• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用潜在类别分析确定小学生的学业和行为风险状况。

Using latent class analysis to identify academic and behavioral risk status in elementary students.

作者信息

King Kathleen R, Lembke Erica S, Reinke Wendy M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, East Carolina University.

Department of Special Education, University of Missouri.

出版信息

Sch Psychol Q. 2016 Mar;31(1):43-57. doi: 10.1037/spq0000111. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1037/spq0000111
PMID:25751497
Abstract

Identifying classes of children on the basis of academic and behavior risk may have important implications for the allocation of intervention resources within Response to Intervention (RTI) and Multi-Tiered System of Support (MTSS) models. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted with a sample of 517 third grade students. Fall screening scores in the areas of reading, mathematics, and behavior were used as indicators of success on an end of year statewide achievement test. Results identified 3 subclasses of children, including a class with minimal academic and behavioral concerns (Tier 1; 32% of the sample), a class at-risk for academic problems and somewhat at-risk for behavior problems (Tier 2; 37% of the sample), and a class with significant academic and behavior problems (Tier 3; 31%). Each class was predictive of end of year performance on the statewide achievement test, with the Tier 1 class performing significantly higher on the test than the Tier 2 class, which in turn scored significantly higher than the Tier 3 class. The results of this study indicated that distinct classes of children can be determined through brief screening measures and are predictive of later academic success. Further implications are discussed for prevention and intervention for students at risk for academic failure and behavior problems. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

根据学业和行为风险对儿童进行分类,可能会对响应干预(RTI)和多层次支持系统(MTSS)模型中的干预资源分配产生重要影响。对517名三年级学生的样本进行了潜在类别分析(LCA)。阅读、数学和行为领域的秋季筛查分数被用作全州年终学业成就测试成功与否的指标。结果确定了3类儿童,包括学业和行为问题最少的一类(第1层;占样本的32%)、有学业问题风险且有一定行为问题风险的一类(第2层;占样本的37%),以及有严重学业和行为问题的一类(第3层;占31%)。每一类都能预测全州学业成就测试的年终成绩,第1层的学生在测试中的表现显著高于第2层的学生,而第2层的学生又比第3层的学生得分显著更高。这项研究的结果表明,可以通过简短的筛查措施确定不同类别的儿童,并且这些类别能够预测他们日后的学业成就。本文还讨论了对有学业失败和行为问题风险的学生进行预防和干预的进一步意义。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Using latent class analysis to identify academic and behavioral risk status in elementary students.运用潜在类别分析确定小学生的学业和行为风险状况。
Sch Psychol Q. 2016 Mar;31(1):43-57. doi: 10.1037/spq0000111. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Co-occurrence of academic and behavioral risk within elementary schools: Implications for universal screening practices.中小学学术和行为风险的共同出现:对普遍筛查实践的影响。
Sch Psychol. 2019 May;34(3):261-270. doi: 10.1037/spq0000314. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Children with co-occurring academic and behavior problems in first grade: distal outcomes in twelfth grade.一年级同时存在学业和行为问题的儿童:十二年级的远期结果。
J Sch Psychol. 2013 Feb;51(1):117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.005. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
4
Academic Performance in Primary School Children With Common Emotional and Behavioral Problems.患有常见情绪和行为问题的小学生的学业表现。
J Sch Health. 2017 Aug;87(8):593-601. doi: 10.1111/josh.12531.
5
Physical fitness and academic achievement in third- and fifth-grade students.三、五年级学生的身体素质与学业成绩
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Apr;29(2):239-52. doi: 10.1123/jsep.29.2.239.
6
Physically Active Math and Language Lessons Improve Academic Achievement: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.体育活动融入数学和语言课程可提高学业成绩:一项整群随机对照试验
Pediatrics. 2016 Mar;137(3):e20152743. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2743. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
7
A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance.努力投入和学业自我效能感对学业成绩的个体内和个体间影响的纵向多层模型分析。
J Sch Psychol. 2014 Jun;52(3):295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 May 17.
8
Use of universal screening scores to predict distal academic and behavioral outcomes: A multilevel approach.使用通用筛查分数预测远端学业和行为结果:一种多层次方法。
Psychol Assess. 2017 May;29(5):486-499. doi: 10.1037/pas0000355. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
Physical fitness and academic achievement in elementary school children.小学生的身体素质与学业成绩。
J Phys Act Health. 2009 Jan;6(1):99-104. doi: 10.1123/jpah.6.1.99.
10
Classification accuracy and acceptability of the Integrated Screening and Intervention System Teacher Rating Form.综合筛查与干预系统教师评级表的分类准确性与可接受性
Sch Psychol Q. 2017 Jun;32(2):212-225. doi: 10.1037/spq0000147. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Student Subgroups as a Function of School Level Attributes: A Multilevel Latent Class Analysis.根据学校层面属性确定学生亚组:多层次潜在类别分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 26;12:624221. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.624221. eCollection 2021.
2
Childhood homelessness, resilience, and adolescent mental health: A prospective, person-centered approach.童年无家可归、复原力与青少年心理健康:一种前瞻性的、以个体为中心的方法。
Psychol Sch. 2020 Dec;57(12):1830-1844. doi: 10.1002/pits.22331. Epub 2019 Dec 19.