为患有慢性疾病的不活跃成年人的运动推荐计划添加基于网络的行为支持:e-coachER RCT。
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.
机构信息
Faculty of Health, Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
出版信息
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(63):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta24630.
BACKGROUND
There is modest evidence that exercise referral schemes increase physical activity in inactive individuals with chronic health conditions. There is a need to identify additional ways to improve the effects of exercise referral schemes on long-term physical activity.
OBJECTIVES
To determine if adding the e-coachER intervention to exercise referral schemes is more clinically effective and cost-effective in increasing physical activity after 1 year than usual exercise referral schemes.
DESIGN
A pragmatic, multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial, with a mixed-methods process evaluation and health economic analysis. Participants were allocated in a 1 : 1 ratio to either exercise referral schemes plus e-coachER (intervention) or exercise referral schemes alone (control).
SETTING
Patients were referred to exercise referral schemes in Plymouth, Birmingham and Glasgow.
PARTICIPANTS
There were 450 participants aged 16-74 years, with a body mass index of 30-40 kg/m, with hypertension, prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, lower limb osteoarthritis or a current/recent history of treatment for depression, who were also inactive, contactable via e-mail and internet users.
INTERVENTION
e-coachER was designed to augment exercise referral schemes. Participants received a pedometer and fridge magnet with physical activity recording sheets, and a user guide to access the web-based support in the form of seven 'steps to health'. e-coachER aimed to build the use of behavioural skills (e.g. self-monitoring) while strengthening favourable beliefs in the importance of physical activity, competence, autonomy in physical activity choices and relatedness. All participants were referred to a standard exercise referral scheme.
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE
Minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity in ≥ 10-minute bouts measured by an accelerometer over 1 week at 12 months, worn ≥ 16 hours per day for ≥ 4 days including ≥ 1 weekend day.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Other accelerometer-derived physical activity measures, self-reported physical activity, exercise referral scheme attendance and EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were collected at 4 and 12 months post randomisation.
RESULTS
Participants had a mean body mass index of 32.6 (standard deviation) 4.4 kg/m, were referred primarily for weight loss and were mostly confident self-rated information technology users. Primary outcome analysis involving those with usable data showed a weak indicative effect in favour of the intervention group ( = 108) compared with the control group ( = 124); 11.8 weekly minutes of moderate and vigorous physical activity (95% confidence interval -2.1 to 26.0 minutes; = 0.10). Sixty-four per cent of intervention participants logged on at least once; they gave generally positive feedback on the web-based support. The intervention had no effect on other physical activity outcomes, exercise referral scheme attendance (78% in the control group vs. 75% in the intervention group) or EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, but did enhance a number of process outcomes (i.e. confidence, importance and competence) compared with the control group at 4 months, but not at 12 months. At 12 months, the intervention group incurred an additional mean cost of £439 (95% confidence interval -£182 to £1060) compared with the control group, but generated more quality-adjusted life-years (mean 0.026, 95% confidence interval 0.013 to 0.040), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of an additional £16,885 per quality-adjusted life-year.
LIMITATIONS
A significant proportion (46%) of participants were not included in the primary analysis because of study withdrawal and insufficient device wear-time, so the results must be interpreted with caution. The regression model fit for the primary outcome was poor because of the considerable proportion of participants [142/243 (58%)] who recorded no instances of ≥ 10-minute bouts of moderate and vigorous physical activity at 12 months post randomisation.
