Leung Howan, Zhu Cannon X L, Chan Danny T M, Poon Wai S, Shi Lin, Mok Vincent C T, Wong Lawrence K S
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2049-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
High-frequency oscillations (HFOs, 80-500Hz) from intracranial electroencephalography (EEG) may represent a biomarker of epileptogenicity for epilepsy. We explored the relationship between ictal HFOs and hyperexcitability with a view to improving surgical outcome.
We evaluated 262 patients with refractory epilepsy. Fifteen patients underwent electrode implantation, and surgical resection was performed in 12 patients using a semi-prospective design. Ictal intracranial EEGs were examined by continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Significant ictal HFOs were denoted by normalized wavelet power above the 50th percentile across all channels. Each patient underwent functional mapping with cortical electrical stimulation. Hyperexcitability was defined as the appearance of afterdischarges or clinical seizures after electrical stimulation (50Hz, biphasic, pulse width=0.5ms, 5s, 5mA).
Among the group of patients achieving Engel Class I/II outcome at 1+ year, the mean proportion of significant ictal HFOs among resected channels for any given patient was 69% (33.3-100%). The respective figures for conventional frequency ictal patterns (CFIPs), hyperexcitability, and radiological lesion were 68.3% (26.3-100%), 39.6% (0-100%), and 52.8% (0-100%). Statistical significance was only achieved with ictal HFOs when comparing patients with Engel Class I/II outcomes versus III/IV outcomes (12.6% vs. 4.2%, the number of channels as the denominator, p=0.005). Further analysis from all patients irrespective of the surgical outcome showed that ictal HFOs co-occurred with CFIP (p<0.001), hyperexcitability (p<0.001), and radiological lesion (p<0.001). The combination of ictal HFOs/hyperexcitability improved the sensitivity from 66.7% to 100%, and the specificity from 66.7% to 75% when compared with ictal HFOs or hyperexcitability alone.
We confirmed the utility of ictal HFOs in determining surgical outcome. Ictal HFOs are affiliated to cortical hyperexcitability, which may represent a pathological manifestation of epileptogenicity.
Presurgical evaluation of refractory epilepsy may incorporate both ictal HFOs and cortical stimulation in determining epileptogenic foci.
颅内脑电图(EEG)中的高频振荡(HFOs,80 - 500Hz)可能是癫痫致痫性的生物标志物。我们探讨了发作期HFOs与兴奋性过高之间的关系,以期改善手术效果。
我们评估了262例难治性癫痫患者。15例患者接受了电极植入,采用半前瞻性设计对12例患者进行了手术切除。通过连续小波变换(CWT)检查发作期颅内EEG。显著的发作期HFOs通过所有通道上第50百分位数以上的归一化小波功率来表示。每位患者均接受了皮质电刺激功能定位。兴奋性过高定义为电刺激(50Hz,双相,脉宽 = 0.5ms,5s,5mA)后出现放电后发放或临床发作。
在术后1年以上达到恩格尔I/II级结果的患者组中,任何给定患者切除通道中显著发作期HFOs的平均比例为69%(33.3 - 100%)。传统频率发作期模式(CFIPs)、兴奋性过高和放射学病变的相应比例分别为68.3%(26.3 - 100%)、39.6%(0 - 100%)和52.8%(0 - 100%)。在比较恩格尔I/II级结果与III/IV级结果的患者时,仅发作期HFOs具有统计学意义(以通道数为分母,12.6%对4.2%,p = 0.005)。对所有患者无论手术结果如何进行的进一步分析表明,发作期HFOs与CFIP(p < 0.001)、兴奋性过高(p < 0.001)和放射学病变(p < 0.001)同时出现。与单独的发作期HFOs或兴奋性过高相比,发作期HFOs/兴奋性过高的组合将敏感性从66.7%提高到100%,特异性从66.7%提高到75%。
我们证实了发作期HFOs在确定手术结果方面的效用。发作期HFOs与皮质兴奋性过高相关,这可能代表致痫性的一种病理表现。
难治性癫痫的术前评估在确定致痫灶时可同时纳入发作期HFOs和皮质刺激。