• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[血清学肿瘤标志物检测在卵巢癌患者中的诊断价值]

[Diagnostic value of serological tumor marker tests in patients with ovarian cancer].

作者信息

Kobayashi H, Sumimoto K, Terao T, Kawashima Y

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Oct;41(10):1501-6.

PMID:2573640
Abstract

The usefulness of tumor markers in serodiagnosis of cancer designed to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage was evaluated from the point of view of their diagnostic value. Namely, eight tumor markers, CA125, SLX, CA72-4, TPA, Fr, CEA, CA19-9, and SCC, were determined and studied to find the combination that would yield the optimal diagnostic value. For this purpose, the diagnostic value was calculated from sensitivity x specificity. As a single tumor marker CA125 proved optimal with a diagnostic value of 0.50. The higher value, 0.53, was obtained as the diagnostic value from the combination of two tumor markers, CA125 and CA72-4. When three tumor markers were combined, CA125, CA72-4 and SLX gave an optimal diagnostic value of 0.65. In the combination of four tumor markers, CA125, CA72-4, SLX and CA19-9 gave a diagnostic value of 0.63. In the five marker combination CA125, CA72-4, SLX, CA19-9 and TPA worked well and had a diagnostic value of 0.59. When the markers were increased to six types, CA125, CA72-4, SLX, CA19-9, TPA and Fr provided a combination with 0.53 as the diagnostic value. In the seven marker combination CA125, CA72-4, SLX, CA19-9, TPA, Fr and CEA gave a diagnostic value of 0.51. The efficiency declined to 0.51 when eight tumor markers were combined. When cost performance in the measurement of tumor markers for early detection of ovarian cancer is taken into account, a dilemma arises in that the increase in the number of tumor markers used is accompanied by higher sensitivity and lower specificity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

从诊断价值的角度评估了肿瘤标志物在旨在早期检测卵巢癌的癌症血清学诊断中的实用性。具体而言,测定并研究了八种肿瘤标志物,即CA125、SLX、CA72 - 4、TPA、Fr、CEA、CA19 - 9和SCC,以找出能产生最佳诊断价值的组合。为此,根据敏感性×特异性计算诊断价值。作为单一肿瘤标志物,CA125的诊断价值为0.50,被证明是最佳的。两种肿瘤标志物CA125和CA72 - 4组合的诊断价值更高,为0.53。当三种肿瘤标志物组合时,CA125、CA72 - 4和SLX的最佳诊断价值为0.65。在四种肿瘤标志物组合中,CA125、CA72 - 4、SLX和CA19 - 9的诊断价值为0.63。在五种标志物组合中,CA125、CA72 - 4、SLX、CA19 - 9和TPA效果良好,诊断价值为0.59。当标志物增加到六种时,CA125、CA72 - 4、SLX、CA19 - 9、TPA和Fr的组合诊断价值为0.53。在七种标志物组合中,CA125、CA72 - 4、SLX、CA19 - 9、TPA、Fr和CEA的诊断价值为0.51。当八种肿瘤标志物组合时,效率降至0.51。考虑到用于早期检测卵巢癌的肿瘤标志物测量中的性价比时,会出现一个两难困境,即使用的肿瘤标志物数量增加伴随着更高的敏感性和更低的特异性。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
[Diagnostic value of serological tumor marker tests in patients with ovarian cancer].[血清学肿瘤标志物检测在卵巢癌患者中的诊断价值]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Oct;41(10):1501-6.
2
Clinical usefulness of sialyl SSEA-1 antigen as tumor marker for ovarian cancer as compared with CA125, CA19-9, TPA, IAP, CEA and ferritin.与CA125、CA19-9、TPA、IAP、CEA和铁蛋白相比,唾液酸化SSEA-1抗原作为卵巢癌肿瘤标志物的临床应用价值。
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Feb;41(2):217-24.
3
[Diagnosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer by a combination assay of serum sialyl SSEA-1 antigen and CA125 levels].血清唾液酸化SSEA-1抗原与CA125水平联合检测用于卵巢癌的诊断及随访
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1989 Jun 20;24(6):1256-60.
4
Tumor markers for diagnosis, monitoring of recurrence and prognosis in patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.用于上消化道癌患者诊断、复发监测及预后评估的肿瘤标志物。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(23):10267-72. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.23.10267.
5
[Clinical usefulness of the combination assay of CA 125, SLX, and CA 72-4 in patients with ovarian cancer].[CA 125、SLX和CA 72-4联合检测在卵巢癌患者中的临床应用价值]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Nov;41(11):1731-5.
6
Evaluation of Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA125 and Ferritin as Diagnostic Markers and Factors of Clinical Parameters for Colorectal Cancer.评估血清 CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4、CA125 和铁蛋白作为结直肠癌的诊断标志物和临床参数的影响因素。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 9;8(1):2732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21048-y.
7
CA72-4 combined with CEA, CA125 and CAl9-9 improves the sensitivity for the early diagnosis of gastric cancer.CA72-4联合癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原125(CA125)和糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)可提高胃癌早期诊断的敏感性。
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Nov 1;437:183-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
8
Comparison of serum CA72-4, CEA, TPA, CA19-9 and CA125 levels in gastric cancer patients and correlation with recurrence.胃癌患者血清CA72-4、CEA、TPA、CA19-9和CA125水平的比较及其与复发的相关性
Hepatogastroenterology. 2002 Jul-Aug;49(46):1157-60.
9
[A study of localizations and serum data; four tumor markers (CA125, CA19-9, CEA and TPA) in ovarian cancers].[一项关于定位及血清数据的研究;卵巢癌中的四种肿瘤标志物(CA125、CA19-9、CEA和TPA)]
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1990 Jan 20;25(1):47-54.
10
The diagnostic value of five serum tumor markers for patients with cholangiocarcinoma.五种血清肿瘤标志物对胆管癌患者的诊断价值。
Clin Chim Acta. 2018 May;480:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.02.008. Epub 2018 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Significance of CA15-3 with Combination of HER-2/neu Values at 85th Percentiles in Breast Cancer.CA15-3与第85百分位数HER-2/neu值联合检测在乳腺癌中的诊断意义
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2013 Apr;28(2):136-40. doi: 10.1007/s12291-012-0288-6. Epub 2012 Dec 11.