• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多级ProDisc-L植入术后椎体劈裂骨折的预防

Prevention of vertebral body-splitting fractures after multilevel ProDisc-L implantation.

作者信息

Sullivan Humbert G, Bertagnoli Rudolf, Nigogosyan Mark A, Ladwig Nicholas R, Born Hayley L, Cerniglia Molly M, Habbicht Hartmann, Mathiason Michelle A, McHugh Vicki L

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Gundersen Lutheran Health System, La Crosse, WI.

Department of Radiology, Gundersen Lutheran Health System, La Crosse, WI.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2012 Dec 1;6:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.12.004. eCollection 2012.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.12.004
PMID:25694877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4300882/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies of multilevel ProDisc-L (PD-L) implants (Synthes Spine, Inc., West Chester, Pennsylvania) using the standard US technique have used conventional radiography postoperatively. We found vertebral body-splitting fractures (VB-SFs) in interposed vertebral bodies after 5 sequential multilevel PD-L device implantations using the standard US technique. These were identified with postoperative computed tomography (CT) but were not visible on plain radiographs. In an additional patient, we found that a stress-relieving, pilot holes-only technique did not prevent VB-SFs. The 5 patients operated on with the standard technique composed the background series against which we compared the incidence of VB-SFs in patients operated on with a modification of the standard US technique-a combination of stress-relieving pilot holes, removal of cortex in the chisel path, and a fenestrated chisel (PH/CR/FC)-intended to reduce the incidence of VB-SFs in multilevel PD-L constructs.

METHODS

Patients receiving multilevel PD-L implants at 2 sites-1 in the United States and the other in Germany-were operated on with the PH/CR/FC technique and their postoperative CT scans evaluated for the presence of VB-SFs. The frequency of VB-SFs in these patients was compared with that of the 5 patients from the background series who were operated on by the standard US technique. The groups' mean sex, age, body mass index, and vertebral body height, as well as average spinal T score, were also compared.

RESULTS

No fractures were found in 13 interposed vertebral bodies in 11 patients operated on with the PH/CR/FC technique, as compared with 4 VB-SFs and 1 anterior keel cut-to-anterior keel cut fracture in 5 interposed vertebral bodies in 5 patients operated on with the US technique (P ≤ .001). Although the sample sizes were small, this difference in fracture rate was not associated with sex, age, body mass index, or average spinal T score. At up to 13 months of follow-up of patients in the background series, we found that VB-SFs tend not to bridge with bone, instead forming sclerotic margins.

CONCLUSIONS

The PH/CR/FC technique studied reduced the incidence of VB-SF in multilevel PD-L implants. Because previously published multilevel studies did not use postoperative CT scans and because VB-SFs are not visible on conventional radiography, the incidence of VB-SFs in multilevel PD-L applications may be higher than previously reported. Our findings may contribute to prevention of complications in total disc replacement.

摘要

背景

此前关于多级ProDisc-L(PD-L)植入物(美国宾夕法尼亚州韦斯特切斯特的Synthes Spine公司)使用标准美国技术的研究,术后采用的是传统放射成像。我们在连续5例使用标准美国技术植入多级PD-L装置后,发现置入椎体出现椎体劈裂骨折(VB-SF)。这些骨折通过术后计算机断层扫描(CT)得以识别,但在平片上不可见。在另一例患者中,我们发现一种仅钻导向孔以缓解应力的技术并不能预防VB-SF。采用标准技术手术的5例患者构成了背景系列,我们将其与采用标准美国技术改良术式——一种结合了缓解应力导向孔、凿骨路径去皮质及开窗凿(PH/CR/FC)——手术的患者的VB-SF发生率进行比较,该改良术式旨在降低多级PD-L结构中VB-SF的发生率。

方法

在美国和德国两个地点接受多级PD-L植入的患者采用PH/CR/FC技术进行手术,并对其术后CT扫描评估是否存在VB-SF。将这些患者的VB-SF发生频率与背景系列中采用标准美国技术手术的5例患者进行比较。还比较了两组患者的平均性别、年龄、体重指数、椎体高度以及平均脊柱T值。

结果

采用PH/CR/FC技术手术的11例患者的13个置入椎体未发现骨折,而采用美国技术手术的5例患者的5个置入椎体出现4例VB-SF和1例从前侧骨嵴切迹到前侧骨嵴切迹的骨折(P≤0.001)。尽管样本量较小,但骨折率的这种差异与性别、年龄、体重指数或平均脊柱T值无关。对背景系列患者进行长达13个月的随访时,我们发现VB-SF往往不会与骨愈合,而是形成硬化边缘。

