Suppr超能文献

痴呆症患者医疗互动中的沟通:观察性研究的系统评价

Communication in healthcare interactions in dementia: a systematic review of observational studies.

作者信息

Dooley Jemima, Bailey Cate, McCabe Rose

机构信息

Mental Health Research Group,University of Exeter Medical School,Exeter,Devon,UK.

Centre for Psychiatry,Queen Mary University of London,London,UK.

出版信息

Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Aug;27(8):1277-300. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214002890. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Communication is affected by dementia, even in the early stages. Studies directly observing how patients, companions and healthcare professionals communicate have not yet been reviewed.

METHODS

Eight databases were searched, and hand searches of relevant journals and grey literature were performed up to August 2014. Two authors reviewed abstracts independently and collectively reviewed for agreement of inclusion. Findings were narratively synthesized.

RESULTS

23 studies were identified observing: diagnostic, follow up, day center, primary care and research consent interactions. Companions were present in 14 studies. Three themes emerged: emotional impact of diagnosis, level of patient involvement and participant strategies to save face and cope with cognitive impairment. Eight studies observed diagnostic disclosure describing emotional reactions, with professionals using mitigating language and rarely checking patient understanding. Studies reported varying patient involvement, showing marginalization in primary care but not in assessments or diagnostic feedback. Patients used humor and metaphor to compensate for difficulties retrieving information and responding appropriately, suggesting preserved awareness of the pragmatics of interaction. Companion roles fluctuated between patient advocate and professional informant. Professionals encountered challenges adapting to heterogeneous patient groups with varying capabilities and needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-companion-professional communication in dementia care raises various ethical questions: how to strike a balance between different communicative needs of patients and companions; clarity versus sensitivity in delivery of the diagnosis; and whether to minimize or expose interactional difficulties and misunderstanding to enrich patient understanding and involvement. Healthcare professionals need guidance in delivering a diagnosis and strategies to optimize patient and companion participation.

摘要

背景

痴呆会影响沟通,即使在早期阶段也是如此。尚未对直接观察患者、陪伴者和医护人员如何进行沟通的研究进行综述。

方法

检索了八个数据库,并对相关期刊和灰色文献进行了手工检索,截至2014年8月。两位作者独立审查摘要,并共同审查以确定纳入的一致性。对研究结果进行了叙述性综合。

结果

共确定了23项研究,观察了诊断、随访、日间护理中心、初级保健和研究同意过程中的互动情况。14项研究中有陪伴者在场。出现了三个主题:诊断的情感影响、患者参与程度以及参与者为保全面子和应对认知障碍所采用的策略。八项研究观察了诊断信息披露情况,描述了情感反应,专业人员使用缓和性语言,很少检查患者的理解情况。研究报告的患者参与程度各不相同,显示在初级保健中患者被边缘化,但在评估或诊断反馈中并非如此。患者使用幽默和隐喻来弥补获取信息和适当回应方面的困难,这表明他们对互动语用学仍有一定认识。陪伴者的角色在患者代言人与专业信息提供者之间波动。专业人员在适应能力和需求各异的异质患者群体方面遇到了挑战。

结论

痴呆护理中的患者 - 陪伴者 - 专业人员沟通引发了各种伦理问题:如何在患者和陪伴者的不同沟通需求之间取得平衡;诊断传达中的清晰度与敏感性;以及是否尽量减少或暴露互动困难和误解以增进患者理解和参与度。医护人员在进行诊断以及优化患者和陪伴者参与度的策略方面需要指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验