Suppr超能文献

风险与效果的概念化:一项关于女性及医疗服务提供者对非手术女性永久性避孕看法的定性研究

Conceptualizing risk and effectiveness: a qualitative study of women's and providers' perceptions of nonsurgical female permanent contraception.

作者信息

Harrington Elizabeth K, Gordon Diana, Osgood-Roach Isabel, Jensen Jeffrey T, Aengst Jennifer

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mail code L466, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239.

Oregon National Primate Research Center, 1505 NW 185th Ave, Beaverton, OR 97006.

出版信息

Contraception. 2015 Aug;92(2):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Novel approaches to nonsurgical permanent contraception (NSPC) for women that are low cost and require no incision or hysteroscope/surgical equipment could improve access to, and the acceptability of, permanent contraception (PC). To better understand opportunities and limitations for NSPC approaches, we examined women's and obstetrician-gynecologist (OB/GYN) providers' perceptions of NSPC in Portland, OR.

STUDY DESIGN

Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 40 women recruited from outpatient clinics with purposive sampling, and a focus group was conducted with 9 OB/GYNs in academic and community practice. Transcripts were coded and inductively analyzed with a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

The majority of women identified as white (67%) or Latina (25%). They had a median age of 31.5 years, and median number of children was one. Perspectives on NSPC were closely aligned with women's general attitudes towards PC; over half were considering PC for themselves or partners in the future. Most respondents valued multiple aspects of a nonsurgical approach, with themes of minimizing recovery time, invasiveness and risk and avoiding hormonal contraception. Many assumed that NSPC would be less effective than surgery, however, and felt that a confirmation test would be necessary regardless of the failure rate. Providers welcomed efforts to expand contraceptive choice with NSPC, but would require long-term safety and efficacy data before recommending, and voiced concerns that NSPC's potential relative ease of administration could undermine the inherent seriousness of choosing PC.

CONCLUSIONS

Women's and providers' perceptions of NSPC hinged on the ways in which they conceptualized risk and effectiveness. While perceptions were generally favorable, confirmation of safety and effectiveness would be required for a new approach to be accepted.

IMPLICATIONS

This hypothesis-generating study elucidates women's and provider's perspectives on new methods of NSPC and contributes to understanding their perceptions of various types of risk. A technique to verify tubal occlusion would be needed for women and providers to accept NSPC.

摘要

目的

开发低成本、无需切口或宫腔镜/手术设备的女性非手术永久性避孕(NSPC)新方法,有望提高永久性避孕(PC)的可及性和可接受性。为更好地了解NSPC方法的机遇与局限,我们调查了俄勒冈州波特兰市女性及妇产科(OB/GYN)医生对NSPC的看法。

研究设计

采用目的抽样法,对从门诊诊所招募的40名女性进行半结构化定性访谈,并对9名学术及社区医疗机构的妇产科医生进行焦点小组访谈。对访谈记录进行编码,并采用扎根理论方法进行归纳分析。

结果

大多数女性为白人(67%)或拉丁裔(25%)。她们的年龄中位数为31.5岁,子女数中位数为1个。对NSPC的看法与女性对PC的总体态度密切相关;超过半数的女性未来会考虑为自己或伴侣选择PC。大多数受访者重视非手术方法的多个方面,主题包括缩短恢复时间、降低侵入性和风险以及避免使用激素避孕。然而,许多人认为NSPC的效果不如手术,并且觉得无论失败率如何,都需要进行确认测试。医生们欢迎通过NSPC扩大避孕选择的努力,但在推荐之前需要长期的安全性和有效性数据,并表示担心NSPC相对简便的给药方式可能会削弱选择PC的严肃性。

结论

女性和医生对NSPC的看法取决于她们对风险和有效性的概念化方式。虽然总体看法较为积极,但新方法要被接受需要确认其安全性和有效性。

启示

这项产生假设的研究阐明了女性和医生对NSPC新方法的看法,并有助于理解他们对各种风险的认知。女性和医生要接受NSPC,需要一种验证输卵管阻塞的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验