Tsukada Sachiyuki, Wakui Motohiro, Hoshino Akiho
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nekoyama Miyao Hospital, 14-7 Konan, Chuo-ku, Niigata, Niigata 950-1151, Japan. E-mail address for S. Tsukada:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kawaguchi Kogyo General Hospital, 1-18-15 Aoki, Kawaguchi, Saitama 332-0031, Japan.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Mar 4;97(5):367-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00373.
Periarticular injection is becoming more commonly utilized for pain relief following total knee arthroplasty. However, we are aware of no randomized controlled trial that has investigated the efficacy of periarticular injection for pain relief after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
We performed a randomized controlled trial of patients scheduled for simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Seventy-one patients with 142 involved knees were randomly assigned to receive periarticular injection or epidural analgesia. Other perioperative interventions, including spinal anesthesia, surgical techniques, and postoperative medication protocols, were identical for all patients. The primary outcome was postoperative pain at rest, measured with the use of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) during the initial twenty-four-hour postoperative period. The cumulative VAS score was calculated with use of the area under the curve and compared between the groups.
Postoperative pain at rest, quantified as the area under the curve of serial assessments during the initial twenty-four-hour postoperative period, was significantly less in the periarticular injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (174.9 ± 181.5 mm × day compared with 360.4 ± 360.6 mm × day; p = 0.0073). The prevalences of nausea on the night of surgery and postoperative day 1 and of pruritus were significantly lower in the periarticular injection group than in the epidural analgesia group (14% and 45%, p = 0.0031; 14% and 55%, p = 0.0003; and 0% and 15%, p = 0.014, respectively).
Periarticular injection was associated with better pain relief during the first twenty-four hours following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty and decreased opioid-related side effects compared with epidural analgesia. Periarticular injection may be preferable to epidural analgesia for pain relief after simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty.
关节周围注射在全膝关节置换术后用于缓解疼痛正变得越来越普遍。然而,我们所知尚无随机对照试验研究关节周围注射对同期双侧全膝关节置换术后疼痛缓解的疗效。
我们对计划行同期双侧全膝关节置换术的患者进行了一项随机对照试验。71例患者的142个受累膝关节被随机分配接受关节周围注射或硬膜外镇痛。所有患者的其他围手术期干预措施,包括脊髓麻醉、手术技术和术后药物治疗方案均相同。主要结局是术后静息痛,在术后最初24小时内使用100毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行测量。通过计算曲线下面积得出累积VAS评分,并在组间进行比较。
关节周围注射组术后静息痛(以术后最初24小时内连续评估的曲线下面积量化)明显低于硬膜外镇痛组(分别为174.9±181.5毫米×天和360.4±360.6毫米×天;p = 0.0073)。关节周围注射组术后当晚和术后第1天恶心以及瘙痒的发生率明显低于硬膜外镇痛组(分别为14%和45%,p = 0.0031;14%和55%,p = 0.0003;0%和15%,p = 0.014)。
与硬膜外镇痛相比,关节周围注射在同期双侧全膝关节置换术后的头24小时内疼痛缓解效果更好,且阿片类药物相关副作用减少。对于同期双侧全膝关节置换术后的疼痛缓解,关节周围注射可能比硬膜外镇痛更可取。