Smeets Fabienne G M, Keszthelyi Daniel, Bouvy Nicole D, Masclee Ad A M, Conchillo Jose M
Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
NUTRIM, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University , Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Mar 30;21(2):255-64. doi: 10.5056/jnm14111.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), an increased esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility has been described. Assessment of EGJ distensibility with the endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) technique might identify patients responsive to transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), whereas postoperative measurement of EGJ distensibility might provide insight into the antireflux mechanism of TIF. Therefore, we investigated the value of the EndoFLIP technique in GERD patients treated by TIF.
Forty-two GERD patients underwent EGJ distensibility measurement before TIF using the EndoFLIP technique. In a subgroup of 25 patients, EndoFLIP measurement was repeated both postoperative and at 6 months follow-up. Treatment outcome was assessed according to esophageal acid exposure time (AET; objective outcome) and symptom scores (clinical outcome) 6 months after TIF.
Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative EGJ distensibility (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.78; P = 0.023) and preoperative AET (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.90; P = 0.013) were independent predictors for objective treatment outcome but not for clinical outcome after TIF. The best cut-off value for objective outcome was 2.3 mm(2)/mmHg for preoperative EGJ distensibility and 11% for preoperative AET. EGJ distensibility decreased direct postoperative from 2.0 (1.2-3.3) to 1.4 (1.0-2.2) mm(2)/mmHg (P = 0.014), but increased to 2.2 (1.5-3.0) at 6 months follow-up (P = 0.925, compared to preoperative).
Preoperative EGJ distensibility and preoperative AET were independent predictors for objective treatment outcome but not for clinical outcome after TIF. According to our data, the EndoFLIP technique has no added value either in the preoperative diagnostic work-up or in the post-procedure evaluation of endoluminal antireflux therapy.
背景/目的:在胃食管反流病(GERD)患者中,食管胃交界部(EGJ)扩张性增加已有相关描述。采用内镜功能性管腔成像探头(EndoFLIP)技术评估EGJ扩张性可能有助于识别经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)的反应性患者,而术后测量EGJ扩张性可能有助于深入了解TIF的抗反流机制。因此,我们研究了EndoFLIP技术在接受TIF治疗的GERD患者中的价值。
42例GERD患者在TIF术前采用EndoFLIP技术测量EGJ扩张性。在25例患者的亚组中,术后及随访6个月时重复进行EndoFLIP测量。根据TIF术后6个月的食管酸暴露时间(AET;客观结果)和症状评分(临床结果)评估治疗效果。
多因素logistic回归分析显示,术前EGJ扩张性(OR,0.16;95%CI,0.03 - 0.78;P = 0.023)和术前AET(OR,0.62;95%CI,0.42 - 0.90;P = 0.013)是TIF术后客观治疗效果的独立预测因素,但不是临床效果的独立预测因素。客观结果的最佳截断值为术前EGJ扩张性2.3 mm²/mmHg和术前AET 11%。术后EGJ扩张性直接从2.0(1.2 - 3.3)降至1.4(1.0 - 2.2)mm²/mmHg(P = 0.014),但在随访6个月时升至2.2(1.5 - 3.0)(与术前相比,P = 0.925)。
术前EGJ扩张性和术前AET是TIF术后客观治疗效果的独立预测因素,但不是临床效果的独立预测因素。根据我们的数据,EndoFLIP技术在术前诊断评估或腔内抗反流治疗术后评估中均无附加价值。