Ulrich A, Min K, Curt A
Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Oct;126(10):1994-2003. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.12.020. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
To evaluate the sensitivity of dermatomal contact-heat evoked potentials (dCHEPs) compared to dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (dSSEPs) and clinical sensory testing in patients with focal central cord myelopathy, referred to as "snake-eye" appearance myelopathy (SEAM).
33 patients with SEAM in neuroimaging underwent electrophysiological (dCHEPs, dSSEPs) and clinical testing of sensory function (light touch [LT] and pin prick [PP]) at segments above, at and below to the spinal cord lesion.
In total, 151 dermatomes were tested (39 above, 112 at/below lesion). The sensitivity of dCHEPs (97.0%) was significantly higher compared to dSSEPs (23.3%, p<0.001), PP (66.7%, p=0.003) and LT (69.7%, p=0.006), respectively. The sensitivity of dCHEPs was highest when applied one to two segments caudally to the level of spinal cord lesion in MRI.
dCHEPs are highly sensitive and superior to dSSEPs and clinical sensory testing in the diagnosis of SEAM.
dCHEPs may complement the diagnosis in focal central cord myelopathies where clinical testing of sensory function and dSSEPs are less sensitive to provide conclusive findings.
评估皮节接触热诱发电位(dCHEPs)与皮节体感诱发电位(dSSEPs)以及临床感觉测试相比,在被称为“蛇眼”样外观脊髓病(SEAM)的局灶性中央脊髓脊髓病患者中的敏感性。
33例神经影像学检查显示为SEAM的患者,在脊髓病变节段上方、病变节段及下方节段接受了电生理检查(dCHEPs、dSSEPs)以及感觉功能的临床测试(轻触觉[LT]和针刺觉[PP])。
总共测试了151个皮节(病变上方39个,病变处及下方112个)。dCHEPs的敏感性(97.0%)分别显著高于dSSEPs(23.3%,p<0.001)、PP(66.7%,p=0.003)和LT(69.7%,p=0.006)。当在MRI脊髓病变水平尾侧一至两个节段应用时,dCHEPs的敏感性最高。
dCHEPs在SEAM诊断中具有高度敏感性,优于dSSEPs和临床感觉测试。
在感觉功能临床测试和dSSEPs敏感性较低难以提供确凿结果的局灶性中央脊髓脊髓病中,dCHEPs可能有助于补充诊断。