Malledant Y, Tanguy M, Saint-Marc C
Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes.
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1989;8(4):334-46. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(89)80075-9.
Lesions of the gastroduodenal mucosa are seen very early on in virtually 100% of patients suffering from organ failure. Bleeding, even if it is only occult, defines acute stress-induced gastrointestinal tract bleeding (SGIB). The rates of SGIB vary according to the inclusion criteria: 13 to 100% microscopic SGIB, 2.3 to 9.5% haemorrhage with blood transfusion and/or shock. Gastrointestinal bleeding does not really influence the death rate of patients with SGIB (0 to 5% increase). Damage to the gastric mucosa may be due to an intraluminal aggression, and/or decreased mucosal and mural defence mechanisms. H+ ions and bile salts are mostly responsible for the former. Physiological quantities of H+ ions may be sufficient, as their abnormal diffusion into the gastric mucosa will reduce the mucosal pH (pHm), which is itself sensitive to microcirculatory modifications and systemic acidosis. There is a good correlation between bleeding and pHm. Bile salts are involved because of the usual increase in frequency and volume of gastric biliary reflux due to stress. Surfactant, mucosal alkaline layer and the microcirculation are all involved in gastric protection. The PGE2 synthetized by the gastric mucosa have a favourable influence on these 3 mechanisms. Changes in microcirculation and hypoxia are the predominant factors involved in stress-induced mucosal damage. The prevention of SGIB relies on the treatment of risk factors, a reduction of intraluminal aggression, and the support and/or stimulation of gastric defence mechanisms. Antacids and anti-H2 drugs aim to neutralize most of the H+ ions, being more efficient than placebo in increasing gastric pH greater than 4, although anti-H2 agents are responsible of a greater number of failures. The non-homogenous character of the patient groups studied and the diagnostic methods, as well as the increasing lack of placebo groups in the published studies make the interpretation of the results rather risky. Antacids and anti-H2 drugs are more efficient than placebo, and equally efficient, in preventing overt SGIB. Efficiency is increased by giving anti-H2 drugs continuously, and antacids hourly. Other agents are thought to protect mucosal cells, probably increasing mucosal defences. Amongst them are the prostaglandins, the most interesting of which are still being investigated, and sucralfate. The latter molecule is as efficient as antacids and anti-H2 drugs, and does not alter gastric pH, so reducing the number of nosocomial pneumonias. Its reduced cost and easy administration make it, at the present time, the treatment of choice of SGIB. The few rare contraindications of sucralfate will justify the infusion of anti-H2 drugs in those patients at risk.
在几乎100%的器官衰竭患者中,胃十二指肠黏膜病变在疾病早期即可出现。出血,即使只是隐匿性出血,也可定义为急性应激性胃肠道出血(SGIB)。SGIB的发生率因纳入标准而异:微观SGIB发生率为13%至100%,需输血和/或出现休克的出血发生率为2.3%至9.5%。胃肠道出血对SGIB患者的死亡率并无实质性影响(死亡率增加0%至5%)。胃黏膜损伤可能是由于管腔内侵袭,和/或黏膜及壁层防御机制减弱。H⁺离子和胆汁盐主要是前者的成因。生理量的H⁺离子可能就已足够,因为其异常扩散至胃黏膜会降低黏膜pH值(pHm),而pHm本身对微循环改变和全身酸中毒敏感。出血与pHm之间存在良好的相关性。胆汁盐参与其中是因为应激导致胃胆汁反流的频率和量通常会增加。表面活性剂、黏膜碱性层和微循环均参与胃的保护。胃黏膜合成的前列腺素E2(PGE2)对这三种机制均有有利影响。微循环变化和缺氧是应激性黏膜损伤的主要相关因素。SGIB的预防依赖于危险因素的治疗、管腔内侵袭的减少以及胃防御机制的支持和/或刺激。抗酸剂和H2受体拮抗剂旨在中和大部分H⁺离子,在将胃pH值提高至大于4方面比安慰剂更有效,尽管H2受体拮抗剂导致更多治疗失败情况。所研究患者群体和诊断方法的非均一性,以及已发表研究中安慰剂组越来越少,使得结果的解读颇具风险。抗酸剂和H2受体拮抗剂在预防显性SGIB方面比安慰剂更有效,且效果相当。持续给予H2受体拮抗剂和每小时给予抗酸剂可提高疗效。其他药物被认为可保护黏膜细胞,可能会增强黏膜防御。其中包括前列腺素,目前仍在对其中最具研究价值的进行研究,还有硫糖铝。后者与抗酸剂和H2受体拮抗剂效果相当,且不会改变胃pH值,因此可减少医院获得性肺炎的发生。其成本较低且易于给药,使其目前成为SGIB的首选治疗方法。硫糖铝极少的罕见禁忌证将证明对有风险的患者输注H2受体拮抗剂是合理的。