Suppr超能文献

分裂情感性障碍中的抗精神病药物转换:一项系统综述。

Antipsychotic switching in schizoaffective disorder: A systematic review.

作者信息

Murru Andrea, Hidalgo Diego, Bernardo Miquel, Bobes Julio, Saiz-Ruiz Jerónimo, Álamo Cecilio, Vieta Eduard

机构信息

a Bipolar Disorders Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona , IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM, Barcelona , Catalonia , Spain.

b Barcelona Clinic, Schizophrenia Unit, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERSAM , Barcelona , Catalonia , Spain.

出版信息

World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;17(7):495-513. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2015.1012225. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence about the switching of antipsychotics in SZA in acute and maintenance treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review following the PRISMA statement identifying studies specifically conducted on, or including, SZA patients.

RESULTS

One analysis considered uniquely a SZA population, 13 more studies including an adequate SZA subsample were considered. Most of the studies were aimed at switching antipsychotic treatments to improve tolerability issues. Despite the absolute lack of trials specifically conducted on SZA populations, we found limited evidence on the use of aripiprazole, lurasidone, and, to a lesser extent, risperidone and ziprasidone as possible agents to substitute previous treatments whereas efficacy or, more frequently, tolerability issues arise. Evidence supports also the switch to risperidone long-acting injectable when the adherence to oral treatment may be a concern.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic switching in SZA is a neglected topic that would need better profiling. Clinicians should keep in mind the receptor binding characteristics of drugs in order to optimize transitions. Evidence supports the switch to aripiprazole and lurasidone, less strongly to risperidone and ziprasidone. The switch to risperidone long-acting injectable is supported, especially in patients with limited treatment adherence to oral therapy.

摘要

目的

系统评价精神分裂症急性期和维持期治疗中抗精神病药物换药的证据。

方法

按照PRISMA声明进行系统评价,确定专门针对精神分裂症患者开展的研究或纳入了精神分裂症患者的研究。

结果

一项分析仅纳入了精神分裂症患者群体,另外还纳入了13项包含足够精神分裂症亚组样本的研究。大多数研究旨在更换抗精神病药物治疗以改善耐受性问题。尽管绝对缺乏专门针对精神分裂症患者群体开展的试验,但我们发现,在出现疗效问题或更常见的耐受性问题时,使用阿立哌唑、鲁拉西酮以及在较小程度上使用利培酮和齐拉西酮作为替代先前治疗的可能药物的证据有限。当口服治疗的依从性可能令人担忧时,证据也支持换用利培酮长效注射剂。

结论

精神分裂症患者的抗精神病药物换药是一个被忽视的话题,需要更深入的剖析。临床医生应牢记药物的受体结合特性,以优化换药过程。证据支持换用阿立哌唑和鲁拉西酮,对利培酮和齐拉西酮的支持力度较小。换用利培酮长效注射剂得到了支持,尤其是在口服治疗依从性有限的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验