Hofmann M, Bruelheide H
Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Am Kirchtor 1, 06108, Halle (Saale), Germany,
J Biosci. 2015 Mar;40(1):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s12038-015-9505-9.
The differences in timing in bud burst between species have been interpreted as an adaptation to late frost events in spring. Thus, it has been suggested that the degree of frost susceptibility of leaves is species-specific and depends on the species' phenology and geographic distribution range. To test for relationships between frost tolerance and phenology as well as between frost tolerance and distribution range across Central European tree species, we studied the frost hardiness of closed buds before bud burst and of freshly opened buds at the time of bud burst. We hypothesized that species with early bud burst and species distributed in eastern and northern areas were more frost tolerant than species with late bud burst and species distributed in western and southern areas. Frost hardiness was estimated by exposing twigs to 11 frost temperatures between -4 °C and -80 °C and by assessing tissue damage by the electrolyte leakage method. In contrast to our hypotheses, neither frost hardiness of closed buds nor frost hardiness of freshly opened buds were related to any variable describing species' macroclimatic niche. Furthermore, frost hardiness of freshly opened buds did not differ among species. Thus, the investigated species with early bud burst take higher risks of frost damage than the species with late bud bursts. These findings indicate that frost hardiness might not play the key role in limiting the geographic distribution ranges previously anticipated.
物种之间芽萌发时间的差异被解释为对春季晚霜事件的一种适应。因此,有人提出叶片的霜冻敏感性程度是物种特异性的,并且取决于物种的物候和地理分布范围。为了测试中欧树种的抗冻性与物候之间以及抗冻性与分布范围之间的关系,我们研究了芽萌发前封闭芽和芽萌发时刚开放芽的抗冻性。我们假设芽萌发早的物种以及分布在东部和北部地区的物种比芽萌发晚的物种以及分布在西部和南部地区的物种更抗冻。通过将嫩枝暴露在-4℃至-80℃之间的11个霜冻温度下,并通过电解质渗漏法评估组织损伤来估计抗冻性。与我们的假设相反,封闭芽的抗冻性和刚开放芽的抗冻性均与描述物种宏观气候生态位的任何变量无关。此外,刚开放芽的抗冻性在物种之间没有差异。因此,所研究的芽萌发早的物种比芽萌发晚的物种遭受霜冻损害的风险更高。这些发现表明,抗冻性可能并未在限制先前预期的地理分布范围方面发挥关键作用。