Badawy Wanees M A, Gad El-Mawla Ebtessam K, Chedid Ahmed E F, Mustafa Ahmed H A
Department of Physical Therapy for Neuromuscular Disorder and its Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Military Medical Academy, Cairo, Egypt.
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):138-44. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.4.
Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common disorder of the vestibular system of the inner ear, which is a vital part of maintaining balance. Although the efficacy of the Epley maneuver-also known as the canalith repositioning maneuver (CRM)-is well established, data comparing CRM versus a hybrid treatment are lacking.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a hybrid treatment, the Gans repositioning maneuver (GRM) either with or without postmaneuver restrictions, compared with CRM on treatment of posterior canal BPPV (PC-BPPV).
Study design was a randomized controlled trial.
A total of 45 patients (30 males and 15 females) with unilateral PC-BPPV were randomly allocated to one of three equal groups on the basis of the date of the first visit with matched assignment for gender: a GRMR group (GRM with postmaneuver restrictions), a GRM group, and a CRM group.
Patients received weekly administration of the maneuver until resolution of symptoms. The Dix-Hallpike test was performed before treatment at every appointment, and finally after 1 mo from the last maneuver.
Nystagmus duration and vertigo intensity were recorded. The supine roll test was performed in case the Dix-Hallpike test was negative to test otoconial migration. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance, paired t-tests with a Bonferroni correction, and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.
All patients showed improvement within the groups, and PC-BPPV symptoms were resolved by an average of 2, 1.7, and 1.6 maneuvers for GRMR, GRM, and CRM, respectively, with no statistical differences among the three groups (p > 0.05). Only two patients had recurrence, and one patient had horizontal BPPV at 1 mo follow-up.
We demonstrated that the GRM as a new treatment is effective in treating PC-BPPV with no benefits to postmaneuver restrictions.
良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPPV)是内耳前庭系统最常见的疾病,而内耳前庭系统是维持平衡的重要部分。尽管Epley手法(也称为半规管结石复位手法,CRM)的疗效已得到充分证实,但比较CRM与综合治疗的数据却很缺乏。
本研究的目的是确定综合治疗——即有或没有手法后限制的甘斯复位手法(GRM),与CRM相比,对后半规管BPPV(PC-BPPV)的治疗效果。
研究设计为随机对照试验。
共有45例单侧PC-BPPV患者(30例男性和15例女性)根据首次就诊日期被随机分为三个相等的组,并按性别进行匹配分配:GRMR组(有手法后限制的GRM)、GRM组和CRM组。
患者每周接受一次手法治疗,直至症状缓解。每次预约治疗前均进行Dix-Hallpike试验,最后一次手法治疗后1个月进行该试验。
记录眼震持续时间和眩晕强度。如果Dix-Hallpike试验为阴性,则进行仰卧翻滚试验以测试耳石移位。数据采用重复测量方差分析、经Bonferroni校正的配对t检验和Spearman等级相关系数进行分析。
所有组内患者均有改善,GRMR组、GRM组和CRM组的PC-BPPV症状分别平均通过2次、1.7次和1.6次手法得到缓解,三组之间无统计学差异(p>0.05)。仅2例患者复发,1例患者在1个月随访时出现水平半规管BPPV。
我们证明,作为一种新的治疗方法,GRM在治疗PC-BPPV方面有效,手法后限制并无益处。