• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与使用抗酸剂或组胺2型阻滞剂相比,接受硫糖铝治疗的插管患者发生医院获得性肺炎的情况。胃定植的作用。

Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. The role of gastric colonization.

作者信息

Driks M R, Craven D E, Celli B R, Manning M, Burke R A, Garvin G M, Kunches L M, Farber H W, Wedel S A, McCabe W R

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, MA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 26;317(22):1376-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711263172204.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM198711263172204
PMID:2891032
Abstract

Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia may result from retrograde colonization of the pharynx from the stomach, and this may be more likely when the gastric pH is relatively high. We studied the rate of nosocomial pneumonia among 130 patients given mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit who were receiving as prophylaxis for stress ulcer either sucralfate (n = 61), which does not raise gastric pH, or conventional treatment with antacids, histamine type 2 (H2) blockers, or both (n = 69). At the time of randomization to treatment, the two groups were similar in age, underlying diseases, and severity of acute illness. Patients in the sucralfate group had a higher proportion of gastric aspirates with a pH less than or equal to 4 (P less than 0.001) and significantly lower concentrations of gram-negative bacilli (P less than 0.05) in gastric aspirates, pharyngeal swabs, and tracheal aspirates than did patients in the antacid-H2-blocker group. The rate of pneumonia was twice as high in the antacid-H2 group as in the sucralfate group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 4.58; P = 0.11). Gram-negative bacilli were isolated more frequently from the tracheal aspirates of patients with pneumonia who were receiving antacids or H2 blockers. Mortality rates were 1.6 times higher in the antacid-H2 group than in the sucralfate group (95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 2.50; P = 0.07). Although our results fell just short of statistical significance when they were analyzed according to intention to treat, they suggest that agents that elevate gastric pH increase the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients receiving ventilation by favoring gastric colonization with gram-negative bacilli. We conclude that in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, the use of a prophylactic agent against stress-ulcer bleeding that preserves the natural gastric acid barrier against bacterial overgrowth may be preferable to antacids and H2 blockers.

摘要

革兰阴性菌医院获得性肺炎可能源于胃内容物逆行定植于咽部,当胃内pH值相对较高时,发生这种情况的可能性可能更大。我们研究了130例在重症监护病房接受机械通气的患者的医院获得性肺炎发生率,这些患者作为应激性溃疡的预防措施,分别接受硫糖铝(n = 61),其不会升高胃内pH值,或接受抗酸剂、组胺2型(H2)受体阻滞剂或两者联合的传统治疗(n = 69)。在随机分组接受治疗时,两组患者在年龄、基础疾病和急性疾病严重程度方面相似。硫糖铝组患者胃吸出物pH值小于或等于4的比例更高(P < 0.001),且胃吸出物、咽拭子和气管吸出物中革兰阴性杆菌的浓度显著低于抗酸剂 - H2受体阻滞剂组患者(P < 0.05)。抗酸剂 - H2受体阻滞剂组的肺炎发生率是硫糖铝组的两倍(95%置信区间,0.89至4.58;P = 0.11)。在接受抗酸剂或H2受体阻滞剂治疗的肺炎患者的气管吸出物中,革兰阴性杆菌的分离频率更高。抗酸剂 - H2受体阻滞剂组的死亡率比硫糖铝组高1.6倍(95%置信区间,0.99至2.50;P = 0.07)。尽管根据意向性分析时我们的结果略未达到统计学显著性,但它们表明,通过促进革兰阴性杆菌在胃内定植,升高胃内pH值的药物会增加接受机械通气患者发生医院获得性肺炎的风险。我们得出结论,在接受机械通气的患者中,使用一种预防性药物来预防应激性溃疡出血,同时保留天然胃酸屏障以防止细菌过度生长,可能比使用抗酸剂和H2受体阻滞剂更可取。

