McClellan Nicole, Swanson Joseph M, Magnotti Louis J, Griffith Terry W, Wood G Christopher, Croce Martin A, Boucher Bradley A, Mueller Eric W, Fabian Timothy C
University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA.
University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, Memphis, TN, USA
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 May;49(5):515-22. doi: 10.1177/1060028015570466. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
Limited data exist on the role of adjunctive intraventricular (IVT) antibiotics for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) infections in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.
To evaluate differences in CNS infection cure rates for TBI patients who received adjunctive IVT antibiotics compared with intravenous (IV) antibiotics alone.
We retrospectively identified patients with TBI and bacterial CNS infections admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) from 1997 to 2013. Study patients received IV and IVT antibiotics, and control patients received IV antibiotics alone. Clinical and microbiological cure rates were determined from patient records, in addition to ICU and hospital lengths of stay (LOSs), ventilator days, and hospital mortality.
A total of 83 patients were enrolled (32 study and 51 control). The duration of IV antibiotics was similar in both groups (10 vs 12 days, P = 0.14), and the study group received IVT antibiotics for a median of 9 days. Microbiological cure rates were 84% and 82% in study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.95). Clinical cure rates were similar at all time points. No significant differences were seen in days of mechanical ventilation, ICU or hospital LOS, or hospital mortality. When only patients with external ventricular drains were compared, cure rates remained similar between groups.
TBI patients with CNS infections had similar microbiological and clinical cure rates whether they were treated with adjunctive IVT antibiotics or IV antibiotics alone. Shorter than recommended durations of antibiotic therapy still resulted in acceptable cure rates and similar clinically relevant outcomes.
关于辅助性脑室内(IVT)抗生素在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中枢神经系统(CNS)感染治疗中的作用,现有数据有限。
评估接受辅助性IVT抗生素治疗的TBI患者与仅接受静脉(IV)抗生素治疗的患者在CNS感染治愈率上的差异。
我们回顾性确定了1997年至2013年入住创伤重症监护病房(ICU)的TBI和细菌性CNS感染患者。研究患者接受IV和IVT抗生素治疗,对照患者仅接受IV抗生素治疗。除了ICU和医院住院时间(LOS)、呼吸机使用天数和医院死亡率外,还从患者记录中确定临床和微生物学治愈率。
共纳入83例患者(32例研究组和51例对照组)。两组IV抗生素的使用时间相似(10天对12天,P = 0.14),研究组接受IVT抗生素的中位时间为9天。研究组和对照组的微生物学治愈率分别为84%和82%(P = 0.95)。所有时间点的临床治愈率相似。在机械通气天数、ICU或医院住院时间或医院死亡率方面未观察到显著差异。当仅比较有外部脑室引流管的患者时,两组间治愈率仍相似。
患有CNS感染的TBI患者,无论接受辅助性IVT抗生素治疗还是仅接受IV抗生素治疗,其微生物学和临床治愈率相似。短于推荐疗程的抗生素治疗仍能产生可接受的治愈率和相似的临床相关结局。