Bunchman Timothy E
Pediatric Nephrology & Transplantation, Children's Hospital of Richmond, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA,
Pediatr Nephrol. 2015 May;30(5):701-2. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2998-x. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
The utilization of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the setting of hyperammonia is a rare and complicated occurrence. Data demonstrate that the quicker the ammonia level is normalized, the better the neurological outcome. The optimal form of RRT is often decided by local practice. The recent work by Picca and colleagues details a larger series of children who underwent RRT for hyperammonia and adds some credence to the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in this population. While these authors conclude that PD is not optimal, they do note that the use of PD may be an option when other forms of RRT are not available. The results reinforce the general maxim that you should continue to do that which you do well and often, which in this context refers to continuing to use your form of RRT until alternative modalities are available.
在高氨血症情况下使用肾脏替代疗法(RRT)是一种罕见且复杂的情况。数据表明,氨水平恢复正常越快,神经学预后越好。RRT的最佳形式通常由当地的医疗实践决定。皮卡及其同事最近的研究详细介绍了一系列因高氨血症接受RRT的儿童,并为在这一人群中使用腹膜透析(PD)增添了一些可信度。虽然这些作者得出结论认为PD并非最佳选择,但他们确实指出,当无法采用其他形式的RRT时,PD可能是一种选择。这些结果强化了一条普遍准则,即应该继续做好并经常做的事情,在这种情况下是指继续采用现有的RRT形式,直到有其他替代方式可用。