Fioravanti M, Flicker L
Department of Psychiatric Science and Psychological Medicine, University of Rome "La Sapienza", P.le A. Moro, 5, Rome, Italy, 00185.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(4):CD003159. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003159.
Nicergoline is an ergot derivative currently in use in over fifty countries for more than three decades, for the treatment of cognitive, affective, and behavioral disorders of older people. It was initially considered as a vasoactive drug and mainly prescribed for cerebrovascular disorders. Recent findings suggest other actions which has provided a rationale for the use of nicergoline for the treatment of various forms of dementia, including Alzheimer's Disease.
To determine whether there is evidence of efficacy of nicergoline in the treatment of dementia and other age-associated forms of cognitive decline,and to assess the safety and tolerability of the drug.
A comprehensive search of the international literature and the producing company archives has been performed to identify all possible sources of data for this review. Only those trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria of belonging to either category A or B of allocation concealment, as defined by the Cochrane Organisation, were examined for data extraction by one reviewer. If there was doubt then the other reviewer was consulted. Data availability restricted analyses to 'completers' analyses for the outcome measures. Outcomes able to be assessed included: Behaviour, Cognition, Clinical Judgment, Tolerability, EEG.
The Sandoz Clinical Assessment Geriatric Scale (SCAG) was the outcome used in the largest number of patients (814 patients). The results from these studies were homogeneous in nature despite including patients observed for periods of time ranging from 2 months to 12 months. There was a difference in favour of the active treatment in reducing the behavioural symptoms described by this scale, -5.18 points [-8.03, -2.33]. This scale has a maximum of 133 points. The therapeutic effects of nicergoline seem to be evident by 2 months of treatment and maintained for 6 months. In general other behavioural outcome measures which include the GRS, the IADL, and the MACC and were episodically used in few studies, failed to demonstrate statistically significant results although there was a trend favouring treatment. Cognitive assessment has been performed in a moderate number of patients with the MMSE (261 patients) and the ADAS-Cog (342 patients). No significant heterogeneity was found for these trials, despite the trials extending over periods of treatment of 3 to 12 months. There was a difference between treatment and control groups on the MMSE favouring nicergoline treatment. At 12 months the effect size was 2.86 [0.98, 4.74] The effect size for the ADAS-Cog, used exclusively with Alzheimer's disease patients, did not reveal a significant benefit. At 12 months the trend favoured treatment (-1.64 [-4.62, 1.34]). The other results from various cognitive measures tended to favour nicergoline but this was based on a small number of cases. The clinical impression of change obtained from a total of 921 patients was homogeneous across the studies, despite reflecting changes over periods of time ranging from 2 to 12 months. The Peto odd ratio for improvement in the subjects treated with nicergoline over these varying time periods was 3.33 [2.50, 4.43]. Tolerability assessed in 1427 patients was homogeneous across all studies and demonstrated a mildly increased risk of adverse events on treatment, OR 1.51[1.10, 2.07].
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: The clinical studies on nicergoline were carried out with diverse criteria and modalities of evaluation. Despite this, the 14 studies included in this review, have presented generally consistent results. Results of this meta-analysis provide some evidence of positive effects of nicergoline on cognition and behaviour and these effects are supported by an effect on clinical global impression. There was some evidence that there were increased risk of adverse effects associated with nicergoline. These results were obtained on older patients with mild to moderate cognitive and behavioural impairment of various clinical origins, including chronic cerebrovascular disorders and Alzheimer's dementia. The few studies specifically performed on patients with Alzheimer's disease were performed with too few people to give a definitive answer to the questions concerning the use of nicergoline for this form of dementia. This drug has not been evaluated using current diagnostic categories such as MCI or in association with therapeutic agents of different nature such as cholinesterase or antioxidant drugs.
尼麦角林是一种麦角衍生物,三十多年来在五十多个国家用于治疗老年人的认知、情感和行为障碍。它最初被认为是一种血管活性药物,主要用于治疗脑血管疾病。最近的研究发现了其他作用,这为使用尼麦角林治疗包括阿尔茨海默病在内的各种形式的痴呆提供了理论依据。
确定是否有证据表明尼麦角林在治疗痴呆和其他与年龄相关的认知衰退形式方面有效,并评估该药物的安全性和耐受性。
对国际文献和生产公司档案进行了全面检索,以确定本次综述的所有可能数据来源。只有那些符合Cochrane组织定义的A类或B类分配隐藏纳入标准的试验,由一名审阅者进行数据提取检查。如有疑问,则咨询另一位审阅者。数据可用性将分析限制为结局测量的“完成者”分析。能够评估的结局包括:行为、认知、临床判断、耐受性、脑电图。
山德士临床老年评估量表(SCAG)是在最多患者(814例患者)中使用的结局指标。尽管这些研究中的患者观察时间从2个月到12个月不等,但这些研究结果本质上是同质的。在减少该量表所描述的行为症状方面,积极治疗组有差异,为-5.18分[-8.03,-2.33]。该量表最高分为133分。尼麦角林的治疗效果在治疗2个月时似乎很明显,并持续6个月。一般来说,其他行为结局测量指标,包括GRS、IADL和MACC,在少数研究中偶尔使用,尽管有治疗倾向,但未能显示出统计学上的显著结果。对中等数量的患者进行了认知评估,使用MMSE(261例患者)和ADAS-Cog(342例患者)。尽管这些试验的治疗期为3至12个月,但未发现这些试验有显著异质性。在MMSE上,治疗组和对照组之间存在差异,有利于尼麦角林治疗。在12个月时,效应大小为2.86[0.98,4.74]。专门用于阿尔茨海默病患者的ADAS-Cog的效应大小未显示出显著益处。在12个月时,趋势有利于治疗(-1.64[-4.62,1.34])。各种认知测量的其他结果倾向于支持尼麦角林,但这是基于少数病例。从总共921例患者获得的临床变化印象在各项研究中是同质的,尽管反映的是2至12个月期间的变化。在这些不同时间段接受尼麦角林治疗的受试者改善的Peto比值为3.33[2.50,4.43]。在1427例患者中评估的耐受性在所有研究中是同质的,并且显示治疗时不良事件风险略有增加,OR为1.51[1.10,2.07]。
关于尼麦角林的临床研究采用了不同的评估标准和方式。尽管如此,本综述纳入的14项研究总体上呈现出一致的结果。该荟萃分析的结果提供了一些证据,表明尼麦角林对认知和行为有积极作用,并且这些作用得到了对临床总体印象的影响的支持。有一些证据表明,与尼麦角林相关的不良反应风险增加。这些结果是在患有各种临床病因的轻度至中度认知和行为障碍的老年患者中获得的,包括慢性脑血管疾病和阿尔茨海默病痴呆。专门针对阿尔茨海默病患者进行的少数研究纳入的人数太少,无法对使用尼麦角林治疗这种形式的痴呆的问题给出明确答案。该药物尚未根据当前的诊断类别如MCI进行评估,也未与不同性质的治疗药物如胆碱酯酶或抗氧化药物联合评估。