Poon L C, Lesmes C, Gallo D M, Akolekar R, Nicolaides K H
Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Fetal Medicine Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, Kent, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):437-45. doi: 10.1002/uog.14904. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
To investigate the value of combined screening by maternal characteristics and medical history, fetal biometry and biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks' gestation, for prediction of delivery of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonates, in the absence of pre-eclampsia (PE), and examine the potential value of such assessment in deciding whether the third-trimester scan should be at 32 and/or 36 weeks' gestation.
This was a screening study in 7816 singleton pregnancies, including 389 (5.0%) that delivered SGA neonates with birth weight < 5(th) percentile (SGA < 5(th) ), in the absence of PE. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if screening by a combination of maternal factors, fetal biometry, uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum concentrations of placental growth factor (PlGF) and α-fetoprotein (AFP) had significant contribution in predicting SGA neonates. A model was developed for selecting the gestational age for third-trimester assessment, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, based on the results of screening at 19-24 weeks.
Significant independent contributions to the prediction of SGA < 5(th) were provided by maternal factors, fetal biometry, UtA-PI and serum PlGF and AFP. The detection rate (DR) of such combined screening at 19-24 weeks was 100%, 78% and 42% for SGA < 5(th) delivering < 32, at 32-36 and ≥ 37 weeks' gestation, respectively, at a false-positive rate (FPR) of 10%. In a hypothetical model, it was estimated that if the desired objective of prenatal screening is to predict about 80% of the cases of SGA < 5(th) , it would be necessary to select 11% of the population at the 19-24-week assessment to be reassessed at 32 weeks and 44% to be reassessed at 36 weeks; 57% would not require a third-trimester scan.
Prenatal prediction of a high proportion of SGA neonates necessitates the undertaking of screening in the third trimester of pregnancy, in addition to assessment in the second trimester, and the timing of such screening, at 32 and/or 36 weeks, should be contingent on the results of the assessment at 19-24 weeks.
探讨在无先兆子痫(PE)的情况下,结合孕妇特征与病史、胎儿生物测量以及孕19 - 24周时的生物物理和生化标志物进行联合筛查,对预测小于胎龄(SGA)新生儿分娩的价值,并研究这种评估在决定孕晚期超声检查应安排在孕32周和/或36周时的潜在价值。
这是一项对7816例单胎妊娠的筛查研究,其中389例(5.0%)在无PE的情况下分娩出出生体重低于第5百分位数的SGA新生儿(SGA < 第5百分位数)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定通过孕妇因素、胎儿生物测量、子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA - PI)以及孕妇血清胎盘生长因子(PlGF)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)浓度的联合筛查,在预测SGA新生儿方面是否有显著贡献。基于孕19 - 24周的筛查结果,建立了一个模型用于选择孕晚期评估(32周和/或36周)的孕周。
孕妇因素、胎儿生物测量、UtA - PI以及血清PlGF和AFP对预测SGA < 第5百分位数有显著的独立贡献。孕19 - 24周这种联合筛查对孕周小于32周、32 - 36周以及≥37周分娩的SGA < 第5百分位数新生儿的检出率(DR)分别为100%、78%和42%,假阳性率(FPR)为10%。在一个假设模型中,估计如果产前筛查的期望目标是预测约80%的SGA < 第5百分位数病例,那么在孕19 - 24周评估时,有必要选择11%的人群在32周进行重新评估,44%的人群在36周进行重新评估;57%的人群不需要孕晚期超声检查。
要对高比例的SGA新生儿进行产前预测,除了在孕中期进行评估外,还需要在孕晚期进行筛查,且这种筛查安排在32周和/或36周的时机应取决于孕19 - 24周评估的结果。