• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术后的满意度、生活质量和腰痛:缝线与钉合器的比较

Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers.

作者信息

Vieillefosse Sarah, Thubert Thibault, Dache Arnaud, Hermieu Jean-François, Deffieux Xavier

机构信息

AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart 92141, France.

Clinique urologique, hôpital Bichat, AP-HP, 75018 Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.014
PMID:25748488
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the operative results and rate of complications, in particular dorsolumbar pain, following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LS) using sutures or tackers.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study: LS using tackers (n=35, tacker group) compared with LS using sutures (n=65, suture group). In addition to clinical evaluation of prolapse, all patients were evaluated for urinary incontinence (ICIQ-SF), dorsolumbar pain, overall quality of life (SF-36 score), and overall improvement in symptoms (PGI-I), one year after LS.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics (age, initial stage of prolapse,…) were comparable in the two groups, as was operating time (240 vs. 210min, p=0.18). There was no significant between-group difference in terms of anatomical correction (median post-operative ICS stage: 0 in both groups, p=0.26) or post-operative complication rates. The incidence of de novo low back pain appearing after LS was equivalent in both groups (50% vs. 25%, in the tacker and suture groups, respectively, p=0.11). However, there was a significant difference in lumbar pain intensity evaluated using the visual analog scale (4 (IQR 0-6.5) vs. 0 (IQR 0-4) in the tacker and suture groups, respectively; p=0.01), and in post-operative quality of life, which was better in patients in the suture group according to all the questionnaires.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the use of tackers for prosthesis fixation to the promontory does not increase the incidence of post-operative dorsolumbar pain, but may increase its intensity and decrease quality of life.

摘要

目的

比较使用缝线或钉合器进行腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术(LS)后的手术效果和并发症发生率,尤其是腰背部疼痛的发生率。

研究设计

一项病例对照研究:使用钉合器的LS(n = 35,钉合器组)与使用缝线的LS(n = 65,缝线组)进行比较。除了对脱垂进行临床评估外,所有患者在LS术后一年均接受尿失禁(ICIQ - SF)、腰背部疼痛、总体生活质量(SF - 36评分)以及症状总体改善情况(PGI - I)的评估。

结果

两组患者的特征(年龄、脱垂初始阶段等)以及手术时间(240分钟对210分钟,p = 0.18)具有可比性。在解剖学矫正方面(术后中位ICS分期:两组均为0期,p = 0.26)或术后并发症发生率方面,两组之间无显著差异。LS术后新发下腰痛的发生率在两组中相当(钉合器组和缝线组分别为50%和25%,p = 0.11)。然而,使用视觉模拟量表评估的腰痛强度存在显著差异(钉合器组和缝线组分别为4(四分位间距0 - 6.5)和0(四分位间距0 - 4);p = 0.01),并且术后生活质量也存在显著差异,根据所有问卷,缝线组患者的生活质量更好。

结论

我们的研究表明,使用钉合器将假体固定至岬部不会增加术后腰背部疼痛的发生率,但可能会增加其强度并降低生活质量。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction, quality of life and lumbar pain following laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: suture vs. tackers.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术后的满意度、生活质量和腰痛:缝线与钉合器的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Apr;187:51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
2
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: Comparison of standard versus tacker combination method.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:标准与钉枪组合方法的比较。
Int J Urol. 2021 Dec;28(12):1227-1232. doi: 10.1111/iju.14676. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
3
Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.肥胖女性中单纯腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与机器人辅助骶骨阴道固定术功能结局的比较。
Prog Urol. 2014 Dec;24(17):1106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.09.045. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
4
[Evaluation on clinical effectiveness of modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy].改良腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的临床疗效评估
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;48(8):570-4.
5
Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse.腹腔镜前、后聚酯网子宫骶骨固定术治疗生殖泌尿系统脱垂的中期结果。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Jun;156(2):217-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
6
Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.机器人骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:中期手术及生活质量结局综述
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000047.
7
Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on symptoms, health-related quality of life and sexuality: a medium-term analysis.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术对症状、健康相关生活质量和性生活的影响:中期分析。
BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1143-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.12286. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique.机器人辅助腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术在盆腔器官脱垂中保留子宫:生活质量和技术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;165(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.025. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Effects of pelvic organ prolapse repair on urinary symptoms: a comparative study between the laparoscopic and vaginal approach.盆腔器官脱垂修补术对尿症状的影响:腹腔镜与阴道途径的对比研究。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Jan;31(1):126-31. doi: 10.1002/nau.21117. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study.腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂可提高一年生活质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 Nov-Dec;18(6):747-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.08.002.

引用本文的文献

1
A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Dubuisson Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension with Laparoscopic Sacropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Short-Term Results.一项比较杜布瓦松腹腔镜侧方悬吊术与腹腔镜骶骨固定术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的随机临床试验:短期结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 27;13(5):1348. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051348.
2
Spondylodiscitis after sacral colpopexy: diagnose early to treat earlier.骶骨阴道固定术后的脊椎椎间盘炎:早期诊断以便更早治疗。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024 Mar 15;17(3):90-95. doi: 10.62347/RERC7901. eCollection 2024.
3
Pelvic pain after laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: an unrecognized problem?
腹腔镜下盆腔器官脱垂侧方悬吊术后的盆腔疼痛:一个未被认识到的问题?
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Apr;34(4):951-955. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05374-4. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
4
Mesh exposure following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a narrative review.经微创骶骨阴道固定术后的网片暴露:叙事性综述。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Oct;33(10):2713-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04998-2. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Laparoscopic pectopexy: the learning curve and comparison with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.腹腔镜胸壁固定术:学习曲线及与腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术的比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1949-1956. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04934-4. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
6
Modified laparoscopic lateral suspension with a five-arm mesh in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.改良腹腔镜下五臂网片悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01388-0.
7
Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature.腹部机器人重建盆底手术后的长期网片侵蚀率:一项前瞻性研究及文献综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jul;31(7):1423-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Mini-Laparoscopic Repair of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) by Lateral Suspension with Mesh.经腹腔镜采用网片外侧悬吊术微创修复盆腔脏器顶端脱垂(POP)
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):139-145.
9
Uterus preservation is superior to hysterectomy when performing laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh.在进行腹腔镜下网状物侧方悬吊术时,保留子宫优于子宫切除术。
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):557-564. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3678-3. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
10
Patient satisfaction after laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: outcome report of a continuous series of 417 patients.腹腔镜下使用网片进行盆腔器官脱垂侧方悬吊术后的患者满意度:417例连续病例的结果报告
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Nov;28(11):1685-1693. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3327-2. Epub 2017 Apr 17.