• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与指标可预测生活方式干预中的健康变化。

Engagement indicators predict health changes in a lifestyle intervention.

作者信息

Thomson Jessica L, Tussing-Humphreys Lisa M, Goodman Melissa H, Zoellner Jamie M

机构信息

US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS, USA.

Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Behav. 2015 May;39(3):409-20. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.3.13.

DOI:10.5993/AJHB.39.3.13
PMID:25741685
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of several participant engagement indicators for predicting health changes in a church-based lifestyle intervention shown effective for improving dietary, physical activity, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Descriptive indicators were constructed using 2 participant engagement measures - education session attendance (EDA) and exercise class attendance (EXA) - separately and combined. Relationships of 6 engagement indicators to health outcomes were tested using generalized linear mixed models.

RESULTS

EDA predicted 5 dietary and 1 clinical outcome, whereas EXA predicted one physical activity and one clinical outcome. The combined indicator predicted the same 7 outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Use of single engagement indicators specific to each intervention component is advocated for predicting relevant health outcome.

摘要

目的

评估几种参与者参与度指标在预测一项基于教会的生活方式干预中健康变化方面的效用,该干预已被证明对改善饮食、身体活动和临床结果有效。

方法

使用两种参与者参与度测量方法——教育课程出席率(EDA)和健身课程出席率(EXA)——分别构建描述性指标,并将它们合并。使用广义线性混合模型测试6种参与度指标与健康结果之间的关系。

结果

EDA预测了5项饮食和1项临床结果,而EXA预测了1项身体活动和1项临床结果。合并指标预测了相同的7项结果。

结论

提倡使用针对每个干预组成部分的单一参与度指标来预测相关健康结果。

相似文献

1
Engagement indicators predict health changes in a lifestyle intervention.参与指标可预测生活方式干预中的健康变化。
Am J Health Behav. 2015 May;39(3):409-20. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.3.13.
2
Participant adherence indicators predict changes in blood pressure, anthropometric measures, and self-reported physical activity in a lifestyle intervention: HUB city steps.参与者依从性指标可预测生活方式干预中血压、人体测量指标及自我报告的身体活动的变化:枢纽城市步数计划。
Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb;42(1):84-91. doi: 10.1177/1090198114537069. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
3
A self-management concept for men at the community level: the 'Waist' Disposal Challenge.社区层面针对男性的自我管理理念:“腰围”处置挑战。
J Health Psychol. 2009 Jul;14(5):663-74. doi: 10.1177/1359105309104910.
4
Exploring non-health outcomes of health promotion: the perspective of participants in a lifestyle behaviour change intervention.探索健康促进的非健康结果:生活方式行为改变干预参与者的观点。
Health Policy. 2012 Jul;106(2):177-86. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
A prospective study of church attendance and health over the lifespan.一项关于一生中参加教堂活动与健康状况的前瞻性研究。
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):117-24. doi: 10.1037/a0012984.
6
Prescribing physical activity for healthy aging: longitudinal follow-up and mixed method analysis of a primary care intervention.为健康老龄化开运动处方:初级保健干预的纵向随访和混合方法分析。
Phys Sportsmed. 2014 Nov;42(4):30-8. doi: 10.3810/psm.2014.11.2089.
7
The results of a worksite health promotion programme in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.马来西亚吉隆坡一项工作场所健康促进计划的结果。
Health Promot Int. 2006 Dec;21(4):301-10. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dal031. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
8
Effects of an intensive diet and physical activity modification program on the health risks of adults.强化饮食与身体活动调整计划对成年人健康风险的影响。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 Mar;105(3):371-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.007.
9
A survey of US chiropractors on clinical preventive services.一项针对美国脊椎按摩师临床预防服务的调查。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jun;27(5):287-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.04.002.
10
Predicting healthy lifestyle patterns among retirement age older adults in the WELL study: a latent class analysis of sex differences.WELL 研究中退休年龄老年人健康生活方式模式的预测:基于性别差异的潜在类别分析。
Maturitas. 2014 Jan;77(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing engagement in in-person and remotely delivered lifestyle interventions for young adults with serious mental illness: A qualitative study.影响严重精神疾病青年参与线下和远程生活方式干预的因素:一项定性研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;18(1):42-48. doi: 10.1111/eip.13432. Epub 2023 May 23.
2
Predictors of engagement and outcome achievement in a behavioural intervention targeting sugar-sweetened beverage intake among rural adults.针对农村成年人含糖饮料摄入量的行为干预中参与度和结果实现的预测因素。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Feb;23(3):554-563. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003392. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Predicting Outcomes from Engagement With Specific Components of an Internet-Based Physical Activity Intervention With Financial Incentives: Process Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
基于网络的体育活动干预特定组成部分与经济激励措施结合后的结果预测:一项整群随机对照试验的过程分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 19;21(4):e11394. doi: 10.2196/11394.
4
Psychosocial constructs were not mediators of intervention effects for dietary and physical activity outcomes in a church-based lifestyle intervention: Delta Body and Soul III.在一项基于教会的生活方式干预“Delta Body and Soul III”中,心理社会因素并非饮食和身体活动结果干预效果的中介因素。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(11):2060-9. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015003602. Epub 2016 Jan 22.