• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Renal calculi: trends in the utilization of shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy.

作者信息

Seklehner Stephan, Laudano Melissa A, Del Pizzo Joseph, Chughtai Bilal, Lee Richard K

机构信息

Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA; Landesklinikum Baden-Mödling, Baden, Austria.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2015 Feb;22(1):7627-34.

PMID:25694010
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To assess trends in the usage of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) in the treatment of renal calculi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of the 5% Medicare Public Use Files (years 2001, 2004, 2007 and 2010) was performed to evaluate changes in the use of SWL and URS to treat renal calculi. Patients were identified using ICD-9 (cm) and CPT codes. Statistical analyses, including the Fisher, 2 tests, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS v20 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

The absolute number of patients diagnosed with (+85.1%) and treated for (+31.5%) kidney calculi increased from 2001 to 2010. The ratio of diagnosed/treated patients declined from 15.2% in 2001 to 10.8% in 2010. Whites (OR = 1.27, p < 0.0001), patients in the South (OR = 1.16, p < 0.0001) and those ≤ 84 years of age were more likely to be treated. The utilization of SWL (84.7%) was greater than URS (15.3%), but the utilization of URS increased over time from 8.4% in 2001 to 20.6% of cases by 2010 (p < 0.0001). Treatment via URS was more likely in women (OR = 1.28, p < 0.0001), in patients living outside the South (OR = 1.29-1.45, p ≤ 0.006) and in later years of the study (OR = 2.87, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment patterns for renal calculi changed from 2001 to 2010. The usage of URS increased at the cost of SWL. Multiple sociodemographic factors correlated with the likelihood of being treated surgically as well as the choice of the surgical approach.

摘要

相似文献

1
Renal calculi: trends in the utilization of shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy.
Can J Urol. 2015 Feb;22(1):7627-34.
2
Factors Associated with Regional Adoption of Ureteroscopy in California from 2005 to 2016.2005 年至 2016 年加利福尼亚州输尿管镜检查的区域应用相关因素。
J Endourol. 2019 Jan;33(1):9-15. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0776. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
3
Decreased Recurrence of Urolithiasis After Simultaneous Ureteroscopic Surgery for Ureter and Ipsilateral Renal Calculi: Comparison to Shockwave Lithotripsy for Ureter Calculi Alone.同期输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管和同侧肾结石后结石复发减少:与单独冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的比较。
Urology. 2021 Jan;147:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.10.041. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.体外冲击波碎石术与软性输尿管镜术治疗儿童上尿路结石的对比研究
J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313.
5
Cost-effectiveness comparison of renal calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.输尿管镜激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的成本效益比较。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):639-43. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0669. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
6
Opioid usage differs significantly following ureteroscopy and shockwave lithotripsy, while development of long-term usage is positively correlated with total days' supply and total MME supplied.输尿管镜检查和冲击波碎石术后阿片类药物的使用有显著差异,而长期使用的发展与总供应天数和总 MME 供应呈正相关。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Nov;54(11):2805-2811. doi: 10.1007/s11255-022-03313-2. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
7
Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石(TISU):一项多中心随机对照非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jul;80(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.044. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石儿童肾结石:多机构疗效和并发症的结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):516.e1-516.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Management patterns of medicare patients undergoing treatment for upper urinary tract calculi.医保患者上尿路结石治疗的管理模式。
J Endourol. 2014 Jun;28(6):723-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0580. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy Trends from 2012 to 2019 Within the US Medicare Dataset: Sharp Growth in Ureteroscopy Utilization.2012 年至 2019 年美国医疗保险数据集内的输尿管镜检查和体外冲击波碎石术趋势:输尿管镜检查利用率的急剧增长。
J Endourol. 2023 Feb;37(2):219-224. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0402. Epub 2022 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Urolithiasis in Germany: Trends from the National DRG Database.德国尿石症:国家诊断相关分组数据库的趋势。
Urol Int. 2022;106(6):589-595. doi: 10.1159/000520372. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Urolithiasis, Independent of Uric Acid, Increased Risk of Coronary Artery and Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.与尿酸无关的尿石症增加了冠状动脉和颈动脉粥样硬化的风险:一项观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 20;2020:1026240. doi: 10.1155/2020/1026240. eCollection 2020.
3
Numerical Response Surfaces of Volume of Ablation and Retropulsion Amplitude by Settings of Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripter.
钬激光碎石术参数设置的消融体积和后冲幅度的数值响应曲面
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Mar 7;2018:8261801. doi: 10.1155/2018/8261801. eCollection 2018.
4
Recent advances in understanding and managing urolithiasis.尿路结石诊治的最新进展
F1000Res. 2016 Nov 8;5:2651. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9570.1. eCollection 2016.
5
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) value changes before and after shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术前后中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)值的变化。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):347-351. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0932-3. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
6
Difference of opinion--In the era of flexible ureteroscopy is there still a place for Shock-wave lithotripsy? Opinion: NO.观点分歧——在输尿管软镜时代,冲击波碎石术是否仍有一席之地?观点:否。
Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Mar-Apr;41(2):203-6. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.04.