Suppr超能文献

信件、绿卡、电话和明信片:减少自残、自杀未遂和自杀的简短接触干预的系统和元分析综述。

Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide.

机构信息

Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;206(3):184-90. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.147819.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in brief contact interventions for self-harm and suicide attempt.

AIMS

To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide.

METHOD

A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted of randomised controlled trials using brief contact interventions (telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts). Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine study quality and subgroup effects.

RESULTS

We found 14 eligible studies overall, of which 12 were amenable to meta-analyses. For any subsequent episode of self-harm or suicide attempt, there was a non-significant reduction in the overall pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.04, P = 0119) for intervention compared with control. The number of repetitions per person was significantly reduced in intervention v. control (incidence rate ratio IRR = 066, 95% CI 0.54-0.80, P<0001). There was no significant reduction in the odds of suicide in intervention compared with control (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.38).

CONCLUSIONS

A non-significant positive effect on repeated self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide and a significant effect on the number of episodes of repeated self-harm or suicide attempts per person (based on only three studies) means that brief contact interventions cannot yet be recommended for widespread clinical implementation. We recommend further assessment of possible benefits in well-designed trials in clinical populations.

摘要

背景

人们对用于自我伤害和自杀尝试的简短接触干预措施越来越感兴趣。

目的

综合关于简短接触干预措施减少自我伤害、自杀尝试和自杀的有效性的证据。

方法

对使用简短接触干预措施(电话联系;紧急或危机卡;明信片或信件联系)的随机对照试验进行系统评价和随机效应荟萃分析。进行了几项敏感性分析,以检查研究质量和亚组效应。

结果

我们总共发现了 14 项符合条件的研究,其中 12 项可进行荟萃分析。对于任何随后发生的自我伤害或自杀尝试事件,与对照组相比,干预组的总体汇总优势比(OR)无显著降低,为 0.87(95%CI 0.74-1.04,P=0.119)。与对照组相比,干预组中每例患者的重复次数明显减少(发生率比 IRR=0.66,95%CI 0.54-0.80,P<0.0001)。与对照组相比,干预组自杀的几率没有显著降低(OR=0.58,95%CI 0.24-1.38)。

结论

简短接触干预措施对重复自我伤害、自杀尝试和自杀有非显著的积极影响,对每例患者重复自我伤害或自杀尝试的次数有显著影响(基于仅三项研究),这意味着简短接触干预措施尚不能推荐广泛用于临床实施。我们建议在临床人群中进行设计良好的试验进一步评估可能的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验