Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Genova, Italy.
Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Lancet. 2015 May 9;385(9980):1863-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62048-1. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
Whether addition of fluorouracil to epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel (EC-P) is favourable in adjuvant treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer is controversial, as is the benefit of increased density of dosing. We aimed to address these questions in terms of improvements in disease-free survival.
In this 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients aged 18-70 years with operable, node positive, early-stage breast cancer from 81 Italian centres. Eligible patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio with a centralised, interactive online system to receive either dose-dense chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 2 weeks with pegfilgrastim support) with fluorouracil plus EC-P (FEC-P) or EC-P or to receive standard-interval chemotherapy (administered intravenously every 3 weeks) with FEC-P or EC-P. The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival, assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method in the intention-to-treat population. Our primary comparisons were between dose schedule (every 2 weeks vs every 3 weeks) and dose type (FEC-P vs EC-P). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433420.
Between April 24, 2003, and July 3, 2006, we recruited 2091 patients. 88 patients were enrolled in centres that only provided standard-intensity dosing. After a median follow-up of 7·0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4·5-6·3), 140 (26%) of 545 patients given EC-P every 3 weeks, 157 (29%) of 544 patients given FEC-P every 3 weeks, 111 (22%) of 502 patients given EC-P every 2 weeks, and 113 (23%) of 500 patients given FEC-P every 2 weeks had a disease-free survival event. For the dose-density comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 81% (95% CI 79-84) in patients treated every 2 weeks and 76% (74-79) in patients treated every 3 weeks (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·65-0·92; p=0·004); overall survival rates at 5 years were 94% (93-96) and 89% (87-91; HR 0·65, 0·51-0·84; p=0·001) and for the chemotherapy-type comparison, disease-free survival at 5 years was 78% (75-81) in the FEC-P groups and 79% (76-82) in the EC-P groups (HR 1·06, 0·89-1·25; p=0·561); overall survival rates at 5 years were 91% (89-93) and 92% (90-94; 1·16, 0·91-1·46; p=0·234). Compared with 3 week dosing, chemotherapy every 2 weeks was associated with increased rate of grade 3-4 of anaemia (14 [1·4%] of 988 patients vs two [0·2%] of 984 patients; p=0·002); transaminitis (19 [1·9%] vs four [0·4%]; p=0·001), and myalgias (31 [3·1%] vs 16 [1·6%]; p=0·019), and decreased rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (147 [14·9%] vs 433 [44·0%]; p<0·0001). Addition of fluorouracil led to increased rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (354 [34·5%] of 1025 patients on FEC-P vs 250 [24·2%] of 1032 patients on EC-P; p<0·0001), fever (nine [0·9%] vs two [0·2%]), nausea (47 [4·6%] vs 28 [2·7%]), and vomiting (32 [3·1%] vs 15 [1·4%]).
In patients with node-positive early breast cancer, dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival compared with standard interval chemotherapy. Addition of fluorouracil to a sequential EC-P regimen was not associated with an improved disease-free survival outcome.
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pharmacia, and Dompè Biotec.
在淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的辅助治疗中,氟尿嘧啶联合表柔比星、环磷酰胺和紫杉醇(EC-P)的加入是否有利,以及增加给药密度是否有益,这两个问题存在争议。我们旨在针对无病生存的改善来解决这些问题。
在这项 2×2 的析因、开放性、3 期临床试验中,我们从 81 家意大利中心招募了年龄在 18-70 岁、可手术、淋巴结阳性、早期乳腺癌的患者。符合条件的患者以 1:1:1:1 的比例通过中央交互式在线系统随机分配,接受密集剂量化疗(每 2 周静脉注射一次,并用培非格司亭支持)加氟尿嘧啶加 EC-P(FEC-P)或 EC-P,或接受标准间隔化疗(每 3 周静脉注射一次)加 FEC-P 或 EC-P。主要研究终点是无病生存,采用 Kaplan-Meier 法在意向治疗人群中评估。我们的主要比较是剂量方案(每 2 周与每 3 周)和剂量类型(FEC-P 与 EC-P)。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00433420。
2003 年 4 月 24 日至 2006 年 7 月 3 日期间,我们招募了 2091 名患者。88 名患者在只提供标准强度剂量的中心接受治疗。中位随访 7.0 年(四分位距[IQR]4.5-6.3)后,在接受每 3 周 EC-P 治疗的 545 名患者中,140 名(26%)、接受每 3 周 FEC-P 治疗的 544 名患者中,157 名(29%)、接受每 2 周 EC-P 治疗的 502 名患者中,111 名(22%)、接受每 2 周 FEC-P 治疗的 500 名患者中,113 名(23%)发生了无病生存事件。在剂量密度比较中,接受每 2 周治疗的患者 5 年无病生存率为 81%(95%CI 79-84),接受每 3 周治疗的患者为 76%(74-79)(HR 0.77,95%CI 0.65-0.92;p=0.004);5 年总生存率分别为 94%(93-96)和 89%(87-91)(HR 0.65,0.51-0.84;p=0.001),而在化疗类型比较中,接受 FEC-P 治疗的患者 5 年无病生存率为 78%(75-81),接受 EC-P 治疗的患者为 79%(76-82)(HR 1.06,0.89-1.25;p=0.561);5 年总生存率分别为 91%(89-93)和 92%(90-94)(1.16,0.91-1.46;p=0.234)。与 3 周给药相比,每 2 周化疗更常导致 3-4 级贫血(988 名患者中 14 名[1.4%] vs 984 名患者中 2 名[0.2%];p=0.002)、转氨基酶升高(19 名[1.9%] vs 4 名[0.4%];p=0.001)和肌痛(31 名[3.1%] vs 16 名[1.6%];p=0.019),并降低 3-4 级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率(147 名[14.9%] vs 433 名[44.0%];p<0.0001)。氟尿嘧啶的加入导致 3-4 级中性粒细胞减少症的发生率增加(FEC-P 组的 1025 名患者中有 354 名[34.5%] vs EC-P 组的 1032 名患者中有 250 名[24.2%];p<0.0001)、发热(9 名[0.9%] vs 2 名[0.2%])、恶心(47 名[4.6%] vs 28 名[2.7%])和呕吐(32 名[3.1%] vs 15 名[1.4%])。
在淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌患者中,密集剂量辅助化疗改善了无病生存。氟尿嘧啶联合 EC-P 方案并不能提高无病生存结局。
百时美施贵宝、法玛西亚和多普蒂。