Thygesen Lau C, Christiansen Terkel, Garcia-Armesto Sandra, Angulo-Pueyo Ester, Martínez-Lizaga Natalia, Bernal-Delgado Enrique
1 National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark Copenhagen, Denmark.
2 Centre of Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark Odense, Denmark.
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25 Suppl 1:35-43. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku227.
Potentially avoidable hospitalizations in chronic conditions are used to evaluate health-care performance. However, evidence comparing different countries at small geographical areas is still scarce. The aim of the present study is to describe and discuss differences in rates and time-trends across health-care areas from five European countries.
Observational, ecological study, on virtually all discharges produced in five European countries between 2002 and 2009. Potentially avoidable hospitalizations were operationally defined as a joint indicator composed of six chronic conditions. Episodes flagged as potentially avoidable were allocated to 913 geographical health-care areas. Age-sex standardized rates and standardized hospitalization ratios, as well as several statistics of variation, were estimated.
Four hundred sixty-two thousand seven hundred and ninety-two episodes were flagged as potentially avoidable. Variation in rates across countries was notable, from 93.7 cases per 10,000 inhabitants in Denmark to 34.8 cases per 10,000 inhabitants in Portugal. Within-country variation was also noteworthy, from 3.12 times among extreme areas in Spain to a 1.46-fold difference in Denmark. The highest systematic variation was found in Denmark (empirical Bayes 0.45) and the lowest in England (empirical Bayes 0.08). Rates and systematic variation remained fairly stable over time, with Denmark and England experiencing a statistically significant decrease (20% and 10%, respectively). Income and educational level, hospital utilization propensity, and region of residence were found to be associated with avoidable admissions.
The dramatic variation across countries, beyond age and sex differences, and its consistency over time, implies systemic, although differential, behaviour of the five health-care systems with regard to chronic care.
慢性病中潜在可避免的住院情况被用于评估医疗保健绩效。然而,在小地理区域比较不同国家的证据仍然很少。本研究的目的是描述和讨论五个欧洲国家各医疗保健区域在发生率和时间趋势方面的差异。
对2002年至2009年期间五个欧洲国家产生的几乎所有出院病例进行观察性生态研究。潜在可避免的住院在操作上被定义为一个由六种慢性病组成的联合指标。被标记为潜在可避免的病例被分配到913个地理医疗保健区域。估计了年龄-性别标准化率和标准化住院率,以及几个变异统计量。
462,792例病例被标记为潜在可避免。各国之间的发生率差异显著,从丹麦每10,000居民中的93.7例到葡萄牙每10,000居民中的34.8例。国家内部的差异也值得注意,西班牙极端地区之间相差3.12倍,丹麦相差1.46倍。丹麦的系统变异最高(经验贝叶斯值为0.45),英国最低(经验贝叶斯值为0.08)。随着时间的推移,发生率和系统变异保持相当稳定,丹麦和英国出现了统计学上显著的下降(分别为20%和10%)。发现收入和教育水平、医院利用倾向以及居住地区与可避免的住院有关。
各国之间除年龄和性别差异外的巨大差异及其随时间的一致性,意味着五个医疗保健系统在慢性病护理方面存在系统性的、尽管有所不同的行为。