在BLOCK HF试验中,双心室起搏与右心室起搏对房室传导阻滞合并心力衰竭患者左心室逆向重构的影响
Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling With Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block and Heart Failure in the BLOCK HF Trial.
作者信息
St John Sutton Martin, Plappert Ted, Adamson Philip B, Li Pei, Christman Shelly A, Chung Eugene S, Curtis Anne B
机构信息
From the Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (M.S.S., T.P.); Department of Medicine, Oklahoma Heart Hospital, Oklahoma City (P.B.A.); Medtronic, Inc, Mounds View, MN (P.L., S.A.C.); Department of Medicine, Ohio Heart and Vascular Center, Cincinnati (E.S.C.); and Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, NY (A.B.C.).
出版信息
Circ Heart Fail. 2015 May;8(3):510-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001626. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
BACKGROUND
Biventricular pacing in heart failure (HF) improves survival, relieves symptoms, and attenuates left ventricular (LV) remodeling. However, little is known about biventricular pacing in HF patients with atrioventricular block because they are typically excluded from biventricular trials.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) trial randomized patients with atrioventricular block, New York Heart Association symptom classes I to III HF, and LV ejection fraction ≤50% to biventricular or right ventricular pacing. Doppler echocardiograms were obtained at randomization (after 30 to 60 days of right ventricular pacing postimplant) and every 6 months through 24 months. Data analysis comparing changes in 10 prespecified echo parameters over time was conducted using a Bayesian design. LV end systolic volume index was also evaluated as a predictor of mortality/morbidity. Of 691 randomized subjects, 624 had paired Doppler echocardiogram data for ≥1 analyses at 6, 12, 18, or 24 months. Biventricular pacing significantly reduced LV volume indices and intraventricular mechanical delay, and improved LV ejection fraction, consistent with LV reverse remodeling. These parameters showed little change with right ventricular pacing alone, indicating no systematic reverse remodeling with right ventricular pacing. LV end systolic volume index was predictive of mortality/morbidity; the estimated risk increased up to 1% for every 1 mL/m(2) increase in LV end systolic volume index.
CONCLUSIONS
LV end systolic volume index is a significant predictor of mortality/morbidity in this population. Cardiac structure and function are improved with biventricular pacing for patients with atrioventricular block and LV systolic dysfunction.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00267098.
背景
心力衰竭(HF)患者的双心室起搏可改善生存率、缓解症状并减轻左心室(LV)重构。然而,对于患有房室传导阻滞的HF患者的双心室起搏知之甚少,因为他们通常被排除在双心室试验之外。
方法与结果
心力衰竭合并房室传导阻滞患者的双心室与右心室起搏(BLOCK HF)试验将患有房室传导阻滞、纽约心脏协会症状分级为I至III级HF且左心室射血分数≤50%的患者随机分为双心室起搏组或右心室起搏组。在随机分组时(植入后右心室起搏30至60天)以及每6个月直至24个月时获取多普勒超声心动图。使用贝叶斯设计对10个预先设定的回声参数随时间的变化进行数据分析比较。左心室收缩末期容积指数也被评估为死亡率/发病率的预测指标。在691名随机分组的受试者中,624人在6、12、18或24个月时有配对的多普勒超声心动图数据用于≥1次分析。双心室起搏显著降低了左心室容积指数和心室内机械延迟,并改善了左心室射血分数,与左心室逆向重构一致。这些参数在单纯右心室起搏时变化很小,表明右心室起搏没有系统性的逆向重构。左心室收缩末期容积指数可预测死亡率/发病率;左心室收缩末期容积指数每增加1 mL/m²,估计风险增加高达1%。
结论
左心室收缩末期容积指数是该人群死亡率/发病率的重要预测指标。对于患有房室传导阻滞和左心室收缩功能障碍的患者,双心室起搏可改善心脏结构和功能。