Suppr超能文献

根据严重程度分类的哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病的实用工具:一项综合文献综述

Utilities for asthma and COPD according to category of severity: a comprehensive literature review.

作者信息

Einarson Thomas R, Bereza Basil G, Nielsen T Anders, Hemels Michiel E H

机构信息

Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto , Toronto, ON , Canada.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2015;18(7):550-63. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1025793. Epub 2015 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are incurable diseases that impact quality-of-life.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize original research articles that measured or utilized preference-based utilities or disutilities according to disease severity.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched from inception until the end of November 2014. Two reviewers independently searched the literature with differences settled through discussion. Data extracted included utility scores as determined in original research categorized according to disease severity as well as disutilities associated with exacerbations or comorbidities. Data were tabulated and analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

In total, 862 articles were identified, 790 were rejected, and 69 analyzed. There were 44 dealing with COPD and 25 with asthma. Average utilities determined by research were 0.828 ± 0.062, 0.765 ± 0.090, 0.711 ± 0.120, and 0.607 ± 0.120 for mild, moderate, severe, and very severe COPD, respectively. Utilities used in economic analyses were 0.866 ± 0.038, 0.770 ± 0.024, 0.739 ± 0.045, and 0.596 ± 0.075, respectively. Disutilities (annual) ranged from 0.002-0.378; major and minor exacerbations had respective disutilities of 0.287 and 0.108. For asthma patients, utilities were for 0.86 ± 0.32, 0.83 ± 0.065, and 0.74 ± 0.029, for mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilities have been summarized according to severity category of asthma and COPD. These values should be useful for researchers undertaking economic analyses of these diseases.

摘要

背景

哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是影响生活质量的不治之症。

目的

总结根据疾病严重程度测量或使用基于偏好的效用或负效用的原始研究文章。

方法

检索Medline和Embase数据库,时间跨度从建库至2014年11月底。两名综述员独立检索文献,分歧通过讨论解决。提取的数据包括原始研究中根据疾病严重程度分类确定的效用得分,以及与病情加重或合并症相关的负效用。数据制成表格并进行描述性分析。

结果

共识别出862篇文章,790篇被排除,69篇进行分析。其中44篇涉及COPD,25篇涉及哮喘。研究确定的轻度、中度、重度和极重度COPD的平均效用分别为0.828±0.062、0.765±0.090、0.711±0.120和0.607±0.120。经济分析中使用的效用分别为0.866±0.038、0.770±0.024、0.739±0.045和0.596±0.075。负效用(每年)范围为0.002 - 0.378;严重和轻度病情加重的负效用分别为0.287和0.108。对于哮喘患者,轻度、中度和重度疾病的效用分别为0.86±0.32、0.83±0.065和0.74±0.029。

结论

已根据哮喘和COPD的严重程度类别总结了效用。这些值对于对这些疾病进行经济分析的研究人员应该是有用的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验