Suppr超能文献

Brugada 综合征患者植入型心律转复除颤器治疗:单中心 20 年经验。

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in Brugada syndrome: a 20-year single-center experience.

机构信息

Heart Rhythm Management Centre UZ Brussel-VUB, Brussels, Belgium.

Heart Rhythm Management Centre UZ Brussel-VUB, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Mar 10;65(9):879-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.12.031.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with Brugada syndrome and aborted sudden cardiac death or syncope have higher risks for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and should undergo implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Device-based management of asymptomatic patients is controversial. ICD therapy is associated with high rates of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to investigate clinical features, management, and long-term follow-up of ICD therapy in patients with Brugada syndrome.

METHODS

Patients presenting with spontaneous or drug-induced Brugada type 1 electrocardiographic findings, who underwent ICD implantation and continuous follow-up at a single institution, were eligible for this study.

RESULTS

A total of 176 consecutive patients were included. During a mean follow-up period of 83.8 ± 57.3 months, spontaneous sustained VAs occurred in 30 patients (17%). Eight patients (4.5%) died. Appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 28 patients (15.9%), and 33 patients (18.7%) had inappropriate shocks. Electrical storm occurred in 4 subjects (2.3%). Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) experienced device-related complications. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, aborted sudden cardiac death and VA inducibility on electrophysiologic studies were independent predictors of appropriate shock occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD therapy was an effective strategy in Brugada syndrome, treating potentially lethal arrhythmias in 17% of patients during long-term follow-up. Appropriate shocks were significantly associated with the presence of aborted sudden cardiac death but also occurred in 13% of asymptomatic patients. Risk stratification by electrophysiologic study may identify asymptomatic patients at risk for arrhythmic events and could be helpful in investigating syncope not related to VAs. ICD placement is frequently associated with device-related complications, and rates of inappropriate shocks remain high regardless of careful device programming.

摘要

背景

患有 Brugada 综合征且发生过心搏骤停或晕厥性猝倒的患者,其发生室性心律失常(VA)的风险更高,应接受植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗。无症状患者的器械治疗存在争议。ICD 治疗与不适当电击和器械相关并发症的发生率较高相关。

目的

本研究旨在探讨 Brugada 综合征患者 ICD 治疗的临床特征、管理和长期随访。

方法

在一家医疗机构接受 ICD 植入和连续随访,出现自发性或药物诱导 Brugada 1 型心电图表现的患者符合本研究标准。

结果

共有 176 例连续患者入选。在平均 83.8±57.3 个月的随访期间,30 例(17%)患者发生自发性持续性 VA。8 例(4.5%)患者死亡。28 例(15.9%)患者发生适当 ICD 电击,33 例(18.7%)患者发生不适当电击。4 例(2.3%)患者发生电风暴。28 例(15.9%)患者出现器械相关并发症。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,心搏骤停和电生理研究中 VA 的易发性是适当电击发生的独立预测因素。

结论

在 Brugada 综合征中,ICD 治疗是一种有效的策略,在长期随访中,17%的患者出现潜在致命性心律失常。适当电击与心搏骤停的发生显著相关,但也发生在 13%的无症状患者中。电生理研究的风险分层可以识别有发生心律失常风险的无症状患者,并有助于对与 VA 无关的晕厥进行研究。尽管仔细的器械编程,ICD 放置仍常与器械相关并发症相关,且不适当电击的发生率仍然较高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验