• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调强放射治疗时代T4期鼻咽癌的同步化疗

Concurrent chemotherapy for T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

作者信息

Cao Cai-neng, Luo Jing-wei, Gao Li, Yi Jun-lin, Huang Xiao-dong, Wang Kai, Zhang Shi-ping, Qu Yuan, Li Su-yan, Xiao Jian-ping, Zhang Zhong, Xu Guo-zhen

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119101. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119101
PMID:25747589
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4352046/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate concurrent chemotherapy for T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

From July 2004 to June 2011, 180 non-metastatic T4 classification NPC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 117 patients were treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using IMRT and 63 cases were treated by IMRT alone.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 58.97 months (range, 2.79-114.92) months. For all the patients, the 1, 3 and 5-year local failure-free survival (LFFS) rates were 97.7%, 89.2% and 85.9%, regional failure free survival (RFFS) rates were 98.9%, 94.4% and 94.4%, distant failure-free survival (DFFS) rates were 89.7%, 79.9% and 76.2%, and overall survival (OS) rates were 92.7%, 78.9% and 65.3%, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in LFFS, RFFS, DFFS and OS between the CCRT group and the IMRT alone group. No statistically significant difference was observed in acute toxicity except leukopenia (p = 0.000) during IMRT between the CCRT group and the IMRT alone group.

CONCLUSION

IMRT alone for T4 classification NPC achieved similar treatment outcomes in terms of disease local control and overall survival as compared to concurrent chemotherapy plus IMRT. However, this is a retrospective study with a limited number of patients, such results need further investigation in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

摘要

目的

评估调强放射治疗(IMRT)联合化疗治疗T4期鼻咽癌(NPC)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2004年7月至2011年6月期间180例非转移性T4期NPC患者。其中,117例患者接受IMRT同步放化疗(CCRT),63例患者仅接受IMRT治疗。

结果

中位随访时间为58.97个月(范围2.79 - 114.92个月)。所有患者的1年、3年和5年局部无复发生存率(LFFS)分别为97.7%、89.2%和85.9%,区域无复发生存率(RFFS)分别为98.9%、94.4%和94.4%,远处无复发生存率(DFFS)分别为89.7%、79.9%和76.2%,总生存率(OS)分别为92.7%、78.9%和65.3%。CCRT组和单纯IMRT组在LFFS、RFFS、DFFS和OS方面未观察到统计学显著差异。CCRT组和单纯IMRT组在IMRT期间除白细胞减少(p = 0.000)外的急性毒性方面未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

