• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

带隧道的中心静脉导管(TCVCs)患者的中心静脉狭窄与导管相关感染之间是否存在关联?

Is there an association between central vein stenosis and line infection in patients with tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs)?

作者信息

Aitken Emma, Honour Patrick, Johnson Natalie, Kingsmore David

机构信息

1 Department of Renal Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland - UK.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2015;16 Suppl 9:S42-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000335. Epub 2015 Mar 8.

DOI:10.5301/jva.5000335
PMID:25751550
Abstract

PURPOSE

Central vein stenosis (CVS) and line infection are well-recognized complications of tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs) in patients on haemodialysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate any relationship between CVS and line infection.

METHODS

Analysis of 500 consecutive patients undergoing TCVC insertion was undertaken. Data were collected on patient demographics, details of line insertion and duration, culture-proven bacteraemia and presence of symptomatic CVS. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for CVS and bacteraemia.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 59.0 years (range: 17-93). Mean number of catheter days was 961.1 ± 57.6 per TCVC; 39.4% of TCVCs were associated with culture-proven bacteraemia and 23.6% developed symptomatic CVS. Bacteraemia and CVS were inevitable complications of all TCVCs. The time to symptomatic CVS was longer in patients with bacteraemia than without (1230.91 ± 101.29 vs. 677.49 ± 61.59 days, p<0.001). Patients who had early infection within 90 days of TCVC insertion were less likely to develop CVS (5.9% vs. 22.8%, p<0.001). There was no difference in the bacteraemia rate per 1,000 catheter days between patients with and without CVS (2.62 ± 1.41 vs. 2.35 ± 0.51; p = 0.98). Number of line days (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, p = 0.003), age (OR 1.04, p = 0.04) and culture-proven line infection (OR 0.59, p = 0.014) were all independently associated with CVS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that early line infection may be protective against CVS. Alternatively, there may be two distinct predisposition states for CVS and line infection. Further studies are needed to confirm our association and investigate causation.

摘要

目的

中心静脉狭窄(CVS)和导管相关感染是血液透析患者带隧道中心静脉导管(TCVC)常见的并发症。本研究旨在评估CVS与导管相关感染之间的关系。

方法

对500例连续接受TCVC置入的患者进行分析。收集患者人口统计学资料、导管置入细节及持续时间、经培养证实的菌血症以及有症状CVS的情况。采用逻辑回归分析确定CVS和菌血症的危险因素。

结果

患者平均年龄为59.0岁(范围:17 - 93岁)。每根TCVC的平均导管留置天数为961.1±57.6天;39.4%的TCVC与经培养证实的菌血症相关,23.6%出现有症状的CVS。菌血症和CVS是所有TCVC不可避免的并发症。有菌血症的患者出现有症状CVS的时间比无菌血症的患者更长(1230.91±101.29天对677.49±61.59天,p<0.001)。在TCVC置入后90天内发生早期感染的患者发生CVS的可能性较小(5.9%对22.8%,p<0.001)。有无CVS的患者每1000导管日的菌血症发生率无差异(2.62±1.41对2.35±0.51;p = 0.98)。导管留置天数(比值比(OR)1.02,p = 0.003)、年龄(OR 1.04,p = 0.04)和经培养证实的导管相关感染(OR 0.59,p = 0.014)均与CVS独立相关。

结论

我们的结果表明早期导管相关感染可能对CVS有保护作用。或者,CVS和导管相关感染可能存在两种不同的易患状态。需要进一步研究来证实我们的关联并探究因果关系。

相似文献

1
Is there an association between central vein stenosis and line infection in patients with tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs)?带隧道的中心静脉导管(TCVCs)患者的中心静脉狭窄与导管相关感染之间是否存在关联?
J Vasc Access. 2015;16 Suppl 9:S42-7. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000335. Epub 2015 Mar 8.
2
Are early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) a viable alternative to tunnelled central venous catheters (TCVCs)? An observational "virtual study" and budget impact analysis.早期动静脉内瘘(ecAVG)能否成为隧道式中心静脉导管(TCVC)的可行替代方案?一项观察性“虚拟研究”及预算影响分析。
J Vasc Access. 2016 May 7;17(3):220-8. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000519. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
3
A randomized controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis of early cannulation arteriovenous grafts versus tunneled central venous catheters in patients requiring urgent vascular access for hemodialysis.一项针对需要紧急血管通路进行血液透析的患者,比较早期动静脉内瘘插管与隧道式中心静脉导管的随机对照试验及成本效益分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.103.
4
Evaluation of PICC complications in orthopedic inpatients with bone infection for long-term intravenous antibiotics therapy.骨科骨感染住院患者长期静脉应用抗生素治疗中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管并发症的评估
J Vasc Access. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):299-308. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000389. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Hemodialysis tunneled central venous catheters: five-year outcome analysis.血液透析隧道式中心静脉导管:五年结局分析
J Vasc Access. 2014 Nov-Dec;15(6):461-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000236. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
6
Outcomes of a nephrologist-driven tunnelled dialysis catheter insertion service in South East Asia.东南亚由肾病学家主导的隧道式透析导管插入服务的结果。
J Vasc Access. 2017 Jul 14;18(4):279-283. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000746. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
7
Risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection in elderly patients on hemodialysis.老年血液透析患者发生导管相关血流感染的风险
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Apr;9(4):764-70. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07710713. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
8
The use of tunneled central venous catheters: inevitable or system failure?隧道式中心静脉导管的使用:是不可避免还是系统故障?
J Vasc Access. 2014 Sep-Oct;15(5):344-50. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000206. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Antibiotic lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related bacteraemia in haemodialysis patients.抗生素封管溶液预防血液透析患者导管相关菌血症。
Hong Kong Med J. 2010 Aug;16(4):269-74.
10
Longer duration of catheter patency, but similar infection rates with internal jugular vein versus iliac vein tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters: a single-center retrospective analysis.颈内静脉与髂静脉带隧道带涤纶套血液透析导管的导管通畅持续时间更长,但感染率相似:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Oct;47(10):1727-34. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1089-7. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Lesion Type Analysis of Hemodialysis Patients Who Underwent Endovascular Management for Symptomatic Central Venous Disease.接受症状性中心静脉疾病血管内治疗的血液透析患者的病变类型分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2020 Oct 9;16:419-427. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S273450. eCollection 2020.