• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家森林资源清查在更广泛应用于估算景观蔓延指标方面的潜力。

Potential for the wider application of national forest inventories to estimate the contagion metric for landscapes.

作者信息

Ramezani Habib, Ramezani Farhad

机构信息

Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SLU, SE-901 83, Umeå, Sweden,

出版信息

Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Mar;187(3):116. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4283-2. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s10661-015-4283-2
PMID:25690607
Abstract

National forest inventories (NFIs) have traditionally been designed to assess the production value of forests as well as forest biodiversity. However, in this study, the aim is to show a new application of NFIs, namely the estimation of the landscape metric contagion. This metric is commonly calculated on raster-based land cover/use maps. In this study, a sample-based dataset from the Swedish NFI was used. The estimated contagion metric is based on a distance-dependent function so that the value of the metric is small for longer distances, whereas the corresponding estimated variance is large for longer distances. With this procedure, comparisons can be made for different landscapes at a given time and or to compare any given landscape over time. The main advantages are that the approach can be applied where raster-based land cover/use maps of the landscape are not available and that the data obtained from NFIs (e.g., land cover type) typically are of high quality in comparison with remotely sensed data due to being based on direct observation in the field survey. The procedure applied here accommodates both the patch-mosaic and the gradient-based model approach to landscape structure.

摘要

国家森林资源清查(NFIs)传统上旨在评估森林的生产价值以及森林生物多样性。然而,在本研究中,目的是展示国家森林资源清查的一种新应用,即景观指标蔓延度的估算。该指标通常是在基于栅格的土地覆盖/利用地图上计算的。在本研究中,使用了来自瑞典国家森林资源清查的基于样本的数据集。估算的蔓延度指标基于距离相关函数,因此对于较长距离该指标的值较小,而相应的估算方差对于较长距离则较大。通过此程序,可以在给定时间对不同景观进行比较,或者比较任何给定景观随时间的变化。主要优点是该方法可以应用于没有景观的基于栅格的土地覆盖/利用地图的情况,并且与遥感数据相比,从国家森林资源清查中获得的数据(例如土地覆盖类型)通常由于基于实地调查中的直接观测而具有高质量。这里应用的程序兼顾了景观结构的斑块镶嵌和基于梯度的模型方法。

相似文献

1
Potential for the wider application of national forest inventories to estimate the contagion metric for landscapes.国家森林资源清查在更广泛应用于估算景观蔓延指标方面的潜力。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Mar;187(3):116. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4283-2. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
2
Extending large-scale forest inventories to assess urban forests.将大规模森林清查扩展到评估城市森林。
Environ Monit Assess. 2012 Mar;184(3):1409-22. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2050-6. Epub 2011 May 5.
3
Exploring characteristics of national forest inventories for integration with global space-based forest biomass data.探索国家森林清查与全球天基森林生物量数据集成的特点。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Dec 1;850:157788. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157788. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
4
Improving the precision of sample-based forest damage inventories through two-phase sampling and post-stratification using remotely sensed auxiliary information.通过利用遥感辅助信息进行两阶段抽样和事后分层来提高基于样本的森林损害清查的精度。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Apr;188(4):213. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5208-4. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Forest restoration: a global dataset for biodiversity and vegetation structure.森林恢复:生物多样性和植被结构的全球数据集。
Ecology. 2016 Aug;97(8):2167. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1474.
6
Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research.人类改造的热带景观中的多种演替途径:来自森林演替、森林破碎化和景观生态学研究的新见解。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):326-340. doi: 10.1111/brv.12231. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Exploring the links between social metabolism and biodiversity distribution across landscape gradients: A regional-scale contribution to the land-sharing versus land-sparing debate.探索景观梯度上社会代谢与生物多样性分布之间的联系:对土地共享与土地保护辩论的区域尺度贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:1272-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.196. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
8
Changes in vegetation cover and composition in the Swedish mountain region.瑞典山区植被覆盖和组成的变化。
Environ Monit Assess. 2016 Aug;188(8):452. doi: 10.1007/s10661-016-5457-2. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Optimizing carbon storage and biodiversity protection in tropical agricultural landscapes.优化热带农业景观中的碳储存和生物多样性保护。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jul;20(7):2162-72. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12482. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
10
When does seed limitation matter for scaling up reforestation from patches to landscapes?从斑块到景观扩大造林规模时,种子限制何时重要?
Ecol Appl. 2016 Dec;26(8):2437-2448. doi: 10.1002/eap.1410. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS)--scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multiscale biodiversity monitoring system.瑞典国家景观清单 (NILS)——建立多尺度生物多样性监测系统的范围、设计和经验。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Feb;173(1-4):579-95. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1406-7. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
2
Monitoring landscape metrics by point sampling: accuracy in estimating Shannon's diversity and edge density.点采样监测景观指标:估计香农多样性和边缘密度的准确性。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 May;164(1-4):403-21. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0902-0. Epub 2009 May 5.
3
Ecology. Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs.
生态学。千年生态系统评估:研究需求。
Science. 2006 Oct 13;314(5797):257-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1131946.
4
Landscape fragmentation, biodiversity loss and the societal response. The long term consequences of our use of natural resources may be surprising and unpleasant.景观破碎化、生物多样性丧失与社会应对。我们利用自然资源的长期后果可能令人惊讶且不悦。
EMBO Rep. 2005 May;6(5):388-92. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400398.
5
A preliminary assessment of Montréal process indicators of forest fragmentation for the United States.美国蒙特利尔森林破碎化进程指标的初步评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2004 Feb;91(1-3):257-76. doi: 10.1023/b:emas.0000009240.65355.92.
6
Development and implementation of the Norwegian monitoring programme for agricultural landscapes.挪威农业景观监测计划的制定与实施。
J Environ Manage. 2002 Jan;64(1):49-63. doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0503.