Riva Nicoletta, Ageno Walter
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2015 Mar;41(2):178-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1544231. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Anticoagulant treatment can be currently instituted with two different classes of drugs: the vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and the newer, "novel" or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant drugs (NOACs). The NOACs have several practical advantages over VKAs, such as the rapid onset/offset of action, the lower potential for food and drug interactions, and the predictable anticoagulant response. However, the VKAs currently have a broader spectrum of indications, a standardized monitoring test, and established reversal strategies. The NOACs emerged as alternative options for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, there remain some populations for whom the VKAs remain the most appropriate anticoagulant drug. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of VKAs and NOACs.
维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和更新的“新型”或非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药物(NOAC)。与VKA相比,NOAC具有几个实际优势,如起效/失效迅速、食物和药物相互作用的可能性较低以及抗凝反应可预测。然而,VKA目前具有更广泛的适应证范围、标准化的监测试验以及既定的逆转策略。NOAC作为预防和治疗静脉血栓栓塞以及预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者中风和全身性栓塞的替代选择而出现。尽管如此,仍有一些人群VKA仍是最合适的抗凝药物。本文讨论了VKA和NOAC的优缺点。