• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对接受过两次以上肾脏移植的患者相关结局驱动因素的风险调整分析。

Risk-adjusted analysis of relevant outcome drivers for patients after more than two kidney transplants.

作者信息

Kousoulas Lampros, Vondran Florian W R, Syryca Paulina, Klempnauer Juergen, Schrem Harald, Lehner Frank

机构信息

General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hanover Medical School, 30625 Hanover, Germany.

出版信息

J Transplant. 2015;2015:712049. doi: 10.1155/2015/712049. Epub 2015 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1155/2015/712049
PMID:25722883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4333330/
Abstract

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients suffering end-stage renal disease, but as the long-term renal allograft survival is limited, most transplant recipients will face graft loss and will be considered for a retransplantation. The goal of this study was to evaluate the patient and graft survival of the 61 renal transplant recipients after second or subsequent renal transplantation, transplanted in our institution between 1990 and 2010, and to identify risk factors related to inferior outcomes. Actuarial patient survival was 98.3%, 94.8%, and 88.2% after one, three, and five years, respectively. Actuarial graft survival was 86.8%, 80%, and 78.1% after one, three, and five years, respectively. Risk-adjusted analysis revealed that only age at the time of last transplantation had a significant influence on patient survival, whereas graft survival was influenced by multiple immunological and surgical factors, such as the number of HLA mismatches, the type of immunosuppression, the number of surgical complications, need of reoperation, primary graft nonfunction, and acute rejection episodes. In conclusion, third and subsequent renal transplantation constitute a valid therapeutic option, but inferior outcomes should be expected among elderly patients, hyperimmunized recipients, and recipients with multiple operations at the site of last renal transplantation.

摘要

肾移植是终末期肾病患者的首选治疗方法,但由于肾移植长期存活受限,大多数移植受者将面临移植肾失功,并需要考虑再次移植。本研究的目的是评估1990年至2010年间在本机构接受第二次或后续肾移植的61例肾移植受者的患者和移植肾存活率,并确定与不良结局相关的危险因素。术后1年、3年和5年的患者精算生存率分别为98.3%、94.8%和88.2%。术后1年、3年和5年的移植肾精算生存率分别为86.8%、80%和78.1%。风险调整分析显示,仅末次移植时的年龄对患者生存率有显著影响,而移植肾存活率受多种免疫和手术因素影响,如HLA错配数、免疫抑制类型、手术并发症数、再次手术需求、原发性移植肾无功能和急性排斥反应发作次数。总之,第三次及后续肾移植是一种有效的治疗选择,但老年患者、高敏受者以及末次肾移植部位接受多次手术的受者可能预后较差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/6cfaf0b83c35/JTRANS2015-712049.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/f707abb3b0df/JTRANS2015-712049.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/92eeb9bd355f/JTRANS2015-712049.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/6cfaf0b83c35/JTRANS2015-712049.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/f707abb3b0df/JTRANS2015-712049.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/92eeb9bd355f/JTRANS2015-712049.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e262/4333330/6cfaf0b83c35/JTRANS2015-712049.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-adjusted analysis of relevant outcome drivers for patients after more than two kidney transplants.对接受过两次以上肾脏移植的患者相关结局驱动因素的风险调整分析。
J Transplant. 2015;2015:712049. doi: 10.1155/2015/712049. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
2
The UNOS Scientific Renal Transplant Registry--ten years of kidney transplants.美国器官共享联合网络科学肾脏移植登记处——十年肾脏移植情况
Clin Transpl. 1997:1-14.
3
Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing.无急性肾小管坏死的成人尺寸肾脏为婴幼儿提供了极其优异的长期移植效果:单中心及器官共享联合网络(UNOS)分析。器官共享联合网络
Transplantation. 2000 Dec 27;70(12):1728-36. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200012270-00012.
4
The UNOS renal transplant registry.美国器官共享联合网络肾脏移植登记处。
Clin Transpl. 2001:1-18.
5
Long-term results of ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation: a single-center experience.ABO血型不相容活体肾移植的长期结果:单中心经验
Transplantation. 1998 Jan 27;65(2):224-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199801270-00014.
6
Kidney transplantation, the Halifax experience.肾移植:哈利法克斯的经验
Clin Transpl. 1996:231-40.
7
Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Improves Graft and Recipient Survival in Patients with Multiple Kidney Transplants.活体供肾移植可改善多次肾移植患者的移植物和受者生存率。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 5;9(7):2118. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072118.
8
Third and fourth kidney transplant: still a reasonable option.第三次及第四次肾移植:仍是一个合理的选择。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Sep;42(7):2498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.064.
9
A single-center study of the technical aspects and outcome of third and subsequent renal transplants.一项关于第三次及后续肾移植技术方面和结果的单中心研究。
Transplantation. 2003 May 27;75(10):1687-91. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000062536.34333.BB.
10
Pediatric renal transplants--results with sequential immunosuppression.小儿肾移植——序贯免疫抑制治疗的结果
Transplantation. 1992 Jan;53(1):46-51. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199201000-00008.