与同步化疗加IMRT相比,单纯IMRT治疗T4期NPC在疾病局部控制和总生存方面取得了相似的治疗效果。然而,这是一项患者数量有限的回顾性研究,此类结果需要在前瞻性随机临床试验中进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/4352046/c8b12a928e0f/pone.0119101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/4352046/c8b12a928e0f/pone.0119101.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e766/4352046/c8b12a928e0f/pone.0119101.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Concurrent chemotherapy for T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放射治疗时代T4期鼻咽癌的同步化疗
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 6;10(3):e0119101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119101. eCollection 2015.
2
Update report of T4 classification nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities.调强放疗后T4期鼻咽癌的更新报告:生存及治疗毒性分析
Oral Oncol. 2015 Feb;51(2):190-4. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
3
IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy versus IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy alone in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强适形放疗联合同步化疗加辅助化疗与调强适形放疗联合单纯同步化疗治疗鼻咽癌患者的比较
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 13;8(24):39683-39694. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14799.
4
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective controlled study.新辅助化疗联合调强放疗与同步放化疗联合辅助化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的回顾性对照研究
Chin J Cancer. 2016 Jan 6;35:2. doi: 10.1186/s40880-015-0076-9.
5
Long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT: a retrospective study.调强放疗治疗II期鼻咽癌时同步放化疗与单纯放疗的长期疗效:一项回顾性研究
Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):4429-38. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4266-5. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
6
Role of sequential chemoradiotherapy in stage II and low-risk stage III-IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.调强放疗时代,Ⅱ期和低危Ⅲ~Ⅳ期鼻咽癌序贯放化疗的作用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Mar;78:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
7
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for ascending or descending types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study.调强放疗或同期放化疗联合同步化疗治疗上升型或下降型鼻咽癌的回顾性研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2022 Jan-Feb;43(1):103193. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2021.103193. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Treatment outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in modern era after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in Hong Kong: A report of 3328 patients (HKNPCSG 1301 study).香港调强放疗时代鼻咽癌的治疗结果:3328 例患者报告(HKNPCSG 1301 研究)。
Oral Oncol. 2018 Feb;77:16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 868 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities.868例鼻咽癌患者调强放疗的长期疗效:生存及治疗毒性分析
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy alone versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for treatment of intermediate-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma.单纯调强放疗与调强放疗联合化疗治疗中危鼻咽癌的疗效和安全性。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Mar 16;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01508-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Early recurrence as a pivotal event in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: identifying predictors and key molecular signals for survivors.早期复发作为鼻咽癌的关键事件:鉴定生存者的预测因子和关键分子信号。
Head Face Med. 2024 Sep 28;20(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00457-7.
2
Explore the Value of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in T3-4N0M0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.探索诱导化疗联合同步放化疗在T3-4N0M0期鼻咽癌患者中的价值:一项回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Sep 9;13:7067-7076. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S321471. eCollection 2021.
3
A Systematic Review of Proton Therapy for the Management of Nasopharyngeal Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Update report of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with reduced-volume intensity-modulated radiation therapy and hypothesis of the optimal margin.鼻咽癌缩野调强放射治疗的最新报告及最佳边界假设
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
2
Controversies in the systemic treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌全身治疗中的争议
Oral Oncol. 2014 Sep;50(9):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
3
Long-term outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 868 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an analysis of survival and treatment toxicities.
质子治疗鼻咽癌的系统评价
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):119-130. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00082.1. eCollection 2021 Summer.
4
Loosening Neuro-Optic Structures Dosimetric Constraints Provides High 5-Year Local Recurrence-Free Survival With Acceptable Toxicity in T4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy.在接受调强放疗的T4期鼻咽癌患者中,放宽神经-视结构剂量限制可提供5年高局部无复发生存率且毒性可接受。
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 22;11:598320. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.598320. eCollection 2021.
5
Significance of boost dose for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with residual primary lesion after intensity-modulated radiotherapy.调强放疗后鼻咽肿瘤残留 T4 期患者行 boost 剂量的意义。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul;147(7):2047-2055. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03479-1. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
6
Standardized nursing and clinical efficacy of OxyContin in reducing oral mucosal pain in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study protocol.奥施康定减轻鼻咽癌患者口腔黏膜疼痛的标准化护理及临床疗效:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23205. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023205.
7
Proton pencil-beam scanning radiotherapy in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer: dosimetric parameters and 2-year results.质子铅笔束扫描放疗治疗鼻咽癌:剂量学参数和 2 年结果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;278(3):763-769. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06175-5. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
Establishment and validation of two nomograms to predict the benefit of concurrent chemotherapy in stage II-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with different risk factors: Analysis based on a large cohort.建立并验证两个列线图模型,以预测不同危险因素的 II-IVa 期鼻咽癌患者同步化疗的获益:基于大样本队列的分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(5):1661-1670. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2841. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
9
Stage-specific concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective, population-based study.局部晚期鼻咽癌采用或不采用诱导化疗的阶段特异性同步放化疗:一项基于人群的回顾性研究
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Nov 20;11:9813-9827. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S179139. eCollection 2019.
10
NACT+IMRT versus NACT+IMRT+CCRT in locoregionally advanced NPC patients: a retrospective study.局部晚期鼻咽癌患者中诱导化疗同步调强放疗与诱导化疗同步调强放疗联合巩固化疗的对比:一项回顾性研究
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Feb 22;12:1553-1562. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S183483. eCollection 2019.
868例鼻咽癌患者调强放疗的长期疗效:生存及治疗毒性分析
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Mar;110(3):398-403. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.020. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
Clinical outcomes and patterns of failure after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放疗治疗 T4 期鼻咽癌的临床结果和失败模式。
Oral Oncol. 2013 Feb;49(2):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
5
A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了调强放疗与常规二维放疗治疗鼻咽癌的疗效和毒性。
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
6
High-grade acute organ toxicity as positive prognostic factor in adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer.高级别急性器官毒性作为局部晚期头颈部癌辅助放化疗的阳性预后因素。
Radiology. 2011 Mar;258(3):864-71. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100705.
7
A randomized trial on addition of concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation for locally-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.局部晚期鼻咽癌同期辅助化疗和(或)加速分割放疗的随机试验。
Radiother Oncol. 2011 Jan;98(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.09.023.
8
Randomized trial of radiotherapy plus concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy alone for regionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.随机对照试验:放疗联合同期辅助化疗对比单纯放疗用于局部晚期鼻咽癌。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Aug 4;102(15):1188-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq258. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
9
High-grade acute organ toxicity as a positive prognostic factor in primary radiochemotherapy for anal carcinoma.原发放化疗治疗肛门癌中,高级别急性器官毒性作为一个阳性预后因素。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Apr 1;79(5):1467-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.010. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
10
Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival.放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗局部晚期头颈部癌:III 期随机试验的 5 年生存数据,以及西妥昔单抗诱导皮疹与生存的关系。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70311-0. Epub 2009 Nov 10.