Suppr超能文献

杜氏肌营养不良症与健康对照者的电阻抗肌电图:一项关于可靠性和有效性的多中心研究。

Electrical impedance myography in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and healthy controls: A multicenter study of reliability and validity.

作者信息

Zaidman Craig M, Wang Lucy L, Connolly Anne M, Florence Julaine, Wong Brenda L, Parsons Julie A, Apkon Susan, Goyal Namita, Williams Eugene, Escolar Diana, Rutkove Seward B, Bohorquez Jose L

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8111, St. Louis, Missouri, 63110, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2015 Oct;52(4):592-7. doi: 10.1002/mus.24611. Epub 2015 Jul 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a non-invasive, painless, objective technique to quantify muscle pathology.

METHODS

We measured EIM in 8 arm and leg muscles in 61 boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and 31 healthy boys, ages 3-12 years, at 5 centers. We determined the reliability of EIM and compared results in boys with DMD to controls and to 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), timed functional tests (TFTs), and strength (hand-held dynamometry).

RESULTS

EIM was well tolerated and had good inter- and intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81-0.96). The averaged EIM phase value from all muscles was higher (P < 0.001) in controls (10.45 ± 2.29) than boys with DMD (7.31 ± 2.23), and correlated (P ≤ 0.001) with 6MWD (r = 0.55), NSAA (r = 0.66), TFTs (r = -0.56), and strength (r = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

EIM is a reliable and valid measure of disease severity in DMD. Longitudinal studies comparing EIM with other assessments over time in DMD are warranted.

摘要

引言

电阻抗肌描记术(EIM)是一种用于量化肌肉病变的非侵入性、无痛且客观的技术。

方法

我们在5个中心对61名患有杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)的3至12岁男孩和31名健康男孩的8块手臂和腿部肌肉进行了EIM测量。我们确定了EIM的可靠性,并将DMD男孩的结果与对照组以及6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、北极星动态评估(NSAA)、定时功能测试(TFTs)和力量(手持测力计)进行了比较。

结果

EIM耐受性良好,具有良好的评分者间和评分者内可靠性(组内相关系数为0.81 - 0.96)。对照组所有肌肉的平均EIM相位值(10.45±2.29)高于DMD男孩(7.31±2.23)(P < 0.001),并且与6MWD(r = 0.55)、NSAA(r = 0.66)、TFTs(r = -0.56)和力量(r = 0.44)相关(P≤0.001)。

结论

EIM是衡量DMD疾病严重程度的可靠且有效的指标。有必要进行纵向研究,比较DMD患者随时间推移EIM与其他评估方法的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验