Shen Feng, Zheng Rui-Dan, Shi Jun-Ping, Mi Yu-Qiang, Chen Guo-Feng, Hu Xiqi, Liu Yong-Gang, Wang Xiao-Ying, Pan Qin, Chen Guang-Yu, Chen Jian-Neng, Xu Liang, Zhang Rui-Nan, Xu Lei-Ming, Fan Jian-Gao
Department of Gastroenterology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Research and Therapy Centre for Liver Disease, Zhengxing Hospital, Zhangzhou, China.
Liver Int. 2015 Nov;35(11):2392-400. doi: 10.1111/liv.12809. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non-invasive method for evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, larger skin capsular distance (SCD) can affect the accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SCD on the diagnostic performance of CAP and liver stiffness measurement (LSM).
Of 101 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 280 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who underwent liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. CAP, LSM and SCD were performed using FibroScan with M probe. The areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) were calculated to determine the diagnostic efficacy. The optimal thresholds were defined by the maximum Youden index.
SCD (B 30.34, P < 0.001) and hepatic steatosis (B 23.04, P < 0.001) were independently associated with CAP by multivariate analysis. The AUROCs were slightly higher for SCD <25 mm compared to those for SCD ≥25 mm for steatosis ≥5% (0.88 vs. 0.81), >33% (0.90 vs. 0.85) and >66% (0.84 vs. 0.72). For SCD <25 mm, the optimal CAP cut-offs for differentiating steatosis ≥5%, >33% and >66% were 255.0 dB/m, 283.5 dB/m and 293.5 dB/m. However, cut-offs were elevated by approximately 60-70 dB/m for SCD ≥25 mm. When stratified by fibrosis grade, LSM was significantly affected by SCD ≥25 mm for advanced fibrosis (≥F3) in NAFLD, but not in CHB.
CAP is a promising tool for detecting and quantifying hepatic steatosis. SCD ≥25 mm may cause overestimation of steatosis. Similarly, SCD ≥25 mm affects the detection of advanced fibrosis by LSM in NAFLD patients.
受控衰减参数(CAP)是一种评估肝脂肪变性的非侵入性方法。然而,较大的皮肤-包膜距离(SCD)会影响其准确性。本研究旨在探讨SCD对CAP诊断性能及肝脏硬度测量(LSM)的影响。
前瞻性纳入101例非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)患者和280例慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者,这些患者均接受了肝脏活检。使用配备M探头的FibroScan进行CAP、LSM和SCD检测。计算受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)以确定诊断效能。通过最大约登指数确定最佳阈值。
多因素分析显示,SCD(β 30.34,P < 0.001)和肝脂肪变性(β 23.04,P < 0.001)与CAP独立相关。对于脂肪变性≥5%、>33%和>66%的情况,SCD < 25 mm时的AUROC略高于SCD≥25 mm时(分别为0.88对0.81、0.90对0.85和0.84对0.72)。对于SCD < 25 mm,区分脂肪变性≥5%、>33%和>66%的最佳CAP截断值分别为255.0 dB/m、283.5 dB/m和293.5 dB/m。然而,SCD≥25 mm时截断值升高约60 - 70 dB/m。按纤维化分级分层时,在NAFLD中,SCD≥25 mm对晚期纤维化(≥F3)的LSM有显著影响,但在CHB中无此影响。
CAP是检测和量化肝脂肪变性的有前景的工具。SCD≥25 mm可能导致脂肪变性高估。同样,SCD≥25 mm影响NAFLD患者中LSM对晚期纤维化的检测。