引用本文的文献

1
Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients.老年人肾移植:回顾性队列研究,以检验2019年新的肾脏分配方案对老年移植受者的影响。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Jul;107(6):403-410. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Protein biomarkers in assessing kidney quality before transplantation‑current status and future perspectives (Review).评估移植前肾脏质量的蛋白质生物标志物:现状与未来展望(综述)。
Int J Mol Med. 2024 Dec;54(6). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2024.5431. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
3
Analysis of Risk Factors for Kidney Retransplant Outcomes Associated with Common Induction Regimens: A Study of over Twelve-Thousand Cases in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
[Health related quality of life and kidney transplantation: a comparison with population values at 6 months post-transplant].[健康相关生活质量与肾移植:与移植后6个月的人群值比较]
Med Clin (Barc). 2014 May 6;142(9):393-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2013.09.044. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
2
[Risk factors for cardiovascular system damage in chronic kidney disease].[慢性肾脏病中心血管系统损伤的危险因素]
Ter Arkh. 2013;85(9):69-76.
3
[Survival and mortality in ESRD patients].[终末期肾病患者的生存与死亡率]
与常见诱导方案相关的肾再次移植结局的危险因素分析:一项对美国一万两千多例病例的研究
J Transplant. 2017;2017:8132672. doi: 10.1155/2017/8132672. Epub 2017 Sep 24.
4
Patterns of Early Rejection in Renal Retransplantation: A Single-Center Experience.肾移植后早期排斥反应的模式:单中心经验。
J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:2697860. doi: 10.1155/2016/2697860. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
5
Kidney retransplantation in children following rejection and recurrent disease.儿童肾移植排斥反应和复发性疾病后的再次移植
Pediatr Nephrol. 2016 Dec;31(12):2235-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00467-016-3346-0. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S127-37. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(13)70042-7.
4
High-urgency renal transplantation: indications and long-term outcomes.高紧迫性肾移植:适应症及长期预后
J Transplant. 2013;2013:314239. doi: 10.1155/2013/314239. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Management of cardiovascular disease in patients with kidney disease.肾脏病患者的心血管疾病管理。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013 May;10(5):261-73. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.15. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
6
The third and fourth renal transplant; technically challenging, but still a valid option.第三次和第四次肾移植;技术上具有挑战性,但仍然是一个有效的选择。
Ann Transplant. 2012 Dec 31;17(4):125-32. doi: 10.12659/aot.883703.
7
Single-center experience with third and fourth kidney transplants.单中心三肾和四肾移植的经验。
Transpl Int. 2011 Aug;24(8):780-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01269.x. Epub 2011 May 16.
8
Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal.美国的长期肾脏移植物存活率:批判性再评估。
Am J Transplant. 2011 Mar;11(3):450-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03283.x. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
9
Third and fourth kidney transplant: still a reasonable option.第三次及第四次肾移植:仍是一个合理的选择。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Sep;42(7):2498-502. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.064.
10
Third kidney transplantation: a permanent medical-surgical challenge.第三次肾脏移植:一项持久的医学-外科挑战。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jul-Aug;41(6):2366-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.105.