Parsons Jeffrey T, Rendina H Jonathon, Ventuneac Ana, Moody Raymond L, Grov Christian
Department of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), 695 Park Ave., New York, NY, 10065, USA.
The Center for HIV/AIDS Educational Studies & Training (CHEST), New York, NY, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2016 Feb;20(2):262-72. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1029-7.
Emerging research supports the notion that sexual compulsivity (SC) and hypersexual disorder (HD) among gay and bisexual men (GBM) might be conceptualized as comprising three groups-Neither SC nor HD; SC only, and Both SC and HD-that capture distinct levels of severity across the SC/HD continuum. We examined data from 370 highly sexually active GBM to assess how the three groups compare across a range of risk factors for HIV infection. Comparisons focused on psychosexual measures-temptation for condomless anal sex (CAS), self-efficacy for avoiding CAS, sexual excitation and inhibition-as well as reports of actual sexual behavior. Nearly half (48.9 %) of this highly sexually active sample was classified as Neither SC nor HD, 30 % as SC Only, and 21.1 % as Both SC and HD. While we found no significant differences between the three groups on reported number of male partners, anal sex acts, or anal sex acts with serodiscordant partners, the Both SC and HD group reported higher numbers of CAS acts and CAS acts with serodiscordant partners and also had a higher proportion of their anal sex acts without condoms compared to the SC Only group. Our findings support the validity of a three-group classification system of SC/HD severity in differentiating psychosexual and HIV-related sexual risk behavior outcomes in a sample of GBM who report similarly high levels of sexual activity. Notwithstanding the need for sex positive HIV prevention programs, interventions that attempt to help Both SC and HD men deal with distress and address their psychosexual needs specifically may derive HIV prevention benefits.
新出现的研究支持这样一种观点,即男同性恋者和双性恋男性中的性强迫行为(SC)和性欲亢进症(HD)可被概念化为包括三组:既无SC也无HD;仅有SC;以及既有SC又有HD。这三组反映了SC/HD连续体上不同的严重程度。我们研究了370名性活动频繁的男同性恋者和双性恋男性的数据,以评估这三组在一系列HIV感染风险因素方面的差异。比较重点在于性心理测量指标——无保护肛交的诱惑(CAS)、避免CAS的自我效能感、性兴奋和性抑制——以及实际性行为报告。在这个性活动频繁的样本中,近一半(48.9%)被归类为既无SC也无HD,30%为仅有SC,21.1%为既有SC又有HD。虽然我们发现三组在报告的男性性伴侣数量、肛交行为或与血清学不一致伴侣的肛交行为方面没有显著差异,但既有SC又有HD组报告的CAS行为和与血清学不一致伴侣的CAS行为数量更多,并且与仅有SC组相比,他们无保护肛交行为的比例也更高。我们的研究结果支持了SC/HD严重程度的三组分类系统在区分性心理和与HIV相关的性风险行为结果方面的有效性,该样本中的男同性恋者和双性恋男性报告的性活动水平同样较高。尽管需要积极的HIV预防项目,但专门帮助既有SC又有HD的男性应对困扰并满足其性心理需求的干预措施可能会带来HIV预防益处。