He Lei, Wang Qiao, Zhao Xia
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China E-mail :
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):869-74. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.3.869.
The prognostic value of microvessel density (MVD), reflecting angiogenesis, detected in ovarian cancer is currently controversial. Here we performed a meta-analysis of all relevant eligible studies.
A comprehensive search of online PubMed, Medline, EMBASE and Sciencedirect was performed to identify all related articles. The search strategy was designed as 'microvessel density', 'ovarian cancer', 'ovarian neoplasm', 'CD34' and 'angiogenesis'.
The studies were categorized by author/year, number of patients, FIGO stage, histology, cutoff value for microvessel density, types of survival analysis, methods of hazard rations (HR) estimation, HR and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Combined hazard ratios suggested that high MVD was associated with poor overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with HR and 95% CIs of 1.84 (1.33-2.35) and 1.36 (1.06-1.66), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that high MVD detected by CD34 was relevant for OS [HR=1.67 (1.36-2.35)], but not MVD detected with other antibodies [HR=2.11 (0.90-3.31)]. Another subgroup analysis indicated that high MVD in patients without pre-chemotherapy, but not with pre- chemotherapy, was associated with OS [HR=1.88(1.59-2.18 and HR=1.70 (-0.18-3.59)].
The OS and PFS with high MVD were significant poorer than with low MVD in ovarian cancer patients. However, high MVD detected by CD34 seems to be more associated with survival for patients without pre-chemotherapy.
在卵巢癌中检测到的反映血管生成的微血管密度(MVD)的预后价值目前存在争议。在此,我们对所有相关的合格研究进行了荟萃分析。
对在线的PubMed、Medline、EMBASE和Sciencedirect进行全面检索,以识别所有相关文章。检索策略设计为“微血管密度”、“卵巢癌”、“卵巢肿瘤”、“CD34”和“血管生成”。
这些研究按作者/年份、患者数量、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期、组织学、微血管密度的截断值、生存分析类型、风险比(HR)估计方法、HR及其95%置信区间(CI)进行分类。合并风险比表明,高MVD与总体生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS)较差相关,HR及其95%CI分别为1.84(1.33 - 2.35)和1.36(1.06 - 1.66)。亚组分析显示,通过CD34检测到的高MVD与OS相关[HR = 1.67(1.36 - 2.35)],但与用其他抗体检测到的MVD无关[HR = 2.11(0.90 - 3.31)]。另一亚组分析表明,未接受化疗患者中的高MVD与OS相关[HR = 1.88(1.59 - 2.18)],而接受化疗患者中的高MVD与OS无关[HR = 1.70( - 0.18 - 3.59)]。
在卵巢癌患者中,高MVD组的OS和PFS显著低于低MVD组。然而,对于未接受化疗的患者,通过CD34检测到的高MVD似乎与生存更相关。