结论

所研究的PH/CR/FC技术降低了多级PD-L植入物中VB-SF的发生率。由于此前发表的多级研究未使用术后CT扫描,且VB-SF在传统放射成像上不可见,因此多级PD-L应用中VB-SF的发生率可能高于此前报道。我们的研究结果可能有助于预防全椎间盘置换中的并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/e4231a9fd83a/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/dc244a6e171d/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/33201ab6cba6/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/605ff1822393/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/56813212cb59/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/20364e4bd0a0/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/9a68f864eaf3/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/896cd58a4fbf/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/e4231a9fd83a/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/dc244a6e171d/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/33201ab6cba6/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/605ff1822393/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/56813212cb59/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/20364e4bd0a0/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/9a68f864eaf3/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/896cd58a4fbf/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c0f/4300882/e4231a9fd83a/IJSS-6-2011-12-004-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevention of vertebral body-splitting fractures after multilevel ProDisc-L implantation.多级ProDisc-L植入术后椎体劈裂骨折的预防
Int J Spine Surg. 2012 Dec 1;6:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.12.004. eCollection 2012.
2
Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.关于ProDisc-C全椎间盘置换术与前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗单节段有症状颈椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine J. 2009 Apr;9(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.006. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
3
Failure analysis of C-5 after total disc replacement with ProDisc-C at 1 and 2 levels and in combination with a fusion cage: finite-element and biomechanical models.使用ProDisc-C进行1级和2级全椎间盘置换并结合融合器后C-5的失效分析:有限元和生物力学模型
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jun;22(6):639-46. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14217. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
4
Posterior avulsion fracture at adjacent vertebral body during cervical disc replacement with ProDisc-C: a case report.
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Aug;20(6):468-72. doi: 10.1097/bsd.0b013e31803b95db.
5
Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases.使用ProDisc进行全椎间盘置换术后椎体垂直劈裂骨折:2例报告
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct;18(5):465-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159035.35365.df.
6
Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.关于ProDisc-L全椎间盘置换术与环形融合术治疗单节段退变性椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377.
7
The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.种植体大小和器械龙骨对腰椎全椎间盘置换中椎体压缩性能的影响。
Spine J. 2010 Apr;10(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.01.008.
8
Analysis of the spinal nerve roots in relation to the adjacent vertebral bodies with respect to a posterolateral vertebral body replacement procedure.关于椎体后外侧置换手术,分析脊神经根与相邻椎体的关系。
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):50-57. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.199869.
9
A comparison of patients who have undergone 1-Level versus 2-Level ProDisc arthroplasty: a prospective study with minimum of 5-year follow-up.1 节段与 2 节段 ProDisc 关节置换术治疗患者的比较:至少 5 年随访的前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jun 15;38(14):1194-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828b31e8.
10
The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.使用ProDisc假体进行全椎间盘置换术治疗致残性多节段腰椎间盘源性下腰痛:一项至少随访2年的前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Oct 1;30(19):2192-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000181061.43194.18.

引用本文的文献

1
ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design.人体尸体标本中的瞬时弹性模量:新型腰椎间盘假体设计中需考虑的一个重要参数。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Jul 20;2:100016. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100016. eCollection 2020 Aug.
2
We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.我们需要谈谈腰椎全椎间盘置换术。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Aug 3;12(2):201-240. doi: 10.14444/5029. eCollection 2018 Apr.
3
Physical capability outcomes after total disc replacement with ProDisc-L.使用ProDisc-L进行全椎间盘置换后的身体功能结果。

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease: results at twenty-four months.前瞻性、随机、多中心食品和药物管理局研究性设备豁免研究表明,ProDisc-L 全椎间盘置换与环锯式脊柱融合术治疗 2 级腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病相比:24 个月的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Apr 20;93(8):705-15. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00680. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
2
ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.ProDisc-L全椎间盘置换术:1节段与2节段置换术患者的比较,至少随访2年。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 1;32(21):2322-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557c06.
3
Int J Spine Surg. 2012 Dec 1;6:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.11.001. eCollection 2012.
Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.关于ProDisc-L全椎间盘置换术与环形融合术治疗单节段退变性椎间盘疾病的前瞻性、随机、多中心美国食品药品监督管理局研究性器械豁免研究结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 15;32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377.
4
Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.使用ProDisc假体对吸烟者与非吸烟者进行腰椎全椎间盘置换术:一项至少随访2年的前瞻性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):992-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214970.07626.68.
5
Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases.使用ProDisc进行全椎间盘置换术后椎体垂直劈裂骨折:2例报告
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Oct;18(5):465-9. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159035.35365.df.