• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际脊柱侧凸研究学会政策声明 - 颈椎椎间融合器

ISASS Policy Statement - cervical interbody.

作者信息

Singh Kern, Qureshi Sheeraz

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Spine Insitute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1013. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.14444/1013
PMID:25694945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4325513/
Abstract

Morgan Lorio, MD, FACS, Chair, ISASS Task Force on Coding & Reimbursement In 2011, CPT code 22551 was revised to combine or bundle CPT codes 63075 and 22554 when both procedures were performed at the same site/same surgical session. The add on code +22552 is used to report each additional interspace. 2014 heralded a downward pressure on this now prime target code (for non-coverage?) 22551 through an egregious insurer attempt to redefine cervical arthrodesis, effectively removing spine surgeon choice and altering best practice without clinical evidence. Currently, spine surgeons are equally split on the use of allograft versus cages for cervical arthrodesis. Structural allograft, CPT code 20931, is reported once per same surgical session, regardless of the number of allografts used. CPT code 22851 which is designated solely for cage use, has a higher reimbursement than structural allograft, and may be reported for each inner space. Hence, the rationale behind why some payers wrongly consider "spine cages NOT medically necessary for cervical fusion." A timely consensus paper summarizing spine surgeon purview on the logical progressive evolution of cervical interbody fusion for ISASS/IASP membership was strategically identified as an advocacy focus by the ISASS Task Force. ISASS appreciates the authors' charge with gratitude. This article has both teeth and transparent clinical real-world merit.

摘要

摩根·洛里奥医学博士,美国外科学院院士,国际脊柱侧凸研究学会编码与报销特别工作组主席 2011年,CPT编码22551进行了修订,当两个手术在同一部位/同一手术过程中进行时,将CPT编码63075和22554合并或捆绑。附加编码+22552用于报告每个额外的间隙。2014年,由于保险公司试图重新定义颈椎融合术,对这个现在的主要目标编码(是否不涵盖?)22551施加了下行压力,这一行为在没有临床证据的情况下有效地剥夺了脊柱外科医生的选择并改变了最佳实践。目前,脊柱外科医生在颈椎融合术中使用同种异体骨与椎间融合器的问题上存在分歧。结构性同种异体骨,CPT编码20931,在同一手术过程中无论使用的同种异体骨数量多少都只报告一次。专门用于椎间融合器使用的CPT编码22851的报销费用高于结构性同种异体骨,并且每个内部间隙都可以报告。因此,一些支付方错误地认为“脊柱椎间融合器对于颈椎融合术并非医学必需”的背后原因。一份及时的共识文件,总结了脊柱外科医生对国际脊柱侧凸研究学会/国际疼痛研究学会成员颈椎椎间融合术合理渐进发展的权限,被国际脊柱侧凸研究学会特别工作组战略性地确定为倡导重点。国际脊柱侧凸研究学会感激地感谢作者承担此项任务。本文既有力度又有透明的临床现实价值。

相似文献

1
ISASS Policy Statement - cervical interbody.国际脊柱侧凸研究学会政策声明 - 颈椎椎间融合器
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1013. eCollection 2014.
2
ISASS Policy Statement - Cervical Artificial Disc.国际脊柱关节外科学会政策声明 - 颈椎人工椎间盘
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1006. eCollection 2014.
3
Paired Comparison Survey Analyses Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Code 27279.使用Rasch方法对CPT代码27279的相对难度和估计工作相对价值单位进行配对比较调查分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Dec 1;10:40. doi: 10.14444/3040. eCollection 2016.
4
Paired Comparison Survey Analysis Utilizing Rasch Methodology of the Relative Difficulty and Estimated Work Relative Value Units of CPT Code 0202T.使用Rasch方法对CPT代码0202T的相对难度和估计工作相对价值单位进行配对比较调查分析。
Int J Spine Surg. 2024 May 6;18(2):130-137. doi: 10.14444/8587.
5
Maintenance of interbody space in one- and two-level anterior cervical interbody fusion: comparison of the effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and cage.单节段和双节段颈椎前路椎间融合术中椎间间隙的维持:自体骨移植、异体骨移植和椎间融合器有效性的比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jan(430):108-16. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000142626.90278.9e.
6
Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.颈椎椎间融合器的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1850-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00007.
7
Biomechanical comparison of bioabsorbable cervical spine interbody fusion cages.可生物吸收颈椎椎间融合器的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Aug 15;29(16):1717-22. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134565.17078.4c.
8
The use of bone allografts in the spine.骨移植在脊柱中的应用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Mar(324):75-85. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199603000-00010.
9
Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease.用于颈椎间盘退变疾病的单节段或双节段前路椎间融合技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19(1):CD004958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004958.pub2.
10
ISASS Recommendations and Coverage Criteria for Bone Graft Substitutes used in Spinal Surgery.脊柱手术中骨移植替代物的ISASS建议和覆盖标准。
Int J Spine Surg. 2018 Dec 21;12(6):757-771. doi: 10.14444/5095. eCollection 2018 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for postoperative subsidence of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the significance of the preoperative cervical alignment.单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后沉降的危险因素:术前颈椎排列的意义
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jul 15;39(16):1280-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000400.
2
Health state utility of patients with single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical disc arthroplasty.单节段颈椎退行性疾病患者的健康状态效用:前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与颈椎间盘置换术的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 May;20(5):475-9. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13718. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
3
Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis.颈椎前路融合术后需要手术治疗的临床相邻节段病变的矢状位排列预测因素。
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.043. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
4
Risk factors for the development of adjacent segment disease following anterior cervical arthrodesis for degenerative cervical disease: comparison between fusion methods.退行性颈椎病前路椎间融合术后相邻节段疾病发生的危险因素:融合方法的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 May;21(5):794-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.07.028. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Anterior cervical fusion for radicular-disc conflict performed by three different procedures: clinical and radiographic analysis at long-term follow-up.采用三种不同手术方式进行的前路颈椎融合术治疗神经根性椎间盘冲突:长期随访的临床和影像学分析
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S905-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3006-z. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
6
Alternative grafts in anterior cervical fusion.颈椎前路融合术中的替代移植物。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Oct;115(10):2049-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
7
Polyetheretherketone interbody cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts with anterior fixation for cervical disc disease.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与自体髂嵴骨移植前路固定治疗颈椎间盘疾病的比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Apr;26(2):61-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182323274.
8
Organ donation, transplantation and religion.器官捐赠、移植与宗教。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Feb;26(2):437-44. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq628. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.聚醚醚酮生物材料在创伤、骨科和脊柱植入物中的应用。
Biomaterials. 2007 Nov;28(32):4845-69. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
10
A comparison of changes over time in cervical foraminal height after tricortical iliac graft or polyetheretherketone cage placement following anterior discectomy.前路椎间盘切除术后,三皮质髂骨移植或聚醚醚酮椎间融合器置入后颈椎椎间孔高度随时间变化的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jan;6(1):10-6. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.1.3.