Ptashnikov Dmitry, Zaborovskii Nikita, Mikhaylov Dmitry, Masevnin Sergei
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics Spinal Surgery and Oncology.
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1033. eCollection 2014.
Currently, there is no consensus about how to reduce the intraoperative risk of hemorrhage in spinal decompression surgery of hypervascular spinal tumors, such as aggressive hemangioma, multiple myeloma, plasmacytoma, metastasis of renal cell carcinoma.
A retrospective study of 110 patients, operated in our institute was held in the period between 2003 and 2013. There were 69 male and 41 female patients with extradural hypervascular spinal tumor. The study included 61 patients with metastasis of renal cell carcinoma, 27 with multiple myeloma, 15 with plasmacytoma and 7 with aggressive hemangioma. The first group included 57 patients who underwent preoperative tumor embolization. The second group consisted of 53 patients, which were treated surgically using intraoperative local hemostatic agents. We performed 2 types of treatment options: palliative decompression and total spondylectomy. The first group was divided into two subgroups: 30 patients with palliative decompression (1PD) and 27 with total spondylectomy (1TS). In the second group there were: 28 patients with palliative decompression (2PD) and 25 with total spondylectomy (2TS). The parameters under evaluation were the blood loss volume, drainage loss, operation time, hemoglobin level, possible complications and time of hospital stay.
The average intraoperative blood loss for all embolized patients was slightly less than in subgroups with local hemostatic agents. No significant difference in blood loss volume was found between groups 1PD and 2PD (p > 0.05). In groups 1TS and 2TS, we did get significant difference (p < 0.05). Statistically significant difference in the average drainage loss was found between two methods of hemostasis in both subgroups (p < 0.05). The operation time was not significantly different between groups. Postoperative hemoglobin level reduce is almost equal in both groups of patients. Postoperative complications were also nearly equal in the groups. The average hospital stay was significantly less (p < 0.05) in groups with 2PD and 2TS.
The research proves that for patients with hypervascular spinal tumors, who underwent palliative decompression, there is no significant difference between two methods of reducing blood loss. Therefore, we do not see reasons to use expensive and risky procedure of embolization for such patients. While for patients with total spondylectomy preoperative embolization is efficient to reduce intraoperative bleeding.
目前,对于如何降低高血运性脊柱肿瘤(如侵袭性血管瘤、多发性骨髓瘤、浆细胞瘤、肾细胞癌转移瘤)脊柱减压手术中的术中出血风险,尚无共识。
对2003年至2013年期间在我院接受手术的110例患者进行回顾性研究。有69例男性和41例女性患有硬膜外高血运性脊柱肿瘤。该研究包括61例肾细胞癌转移患者、27例多发性骨髓瘤患者、15例浆细胞瘤患者和7例侵袭性血管瘤患者。第一组包括57例接受术前肿瘤栓塞的患者。第二组由53例患者组成,他们在手术中使用术中局部止血剂进行治疗。我们进行了两种治疗方案:姑息性减压和全脊椎切除术。第一组分为两个亚组:30例接受姑息性减压(1PD)的患者和27例接受全脊椎切除术(1TS)的患者。第二组中有:28例接受姑息性减压(2PD)的患者和25例接受全脊椎切除术(2TS)的患者。评估的参数包括失血量、引流液量、手术时间、血红蛋白水平、可能的并发症和住院时间。
所有接受栓塞治疗的患者术中平均失血量略少于使用局部止血剂的亚组。1PD组和2PD组之间在失血量上未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。在1TS组和2TS组中,我们确实发现了显著差异(p<0.05)。在两个亚组中,两种止血方法在平均引流液量上均存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05)。两组之间手术时间无显著差异。两组患者术后血红蛋白水平下降几乎相同。两组术后并发症也几乎相同。2PD组和2TS组的平均住院时间明显更短(p<0.05)。
研究证明,对于接受姑息性减压的高血运性脊柱肿瘤患者,两种减少出血的方法之间没有显著差异。因此,我们认为没有理由对这类患者采用昂贵且有风险的栓塞手术。而对于接受全脊椎切除术的患者,术前栓塞可有效减少术中出血。