相似文献

1
Nosocomial pneumonia in intubated patients given sucralfate as compared with antacids or histamine type 2 blockers. The role of gastric colonization.与使用抗酸剂或组胺2型阻滞剂相比,接受硫糖铝治疗的插管患者发生医院获得性肺炎的情况。胃定植的作用。
N Engl J Med. 1987 Nov 26;317(22):1376-82. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711263172204.
2
[Mechanical ventilation-associated pneumonia and the prevention of stress ulcer. A randomized clinical trial of antacids and ranitidine versus sucralfate].[机械通气相关性肺炎与应激性溃疡的预防。抗酸剂和雷尼替丁与硫糖铝对比的随机临床试验]
Med Clin (Barc). 1994 Mar 26;102(11):407-11.
3
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.危重症患者应激性溃疡的预防:一项随机对照试验。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 May-Jun;51(57):757-61.
4
[Prevention of stress hemorrhage in an internal medicine intensive care station: sucralfate versus ranitidine].[内科重症监护病房应激性出血的预防:硫糖铝与雷尼替丁对比]
Anaesthesist. 1988 Nov;37(11):704-10.
5
The role of intragastric acidity and stress ulcus prophylaxis on colonization and infection in mechanically ventilated ICU patients. A stratified, randomized, double-blind study of sucralfate versus antacids.胃内酸度及应激性溃疡预防对机械通气重症监护病房患者细菌定植和感染的作用。硫糖铝与抗酸剂的分层、随机、双盲研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):1825-34. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520743.
6
Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients receiving antacid, ranitidine, or sucralfate as prophylaxis for stress ulcer. A randomized controlled trial.接受抗酸剂、雷尼替丁或硫糖铝预防应激性溃疡的机械通气患者的医院获得性肺炎。一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 15;120(8):653-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-8-199404150-00005.
7
A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.硫糖铝与雷尼替丁预防机械通气患者上消化道出血的比较。加拿大重症监护试验组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 19;338(12):791-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803193381203.
8
Optimal therapy for stress gastritis.应激性胃炎的最佳治疗方法。
Ann Surg. 1994 Sep;220(3):353-60; discussion 360-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199409000-00011.
9
Changing perspectives of H2 antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis.H2拮抗剂用于预防应激性溃疡的观点转变
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1993 Jun;5(2):325-31.
10
Stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients on ventilator.机械通气患者的应激性溃疡预防
Trop Gastroenterol. 2003 Jul-Sep;24(3):124-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacological interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units: a network meta-analysis.重症监护病房患者预防上消化道出血的药物干预:一项网状Meta分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jan 22;30(1):22-35. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112886.
2
Rebound Inverts the Bacteremia Prevention Effect of Antibiotic Based Decontamination Interventions in ICU Cohorts with Prolonged Length of Stay.在住院时间延长的重症监护病房队列中,反弹逆转了基于抗生素去污干预措施预防菌血症的效果。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;13(4):316. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040316.
3
The gut microbiota composition is linked to subsequent occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.
肠道微生物群组成与重症患者随后发生呼吸机相关性肺炎有关。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Sep 15;11(5):e0064123. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00641-23.
4
Incidence rate and risk factors of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.创伤性脑损伤患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的发病率及危险因素:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Apr 28;15(4):2068-2078. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-425. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Pharmacist-Led Intervention on the Inappropriate Use of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis Pharmacotherapy in Intensive Care Units: A Systematic review.药剂师主导的重症监护病房应激性溃疡预防药物治疗不当使用干预措施:一项系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 25;12:741724. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.741724. eCollection 2021.
6
Interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units.重症监护病房患者上消化道出血的预防干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 4;6(6):CD008687. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008687.pub2.
7
Unusually High Incidences of Staphylococcus aureus Infection within Studies of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention Using Topical Antibiotics: Benchmarking the Evidence Base.在使用局部抗生素预防呼吸机相关性肺炎的研究中,金黄色葡萄球菌感染的异常高发病率:对证据基础进行基准评估。
Microorganisms. 2018 Jan 4;6(1):2. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6010002.
8
Acid-Suppressive Therapy and Risk of Infections: Pros and Cons.抑酸治疗与感染风险:利弊分析
Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Jul;37(7):587-624. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0519-y.
9
In Reply.作为回复。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Feb 10;114(6):102. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0102.
10
Impact of selective digestive decontamination on respiratory tract Candida among patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. A meta-analysis.选择性消化道去污对疑似呼吸机相关性肺炎患者呼吸道念珠菌的影响。一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Jul;35(7):1121-35. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2643-7. Epub 2016 Apr 26.