Suppr超能文献

预测小于胎龄儿:19-24 周胎儿生物测量筛查。

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks.

机构信息

Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;46(2):198-207. doi: 10.1002/uog.14826. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the value of fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks' gestation in the prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, in the absence of pre-eclampsia (PE), and examine the potential value of such assessment in deciding whether the third-trimester scan should be at 32 and/or 36 weeks' gestation.

METHODS

This was a screening study in 88,187 singleton pregnancies, including 5003 (5.7%) that delivered SGA neonates with birth weight < 5(th) percentile (SGA < 5(th)). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if screening by a combination of maternal characteristics and medical history and Z-scores of fetal head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) had significant contribution in predicting SGA neonates. A model was developed for selecting the gestational age for third-trimester assessment, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, based on the results of screening at 19-24 weeks.

RESULTS

Combined screening by maternal factors and fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks, predicted 76%, 58% and 44% of SGA < 5(th) delivering < 32, 32-36 and ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, respectively, at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%. The detection rate (DR) of SGA < 5(th) delivering at 32-36 weeks improved from 58% to 82% with screening at 32 weeks rather than at 19-24 weeks. Similarly, the DR of SGA < 5(th) delivering ≥ 37 weeks improved from 44% with screening at 19-24 weeks to 61% and 76% with screening at 32 and 36 weeks, respectively. In a hypothetical model, it was estimated that if the desired objective of prenatal screening is to predict about 80% of the cases of SGA < 5(th), it would be necessary to select 28% of the population at the 19-24-week assessment to be reassessed at 32 weeks and 41% to be reassessed at 36 weeks; in 59% of pregnancies there would be no need for a third-trimester scan.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal prediction of a high proportion of SGA neonates necessitates the undertaking of screening in the third trimester of pregnancy, in addition to assessment in the second trimester, and the timing of such screening, either at 32 and/or 36 weeks, should be contingent on the results of the assessment at 19-24 weeks.

摘要

目的

探讨 19-24 孕周胎儿生物测量在预测无子痫前期(PE)的小于胎龄儿(SGA)新生儿中的价值,并研究这种评估在决定是否应在 32 周和/或 36 周进行第三次妊娠扫描中的潜在价值。

方法

这是一项在 88187 例单胎妊娠中的筛查研究,其中 5003 例(5.7%)分娩出生体重<第 5 百分位(SGA <第 5 百分位)的 SGA 新生儿。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定是否通过母体特征和病史的组合以及胎儿头围(HC)、腹围(AC)和股骨长(FL)的 Z 分数的联合筛查,对预测 SGA 新生儿有显著贡献。根据 19-24 周的筛查结果,为选择 32 周和/或 36 周的第三次妊娠评估的孕龄制定了一个模型。

结果

在 19-24 周时通过母体因素和胎儿生物测量联合筛查,分别预测了 76%、58%和 44%的 SGA <第 5 百分位的新生儿,分别在<32 周、32-36 周和≥37 周时分娩,假阳性率(FPR)为 10%。与在 19-24 周进行筛查相比,在 32 周时进行筛查可将 SGA <第 5 百分位的新生儿在 32-36 周时的检出率(DR)从 58%提高到 82%。同样,在 19-24 周进行筛查时,SGA <第 5 百分位的新生儿在≥37 周时的 DR 从 44%提高到 61%和 76%,分别在 32 周和 36 周进行筛查时。在一个假设模型中,如果产前筛查的目标是预测约 80%的 SGA <第 5 百分位的病例,那么需要在 19-24 周的评估中选择 28%的人群在 32 周时重新评估,41%的人群在 36 周时重新评估;在 59%的妊娠中,不需要进行第三次妊娠扫描。

结论

要预测很大比例的 SGA 新生儿,需要在妊娠晚期进行筛查,除了在妊娠中期进行评估外,还需要根据在 19-24 周时的评估结果,选择在 32 周和/或 36 周时进行筛查,而这种筛查的时间应取决于在 19-24 周时的评估结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验