Belloch Amparo, Carrió Carmen, Cabedo Elena, García-Soriano Gemma
Department of Personality Psychology, University of Valencia, Avda.Blasco Ibañez 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.
Mental Health Outpatient Clinic, Department 06, Agencia Valenciana de Salud, C/ Rubert i Villo, 4, 46100, Burjassot, Valencia, Spain.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;49(Pt B):180-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Neutralizing strategies are secondary to obsessions and an additional cause of distress and interference, but they have received little attention in theories and research, especially the non-ritualized covert strategies. This study focuses on the comparative impact of non-ritualized covert and compulsive-overt strategies in the course of OCD.
Eighty-two OCD adult patients completed measures assessing distress, interference, appraisals and overt and covert neutralizing strategies to control obsessions. Thirty-eight patients who had completed cognitive therapy were assessed again after treatment.
Only overt compulsions are associated with OCD severity. Nonetheless, considering the main symptom dimension, covert strategies are also associated with severity in patients with moral-based obsessions. Patients who used covert strategies more frequently, compared to those who use them less, reported more sadness, guilt, control importance, interference, and dysfunctional appraisals. Regarding the overt strategies, patients who used them more reported more anxiety and ascribed more personal meaning to their obsessions than the patients who used them less. After treatment, recovered patients decreased their use of both covert and overt strategies, while non-recovered patients did not. There was a higher rate of non-recovered patients among those who used more non-ritualized covert strategies before treatment.
Emotions and appraisals were assessed with a single item. OCD symptom dimensions were only assessed by the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory.
In addition to studying overt compulsions, the impact of covert neutralizing strategies on the OCD course and severity warrants more in-depth study.
中和策略是强迫观念的次要表现,也是困扰和干扰的额外原因,但在理论和研究中很少受到关注,尤其是非仪式化的隐蔽策略。本研究聚焦于非仪式化隐蔽策略和强迫性公开策略在强迫症病程中的比较影响。
82名成年强迫症患者完成了评估困扰、干扰、评价以及控制强迫观念的公开和隐蔽中和策略的测量。38名完成认知治疗的患者在治疗后再次接受评估。
只有公开的强迫行为与强迫症严重程度相关。尽管如此,考虑到主要症状维度,隐蔽策略在基于道德的强迫观念患者中也与严重程度相关。与使用隐蔽策略较少的患者相比,使用隐蔽策略更频繁的患者报告了更多的悲伤、内疚、控制的重要性、干扰和功能失调的评价。关于公开策略,使用公开策略较多的患者比使用公开策略较少的患者报告了更多的焦虑,并且将更多的个人意义归因于他们的强迫观念。治疗后,康复患者减少了对隐蔽和公开策略的使用,而非康复患者则没有。在治疗前使用更多非仪式化隐蔽策略的患者中,未康复患者的比例更高。
情绪和评价通过单个项目进行评估。强迫症症状维度仅通过强迫观念与强迫行为量表进行评估。
除了研究公开的强迫行为外,隐蔽中和策略对强迫症病程和严重程度的影响值得更深入的研究。