Niedenberger Bryan A, Busada Jonathan T, Geyer Christopher B
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA.
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Diabetes and Obesity Institute East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27834, USA
Reproduction. 2015 Apr;149(4):329-38. doi: 10.1530/REP-14-0653.
Prospermatogonia transition to type A spermatogonia, which provide the source for the spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) pool. A percentage of these type A spermatogonia then differentiate to enter meiosis as spermatocytes by ∼P10. It is currently unclear as to when these distinct populations are initially formed in the neonatal testis, and when the expression of markers both characteristic of and required for the adult undifferentiated and differentiating states is established. In this study, we compared expression of known spermatogonial cell fate markers during normal development and in response to the differentiation signal provided by retinoic acid (RA). We found that some markers for the undifferentiated state (ZBTB16/PLZF and CDH1) were expressed in nearly all spermatogonia from P1 through P7. In contrast, differentiation markers (STRA8 and KIT) appeared in a subset of spermatogonia at P4, coincident with the onset of RA signaling. GFRA1, which was present in nearly all prospermatogonia at P1, was only retained in STRA8/KIT- spermatogonia. From P4 through P10, there was a great deal of heterogeneity in the male germ cell population in terms of expression of markers, as markers characteristic of the undifferentiated (except GFRA1) and differentiating states were co-expressed through this interval. After P10, these fate markers diverged to mark distinct populations of undifferentiated and differentiating spermatogonia, and this pattern was maintained in juvenile (P18) and adult (P>60) testes. Taken together, these results reveal that the spermatogonia population is heterogeneous during the first wave of spermatogenesis, and indicate that neonatal spermatogonia may not serve as an ideal substitute for studying the function of adult spermatogonia.
原始精原细胞转变为A型精原细胞,后者为精原干细胞(SSC)库提供来源。其中一部分A型精原细胞随后分化,在约P10时作为精母细胞进入减数分裂。目前尚不清楚这些不同的细胞群体在新生睾丸中最初何时形成,以及成年未分化和分化状态所特有的及必需的标志物的表达何时确立。在本研究中,我们比较了正常发育过程中以及对视黄酸(RA)提供的分化信号作出反应时已知精原细胞命运标志物的表达。我们发现,一些未分化状态的标志物(ZBTB16/PLZF和CDH1)在从P1到P7的几乎所有精原细胞中均有表达。相比之下,分化标志物(STRA8和KIT)在P4时出现在一部分精原细胞中,与RA信号的起始一致。GFRA1在P1时几乎存在于所有原始精原细胞中,仅保留在STRA8/KIT阴性的精原细胞中。从P4到P10,雄性生殖细胞群体在标志物表达方面存在很大异质性,因为未分化(GFRA1除外)和分化状态的标志物在此期间共同表达。P10之后,这些命运标志物分化以标记未分化和分化精原细胞的不同群体,并且这种模式在幼年(P18)和成年(P>60)睾丸中得以维持。综上所述,这些结果表明在精子发生的第一波过程中精原细胞群体是异质性的,并且表明新生精原细胞可能不是研究成年精原细胞功能的理想替代物。