• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用经济评估证据将癌症幸存者研究转化为医疗照护。

Applying evidence from economic evaluations to translate cancer survivorship research into care.

作者信息

de Moor Janet S, Alfano Catherine M, Breen Nancy, Kent Erin E, Rowland Julia

机构信息

Health Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3E438, MSC 9764, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9764, USA,

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):560-6. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0433-3. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-015-0433-3
PMID:25689963
Abstract

PURPOSE

This paper summarizes recommendations stemming from the meeting, Applying Evidence from Economic Evaluations to Translate Cancer Survivorship Research into Care, hosted by the National Cancer Institute.

METHODS

The meeting convened funded investigators, experts in cancer control, survivorship, health economics, and team science to identify the economic and health services data needed to facilitate the dissemination of cancer survivorship interventions into care and how survivorship and health economic investigators can successfully collaborate together and with other stakeholders.

RESULTS

Recommendations from the meeting are as follows. First, investigators must engage key stakeholders early in the planning process to understand the outcomes and cost domains on which they base decisions. Second, evaluations of intervention efficacy and value should be conducted using standardized and comparable measures and analytic approaches to enable comparisons across studies. Finally, a health economist should be included during the planning phase of the study so that the economic evaluation is pursued in concert with the survivorship intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Economic analyses, from the perspective of key stakeholders, must be incorporated into survivorship intervention research. The results from these analyses should be disseminated in a manner that is transparent, accessible, and comparable across studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

To optimize cancer survivors' health and quality of life, it is essential deliver high-quality and high-value care. Incorporating economic analyses into survivorship intervention research can inform the translation of effective interventions into practice.

摘要

目的

本文总结了由美国国立癌症研究所主办的“将经济评估证据应用于将癌症幸存者研究转化为护理”会议所产生的建议。

方法

该会议召集了获得资助的研究人员、癌症控制、幸存者护理、卫生经济学和团队科学方面的专家,以确定促进将癌症幸存者干预措施推广到护理中所需的经济和卫生服务数据,以及幸存者护理和卫生经济研究人员如何能够成功地相互协作并与其他利益相关者合作。

结果

会议的建议如下。首先,研究人员必须在规划过程的早期就与关键利益相关者合作,以了解他们做出决策所依据的结果和成本领域。其次,应使用标准化和可比的措施及分析方法对干预效果和价值进行评估,以便能够在各项研究之间进行比较。最后,应在研究的规划阶段纳入一名卫生经济学家,以便经济评估与幸存者护理干预措施同步进行。

结论

必须从关键利益相关者的角度将经济分析纳入幸存者护理干预研究。这些分析的结果应以透明、易于获取且在各项研究之间具有可比性的方式进行传播。

对癌症幸存者的意义

为了优化癌症幸存者的健康和生活质量,提供高质量和高价值的护理至关重要。将经济分析纳入幸存者护理干预研究可以为将有效干预措施转化为实践提供信息。

相似文献

1
Applying evidence from economic evaluations to translate cancer survivorship research into care.应用经济评估证据将癌症幸存者研究转化为医疗照护。
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Sep;9(3):560-6. doi: 10.1007/s11764-015-0433-3. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
2
An action plan for translating cancer survivorship research into care.将癌症幸存者研究转化为护理的行动计划。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 22;106(11). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju287. Print 2014 Nov.
3
Evidence Gaps in Cancer Survivorship Care: A Report From the 2019 National Cancer Institute Cancer Survivorship Workshop.癌症生存者照护中的证据缺口:来自 2019 年国家癌症研究所癌症生存者研讨会的报告。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Sep 4;113(9):1136-1142. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab049.
4
Survivorship care planning after the institute of medicine recommendations: how are we faring?医学研究所建议后的生存护理计划:我们进展如何?
J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Dec;5(4):358-70. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0196-4. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
5
Educating health care professionals to provide institutional changes in cancer survivorship care.教育医疗保健专业人员,以实现癌症幸存者护理方面的机构变革。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(2):226-32. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0314-7.
6
How confident are young adult cancer survivors in managing their survivorship care? A report from the LIVESTRONG™ Survivorship Center of Excellence Network.年轻癌症幸存者对管理其生存护理的信心如何?来自 LIVESTRONG 生存中心卓越网络的报告。
J Cancer Surviv. 2011 Dec;5(4):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s11764-011-0199-1. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
7
Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.结直肠癌和肺癌治疗后增强幸存者能力:自我管理幸存者护理计划干预的试点研究
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Aug;29:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Survivorship for Individuals Living With Advanced and Metastatic Cancers: National Cancer Institute Meeting Report.晚期和转移性癌症患者的生存状况:美国国家癌症研究所会议报告。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Apr 11;114(4):489-495. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab223.
9
Survivorship Science at the NIH: Lessons Learned From Grants Funded in Fiscal Year 2016.美国国立卫生研究院的生存科学:2016 财年资助项目中得到的经验教训。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Feb 1;111(2):109-117. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy208.
10
Transitioning patients to survivorship care: a systematic review.将患者过渡到癌症 survivorship 护理:一项系统综述。 (注:这里“survivorship care”直译为“癌症 survivorship 护理”,“癌症 survivorship”指癌症患者在治疗后进入的长期生存阶段,包括对患者身体、心理、社会等多方面的支持护理,是医学领域特定术语,中文表述可能因语境和专业习惯略有差异)
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Nov 1;41(6):615-25. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.615-625.

引用本文的文献

1
Provision of integrated psychosocial services for cancer survivors post-treatment.为癌症幸存者治疗后提供综合心理社会服务。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jan;18(1):e39-e50. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30659-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records.利益相关者的参与:将基因组信息整合到电子健康记录中的关键组成部分。
Genet Med. 2013 Oct;15(10):792-801. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.127. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
2
Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States.面向公共卫生研究人员的推广设计:来自美国全国性调查的研究结果。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):1693-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301165. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
3
Can't see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning.
只见护理计划,不见整体情况:呼吁重新审视护理计划的背景。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2651-3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4618. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
4
The efficacy of psychosocial intervention for pain in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心理社会干预对乳腺癌患者和幸存者疼痛的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):675-90. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2503-4. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
5
Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors.针对成年癌症幸存者的多维康复计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD007730. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007730.pub2.
6
Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey.美国癌症幸存者的身心健康相关生活质量:2010 年全国健康访谈调查的人口估计。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Nov;21(11):2108-17. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0740. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
7
Effectiveness of multidimensional cancer survivor rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation in general: a systematic review.多维癌症康复的有效性和癌症康复的一般成本效益:系统评价。
Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1581-93. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0151. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
8
Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors.运动干预对癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.
9
Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement.利益相关者参与比较效果研究:界定有效参与的框架
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Mar;1(2):181-194. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.7.
10
A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.一种新的利益相关者参与以患者为中心的结局研究的分类法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):985-91. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2037-1. Epub 2012 Apr 13.