Osterman Mark T, Haynes Kevin, Delzell Elizabeth, Zhang Jie, Bewtra Meenakshi, Brensinger Colleen M, Chen Lang, Xie Fenglong, Curtis Jeffrey R, Lewis James D
Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Pharmacoepidemiology Research and Teaching, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul;13(7):1293-1301.e5; quiz e70, e72. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.017. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The benefit of continuing immunomodulators when "stepping up" to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) is uncertain. This study assessed the effectiveness and safety of immunomodulators with anti-TNF therapy in CD.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of new users of anti-TNF therapy for CD in Medicare. Users of anti-TNF combination therapy with immunomodulators were matched to up to 3 users of anti-TNF monotherapy via propensity score and compared by using 3 metrics of effectiveness-surgery, hospitalization, and discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or surgery-and 2 metrics of safety-serious infection and non-Candida opportunistic infection. Cox regression was used for all analyses.
Among new users of infliximab, we matched 381 users of combination therapy to 912 users of monotherapy; among new users of adalimumab, we matched 196 users of combination therapy to 505 users of monotherapy. Combination therapy occurred predominantly as "step up" after thiopurine therapy. The rates of surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.96), hospitalization (HR, 0.82; 0.57-1.19), discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy or surgery (HR, 1.09; 0.88-1.34), and serious infection (HR, 0.93; 0.88-1.34) did not differ between users of anti-TNF combination therapy and monotherapy. However, the risks of opportunistic infection (HR, 2.64; 1.21-5.73) and herpes zoster (HR, 3.16; 1.25-7.97) were increased with combination therapy.
We found that continuation of immunomodulators after "stepping up" to anti-TNF therapy did not improve outcomes but was associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infection.
对于克罗恩病(CD)患者,在“升级”至抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)治疗时继续使用免疫调节剂的益处尚不确定。本研究评估了免疫调节剂联合抗TNF治疗CD的有效性和安全性。
我们对医疗保险中CD抗TNF治疗的新使用者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。将抗TNF联合免疫调节剂治疗的使用者通过倾向得分与多达3名抗TNF单药治疗的使用者进行匹配,并使用有效性的3项指标(手术、住院以及抗TNF治疗或手术的中断)和安全性的2项指标(严重感染和非念珠菌机会性感染)进行比较。所有分析均采用Cox回归。
在英夫利昔单抗的新使用者中,我们将381名联合治疗使用者与912名单药治疗使用者进行了匹配;在阿达木单抗的新使用者中,我们将196名联合治疗使用者与505名单药治疗使用者进行了匹配。联合治疗主要发生在硫嘌呤治疗后的“升级”过程中。抗TNF联合治疗使用者与单药治疗使用者在手术率(风险比[HR],1.20;95%置信区间,0.73 - 1.96)、住院率(HR,0.82;0.57 - 1.19)、抗TNF治疗或手术的中断率(HR,1.09;0.88 - 1.34)以及严重感染率(HR,0.93;0.88 - 1.34)方面没有差异。然而,联合治疗会增加机会性感染(HR,2.64;1.21 - 5.73)和带状疱疹(HR,3.16;1.25 - 7.97)的风险。
我们发现,在“升级”至抗TNF治疗后继续使用免疫调节剂并不能改善治疗效果,反而会增加机会性感染的风险。