Suppr超能文献

theta爆发刺激与单脉冲和双脉冲经颅磁刺激的安全性和耐受性:165名儿科受试者的比较研究

Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects.

作者信息

Hong Yaejee H, Wu Steve W, Pedapati Ernest V, Horn Paul S, Huddleston David A, Laue Cameron S, Gilbert Donald L

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, OH, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;9:29. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00029. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although single- and paired-pulse (sp/pp) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies are considered minimal risk in adults and children, the safety profile for theta-burst TMS (TBS) is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

In this comparative analysis, we explored the rate, severity, and specific symptoms of TMS-related adverse effects (AEs) between sp/ppTMS and TBS in subjects between ages 6 and 18 years.

METHOD

Data from 165 participants from 2009 to 2014 were analyzed. Assessment of AEs was performed based on baseline and post-TMS administration of a symptom-based questionnaire that rated AEs on a 5-level ordinal scale (minimal, mild, moderate, marked, severe). AE rates and severity were compared using Chi Square or Fisher's Exact Test depending on data characteristics.

RESULT

Overall, no seizures or severe-rated AEs were reported by 165 pediatric participants. The rate of AE in all TBS sessions was 10.5% (n = 76, 95% CI: 4.7-19.7%), whereas the rate of AE in all sp/ppTMS sessions was 12.4% (n = 89, 95% CI: 6.3-21.0%). There was no statistical difference in AE rates between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 0.71). In all sp/ppTMS and TBS sessions, 20 subjects reported a total of 35 AEs, among these 31 (~88.6%) were rated as "minimal" or "mild". There was no difference in the severity of AE between TBS and sp/ppTMS (p = 1.0). Only one of 76 TBS participants reported an AE rated as more than minimal/mild.

CONCLUSION

Our comparative analysis showed that TBS appears to be as safe as sp/ppTMS in terms of AE rate and severity. This report supports further investigation of TBS in children.

摘要

背景

尽管单脉冲和双脉冲(sp/pp)经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究在成人和儿童中被认为风险极小,但theta爆发式TMS(TBS)的安全性尚不明确。

目的

在这项对比分析中,我们探讨了6至18岁受试者中,sp/ppTMS与TBS之间TMS相关不良反应(AE)的发生率、严重程度及具体症状。

方法

分析了2009年至2014年165名参与者的数据。基于症状的问卷在TMS治疗前和治疗后进行AE评估,该问卷将AE按5级序贯量表(极小、轻度、中度、显著、严重)进行评分。根据数据特征,使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验比较AE发生率和严重程度。

结果

总体而言,165名儿科参与者均未报告癫痫发作或严重程度的AE。所有TBS治疗的AE发生率为10.5%(n = 76,95%CI:4.7 - 19.7%),而所有sp/ppTMS治疗的AE发生率为12.4%(n = 89,95%CI:6.3 - 21.0%)。TBS与sp/ppTMS之间的AE发生率无统计学差异(p = 0.71)。在所有sp/ppTMS和TBS治疗中,20名受试者共报告了35例AE,其中31例(约88.6%)被评为“极小”或“轻度”。TBS与sp/ppTMS之间的AE严重程度无差异(p = 1.0)。76名TBS参与者中只有1人报告了1例AE,其严重程度超过极小/轻度。

结论

我们的对比分析表明,在AE发生率和严重程度方面,TBS似乎与sp/ppTMS一样安全。本报告支持对儿童TBS进行进一步研究。

相似文献

2
Safety Considerations for Cerebellar Theta Burst Stimulation.
Clin Ther. 2020 Jul;42(7):1169-1190.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Feasibility and clinical effects of theta burst stimulation in youth with major depressive disorders: An open-label trial.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Nov 1;258:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.084. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
4
Safety and tolerability of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in children.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Jul;54(7):636-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04300.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
5
Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f.
6
A Systematic Review of the Safety and Tolerability of Theta Burst Stimulation in Children and Adolescents.
Neuromodulation. 2022 Jun;25(4):494-503. doi: 10.1111/ner.13455. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
9
Demonstration of short-term plasticity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with theta burst stimulation: A TMS-EEG study.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jul;128(7):1117-1126. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
10
Bilateral prefrontal rTMS and theta burst TMS as an add-on treatment for depression: a randomized placebo controlled trial.
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;16(1):57-65. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2014.964768. Epub 2014 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

2
Role of Accelerated Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Hand Dystonia: From Acute Phase to Maintenance Treatment.
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2025 May 31;23(2):323-326. doi: 10.9758/cpn.24.1207. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
4
Accelerated Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Refractory Depression in Autism Spectrum Disorder.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Mar;55(3):940-954. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06244-2. Epub 2024 May 15.
9

本文引用的文献

1
TMS and drugs revisited 2014.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;126(10):1847-68. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
2
Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.
Brain Stimul. 2015 Jan-Feb;8(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Functional MRI-navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over supplementary motor area in chronic tic disorders.
Brain Stimul. 2014 Mar-Apr;7(2):212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
5
Comparative incidence rates of mild adverse effects to transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Mar;124(3):536-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.024. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
6
Safety and tolerability of theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation in children.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Jul;54(7):636-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04300.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
9
Screening questionnaire before TMS: an update.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Aug;122(8):1686. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.037. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
10
Safety of theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation: a systematic review of the literature.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):67-74. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318205135f.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验