• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旧神话,新神话:挑战公共卫生领域的神话

Old myths, new myths: challenging myths in public health.

作者信息

Viehbeck Sarah M, Petticrew Mark, Cummins Steven

机构信息

Sarah M. Viehbeck holds an adjunct appointment with the School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Mark Petticrew and Steven Cummins are with the Department of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):665-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302433. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302433
PMID:25713962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4358183/
Abstract

Myths are widely held beliefs and are frequently perpetuated through telling and retelling. We examined 10 myths in public health research and practice. Where possible, we traced their origins, interrogated their current framing in relation to the evidence, and offered possible alternative ways of thinking about them. These myths focus on the nature of public health and public health interventions, and the nature of evidence in public health. Although myths may have some value, they should not be privileged in an evidence-informed public health context.

摘要

谬见是被广泛持有的观念,常常通过不断讲述而持续存在。我们审视了公共卫生研究与实践中的10个谬见。在可能的情况下,我们追溯了它们的起源,审视了它们当前与证据相关的框架,并提出了思考这些谬见的可能替代方式。这些谬见聚焦于公共卫生及公共卫生干预措施的本质,以及公共卫生中证据的本质。尽管谬见可能有一定价值,但在基于证据的公共卫生背景下,它们不应享有特权。

相似文献

1
Old myths, new myths: challenging myths in public health.旧神话,新神话:挑战公共卫生领域的神话
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):665-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302433. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
2
The Prevention Research Centers program: translating research into public health practice and impact.预防研究中心项目:将研究转化为公共卫生实践及影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Sep;43(3 Suppl 2):S91-2. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.002.
3
Research linkages between academia and public health practice. Building a prevention research agenda.学术界与公共卫生实践之间的研究联系。制定预防研究议程。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3 Suppl):7-9.
4
Using case research to enhance linkages between academia and public health practice.运用案例研究加强学术界与公共卫生实践之间的联系。
Am J Prev Med. 1999 Apr;16(3 Suppl):12-3.
5
Challenging the myths surrounding qualitative research in nursing.挑战护理领域中关于定性研究的种种误区。
Nurs Sci Q. 1996 Spring;9(1):33-7. doi: 10.1177/089431849600900109.
6
Epilepsy myths: alive and foaming in the 21st century.癫痫迷思:在21世纪依然存在且甚嚣尘上。
Epilepsy Behav. 2007 Sep;11(2):192-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
7
Sleep myths: an expert-led study to identify false beliefs about sleep that impinge upon population sleep health practices.睡眠误区:一项由专家主导的研究,旨在识别那些影响人群睡眠健康行为的错误睡眠观念。
Sleep Health. 2019 Aug;5(4):409-417. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
8
'All the stars were aligned'? The origins of England's National Institute for Health Research.“天时地利人和”?英国国家卫生研究院的起源。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Dec 4;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0491-5.
9
Disaster myths after the Great East Japan Disaster and the effects of information sources on belief in such myths.日本东部大地震后的灾难谣言及信息来源对谣言信仰的影响。
Disasters. 2014 Jul;38 Suppl 2:S190-205. doi: 10.1111/disa.12073.
10
Dissemination research in cancer control: where are we and where should we go?癌症控制中的传播研究:我们现状如何,又该何去何从?
Cancer Causes Control. 2009 May;20(4):473-85. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9308-0. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond the Myths: Brazilian Consumer Perceptions of Functional Food.超越神话:巴西消费者对功能性食品的认知
Foods. 2024 Dec 22;13(24):4161. doi: 10.3390/foods13244161.
2
COVID Perceptions among Pregnant Women Living in a Malaria Hyperendemic Rural Region in Uganda: A Cross-Sectional Study.乌干达疟疾高度流行农村地区孕妇对 COVID-19 的认知:一项横断面研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Nov 6;109(6):1363-1367. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0464. Print 2023 Dec 6.
3
Knowledge and perceptions about Dolutegravir and Dolutegravir counselling: a qualitative study among women living with HIV.关于多替拉韦和多替拉韦咨询的知识和认知:一项针对 HIV 感染者女性的定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Sep 9;23(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02630-7.
4
World Health Organization myth busters and indigenous perceptions of COVID-19: Quechua and Shipibo communities.世界卫生组织破除谣言与原住民对新冠病毒的认知:克丘亚族和希皮博族社区
Ampersand (Oxford). 2023;10:100118. doi: 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100118. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Myths in psychology: psychological misconceptions among Spanish psychology students.心理学中的误区:西班牙心理学学生的心理误区。
PeerJ. 2022 Aug 11;10:e13811. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13811. eCollection 2022.
6
Revisiting concepts of evidence in implementation science.重新审视实施科学中的证据概念。
Implement Sci. 2022 Apr 12;17(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01201-y.
7
Community Water Fluoridation: Caveats to Implement Justice in Public Oral Health.社区饮水氟化:公共口腔健康实施正义的警示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2372. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052372.
8
Hospital-Based Suicides: Challenging Existing Myths.基于医院的自杀:挑战现有谬论。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Mar;93(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09856-w. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of a Weight Loss Intervention: An Adaptation of the Look AHEAD Lifestyle Intervention in the US Military.减肥干预的成本效益:美国军方对 LOOK AHEAD 生活方式干预的改编。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Jan;28(1):89-96. doi: 10.1002/oby.22681. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
10
Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action: turning the evidence-based medicine paradigm on its head.利用自然实验研究指导公共卫生行动:颠覆循证医学范式。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Feb;74(2):203-208. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213085. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-level interventions to reduce alcohol-related harm: an overview of systematic reviews.人群层面干预措施减少酒精相关伤害:系统综述概述。
Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):278-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.019. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
2
Twelve myths about systematic reviews for health system policymaking rebutted.驳斥了关于卫生系统决策制定的系统评价的 12 个误区。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013 Jan;18(1):44-50. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2012.011175.
3
Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity.肥胖的误区、假设和事实。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;368(5):446-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1208051.
4
Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.现实主义随机对照试验:一种评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的新方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
5
National Institutes of Health approaches to dissemination and implementation science: current and future directions.美国国立卫生研究院传播与实施科学方法:当前和未来方向。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300755. Epub 2012 May 17.
6
Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance.利用自然实验评估人群健康干预措施:英国医学研究理事会新指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200375. Epub 2012 May 10.
7
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development.卫生系统循证政策指南:制定指南的理由和挑战。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
8
The cost-effectiveness of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施的成本效益。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Mar;34(1):37-45. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr075. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
9
Assessing the evaluability of complex public health interventions: five questions for researchers, funders, and policymakers.评估复杂公共卫生干预措施的可评估性:研究人员、资助者和政策制定者的五个问题。
Milbank Q. 2011 Jun;89(2):206-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00626.x.
10
Public health evaluation: which designs work, for whom and under what circumstances?公共卫生评估:哪些设计有效,对谁有效以及在何种情况下有效?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jul;65(7):596-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.093211.