Olendzki Barbara C, Procter-Gray Elizabeth, Wedick Nicole M, Patil Vijayalakshmi, Zheng Hua, Kane Kevin, Land Thomas, Li Wenjun
a University of Massachusetts Medical School , Worcester , Massachusetts.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2015;34(2):150-8. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.917058. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
To analyze geographic and income disparities in access to healthy foods in central Massachusetts.
We surveyed 106 (92% of all) food stores longitudinally in the study area between 2007 and 2010. We analyzed the geographic and temporal variations in community- and store-level healthy food availability indices (HFAI) and unhealthy food availability indices (UFAI) overall and by select store and community characteristics.
Twenty-seven of 68 communities in the study area (39.7%) had no food store and 5 (8.3%) had one or few stores with very limited availability of healthy foods, affecting 23.7% of the county population. Lack of food stores was associated strongly with lower housing density and upper tertile of median household income. About 45% of the surveyed stores had inadequate availabilities of healthy food. Store-level HFAI and UFAI scores were highly correlated, and higher among larger stores affiliated with a chain (vs independent). Though healthy foods were usually most available in larger stores, unhealthy foods were widely available in all stores.
Over half of central Massachusetts communities, mostly rural and small, had either no food store or few stores with limited availabilities of healthy foods. Immediate policy interventions on the food environment are necessary in these communities. Further, without examining what is actually sold in stores, analysis of disparities in access to healthy food relies on the number of food stores, which can lead to a distorted picture of accessibility and mislead community health policies.
分析马萨诸塞州中部地区在获取健康食品方面的地理和收入差异。
2007年至2010年期间,我们对研究区域内的106家(占总数的92%)食品商店进行了纵向调查。我们分析了社区和商店层面健康食品可及性指数(HFAI)和不健康食品可及性指数(UFAI)的地理和时间变化,整体情况以及按选定的商店和社区特征进行分析。
研究区域内68个社区中有27个(39.7%)没有食品商店,5个(8.3%)社区有一家或几家健康食品供应非常有限的商店,影响了该县23.7%的人口。食品商店的缺乏与较低的住房密度和家庭收入中位数的上三分位数密切相关。约45%的被调查商店健康食品供应不足。商店层面的HFAI和UFAI得分高度相关,在连锁附属的较大商店中得分更高(相对于独立商店)。虽然健康食品通常在较大的商店中供应最多,但不健康食品在所有商店中都广泛供应。
马萨诸塞州中部地区超过一半的社区,大多是农村和小型社区,要么没有食品商店,要么只有几家健康食品供应有限的商店。这些社区需要立即对食品环境进行政策干预。此外,如果不检查商店实际销售的商品,对获取健康食品差异的分析依赖于食品商店的数量,这可能会导致对可及性的扭曲认识,并误导社区健康政策。