lockdown in England.

Front Sports Act Living. 2024-10-31

[4]
Efficacy of a Wearable Activity Tracker With Step-by-Step Goal-Setting on Older Adults' Physical Activity and Sarcopenia Indicators: Clustered Trial.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-11-1

[5]
The Effect of Walking on Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024-7-23

[6]
Effectiveness of pedometer-based walking programmes in improving some modifiable risk factors of stroke among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review, theoretical synthesis and meta-analysis.

BMC Geriatr. 2024-6-13

[7]
Follow-up of individualised physical activity on prescription and individualised advice in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial.

Clin Rehabil. 2024-6

[8]
Let's Walk: A Quasi-Experimental Multi-Component Intervention to Improve Physical Activity and Social Engagement for Older Chinese American Adults.

J Immigr Minor Health. 2024-8

[9]
Enhancing Physical and Psychosocial Health of Older Adults in Saudi Arabia through Walking: Comparison between Supervised Group-Based and Non-Supervised Individual-Based Walking.

Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023-10-26

[10]
Physical Activity Intervention for Leisure-Time Activity Levels Among Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2023-9-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Which older people decline participation in a primary care trial of physical activity and why: insights from a mixed methods approach.

BMC Geriatr. 2014-4-12

[2]
Bias, precision and statistical power of analysis of covariance in the analysis of randomized trials with baseline imbalance: a simulation study.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014-4-9

[3]
Effectiveness of general practice-based physical activity promotion for older adults: systematic review.

Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014-4

[4]
Are behavioral interventions effective in increasing physical activity at 12 to 36 months in adults aged 55 to 70 years? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Med. 2013-3-19

[5]
Effect of varying accelerometry criteria on physical activity: the look ahead study.

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013-1

[6]
Randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention by primary care nurses to increase walking in patients aged 60-74 years: protocol of the PACE-Lift (Pedometer Accelerometer Consultation Evaluation - Lift) trial.

BMC Public Health. 2013-1-4

[7]
Increasing older adults' walking through primary care: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Fam Pract. 2012-7-28

[8]
Does physical activity counselling enhance the effects of a pedometer-based intervention over the long-term: 12-month findings from the Walking for Wellbeing in the west study.

BMC Public Health. 2012-3-19

[9]
A short-term physical activity randomized trial in the Lower Mississippi Delta.

PLoS One. 2011-10-25

[10]
How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011-7-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索