FUTURE WORK
The design and rigorous evaluation of cost-effective and scalable ways to increase exercise referral scheme uptake and maintenance of moderate and vigorous physical activity are needed among patients with chronic conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
Adding e-coachER to usual exercise referral schemes had only a weak indicative effect on long-term rigorously defined, objectively assessed moderate and vigorous physical activity. The provision of the e-coachER support package led to an additional cost and has a 63% probability of being cost-effective based on the UK threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. The intervention did improve some process outcomes as specified in our logic model.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15644451.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 24, No. 63. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
背景
有一些证据表明,运动推荐计划可以增加患有慢性疾病的不活跃人群的身体活动量。需要确定其他方法来提高运动推荐计划对长期身体活动的影响。
目的
确定在 1 年时,与常规运动推荐计划相比,向运动推荐计划中添加电子教练 ER 干预措施是否更能有效增加身体活动量并具有成本效益。
设计
这是一项务实的、多中心、两臂随机对照试验,采用混合方法过程评估和健康经济分析。参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分配到运动推荐计划加电子教练 ER(干预组)或运动推荐计划单独组(对照组)。
地点
患者在普利茅斯、伯明翰和格拉斯哥被推荐到运动推荐计划。
参与者
有 450 名年龄在 16-74 岁之间、身体质量指数为 30-40kg/m、患有高血压、前驱糖尿病、2 型糖尿病、下肢骨关节炎或目前/最近接受过抑郁症治疗的参与者,他们也不活跃,可以通过电子邮件和互联网联系。
干预措施
电子教练 ER 旨在增强运动推荐计划。参与者收到计步器和冰箱磁铁,上面附有物理活动记录单,以及用户指南,可通过七个“迈向健康的步骤”访问基于网络的支持。电子教练 ER 旨在建立使用行为技能(例如自我监测),同时增强对身体活动重要性、能力、身体活动选择自主性和关联性的有利信念。所有参与者都被推荐到标准运动推荐计划。
主要结局测量
使用加速度计在 1 周内至少 10 分钟的中度和剧烈身体活动分钟数,每天至少佩戴 16 小时,至少包括 1 个周末,至少佩戴 4 天,包括至少 1 个周末。
次要结局测量
其他加速度计衍生的身体活动测量、自我报告的身体活动、运动推荐计划参与度以及 EuroQol-5 维度,五个等级版本,和医院焦虑和抑郁量表评分在随机分组后 4 个月和 12 个月进行收集。
结果
参与者的平均身体质量指数为 32.6(标准差 4.4)kg/m,主要是为了减肥而被推荐,并且大多是自信的自我评估信息技术用户。主要结局分析包括那些有可用数据的参与者,结果显示干预组(n=108)与对照组(n=124)相比,倾向于有微弱的有利效果;每周中度和剧烈身体活动增加 11.8 分钟(95%置信区间 -2.1 至 26.0 分钟; = 0.10)。64%的干预组参与者至少登录过一次;他们对基于网络的支持给予了普遍的积极反馈。该干预措施对其他身体活动结局、运动推荐计划参与度(对照组为 78%,干预组为 75%)或 EuroQol-5 维度,五个等级版本,或医院焦虑和抑郁量表评分均无影响,但与对照组相比,在 4 个月时增强了许多过程结局(即信心、重要性和能力),但在 12 个月时没有。在 12 个月时,与对照组相比,干预组的额外平均成本为 439 英镑(95%置信区间 -182 至 1060 英镑),但产生了更多的质量调整生命年(平均 0.026,95%置信区间 0.013 至 0.040),增量成本效益比为每增加一个质量调整生命年额外花费 16885 英镑。
局限性
由于研究退出和设备佩戴时间不足,相当一部分(46%)参与者未纳入主要分析,因此结果必须谨慎解释。由于相当一部分参与者(142/243 [58%])在随机分组后 12 个月内没有记录到任何 10 分钟以上的中度和剧烈身体活动,因此主要结局的回归模型拟合度较差。
未来工作
需要设计和严格评估具有成本效益和可扩展的方法,以提高慢性疾病患者对运动推荐计划的参与度,并维持中度和剧烈身体活动。
结论
向常规运动推荐计划中添加电子教练 ER 对长期严格定义的、客观评估的中度和剧烈身体活动仅具有微弱的指示性影响。提供电子教练 ER 支持包会导致额外的成本,并且基于英国 30000 英镑/质量调整生命年的阈值,有 63%的可能性具有成本效益。该干预措施确实改善了我们逻辑模型中规定的一些过程结局。
试验注册
当前对照试验 ISRCTN81542004。
资金
本项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在 ; Vol. 24, No. 63 中全文发表。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。