KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Department Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Leuven, Belgium; Centro de Malária e outras Doenças Tropicais, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical e Unidade de Microbiologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jun;21(6):607.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Rilpivirine is a second-generation nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) currently indicated for first-line therapy, but its clinical benefit for HIV-1 infected patients failing first-generation NNRTIs is largely undefined. This study quantified the extent of genotypic rilpivirine resistance in viral isolates from 1212 patients upon failure of efavirenz- or nevirapine-containing antiretroviral treatment, of whom more than respectively 80% and 90% showed high-level genotypic resistance to the failing NNRTI. Of all study patients, 47% showed a rilpivirine resistance-associated mutation (RPV-RAM), whereas preserved residual rilpivirine activity was predicted in half of the patients by three genotypic drug resistance interpretation algorithms. An NNRTI-dependent impact on rilpivirine resistance was detected. Compared with the use of nevirapine, the use of efavirenz was associated with a 32% lower risk of having a RPV-RAM and a 50% lower risk of predicted reduced rilpivirine susceptibility. Most prevalent RPV-RAMs after nevirapine experience were Y181C and H221Y, whereas L100I+K103N, Y188L and K101E occurred most in efavirenz-experienced patients. Predicted rilpivirine activity was not affected by HIV-1 subtype, although frequency of individual mutations differed across subtypes. In conclusion, this genotypic resistance analysis strongly suggests that the latest NNRTI, rilpivirine, may retain activity in a large proportion of HIV-1 patients in whom resistance failed while they were on an efavirenz- or nevirapine-containing regimen, and may present an attractive option for second-line treatment given its good safety profile and dosing convenience. However, prospective clinical studies assessing the effectiveness of rilpivirine for NNRTI-experienced patients are warranted to validate knowledge derived from genotypic and phenotypic drug resistance studies.
利匹韦林是一种第二代非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI),目前被推荐用于一线治疗,但它在治疗第一代 NNRTI 失败的 HIV-1 感染患者方面的临床益处尚未得到充分明确。本研究量化了在依非韦伦或奈韦拉平含抗病毒治疗失败的 1212 例患者的病毒分离株中基因型利匹韦林耐药的程度,其中分别超过 80%和 90%的患者对失败的 NNRTI 表现出高水平的基因型耐药。在所有研究患者中,47%的患者出现了利匹韦林耐药相关突变(RPV-RAM),但三种基因型耐药解读算法预测有一半的患者保留了残余的利匹韦林活性。检测到 NNRTI 对利匹韦林耐药的依赖性。与使用奈韦拉平相比,使用依非韦伦与出现 RPV-RAM 的风险降低 32%和预测的利匹韦林敏感性降低 50%相关。在经历过奈韦拉平的患者中,最常见的 RPV-RAMs 是 Y181C 和 H221Y,而在经历过依非韦伦的患者中,最常见的是 L100I+K103N、Y188L 和 K101E。预测的利匹韦林活性不受 HIV-1 亚型的影响,尽管各亚型的突变频率不同。总之,本基因型耐药分析强烈表明,最新的 NNRTI 利匹韦林可能在很大一部分正在接受依非韦伦或奈韦拉平方案治疗但耐药失败的 HIV-1 患者中保留活性,并且鉴于其良好的安全性和方便的给药方式,它可能成为二线治疗的一个有吸引力的选择。然而,需要进行前瞻性临床研究来评估利匹韦林在 NNRTI 经验患者中的有效性,以验证从基因型和表型耐药研究中获得的知识。